Evaluation Design Plan Sample Clauses

Evaluation Design Plan. At a minimum, the draft design must include a discussion of the goals, objectives, and specific hypotheses that are being tested, including those outlined in subparagraphs (c) and (d), as well as those that focus specifically on the target populations within the Acute Care, ALTCS, SMI, ESI program and the Family Planning Extension Program within the demonstration. The draft design plan must also include a separate section discussing the AACP cost sharing, the missed appointment fee evaluation requirements, the uncompensated care payments to IHS and 638 facilities and the CRS and SMI integration programs as described further in subparagraphs (c) - (f). The draft design shall discuss the outcome measures that must be used in evaluating the impact of the demonstration during the period of approval, particularly among the target population. It shall discuss the data sources and sampling methodology for assessing these outcomes (Attachment B – Evaluation Design Guidelines). The draft evaluation design must include a detailed analysis plan that describes how the effects of the demonstration are isolated from other initiatives occurring in the state. The state must submit a revised draft evaluation design plan by April 1, 2015, in order to include the evaluation requirements outlined in subparagraph (e) – (g).
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (5)
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Evaluation Design Plan. The State must submit to CMS for approval a draft evaluation design no later April 1, 2012. At a minimum, the draft design must include a discussion of the goals, objectives, and specific hypotheses that are being tested, including those outlined in subparagraphs (c) and (d), as well as those that focus specifically on the target populations within the Acute Care, ALTCS, ESI program and the Family Planning Extension Program within the demonstration. The draft design plan must also include a separate section discussing the AACP cost sharing, the missed appointment fee evaluation requirements, the uncompensated care payments to IHS and 638 facilities and the CRS and SMI integration programs as described further in subparagraphs (c) - (f). The draft design shall discuss the outcome measures that must be used in evaluating the impact of the Demonstration during the period of approval, particularly among the target population. It shall discuss the data sources and sampling methodology for assessing these outcomes (Attachment C – Evaluation Design Guidelines). The draft evaluation design must include a detailed analysis plan that describes how the effects of the Demonstration are isolated from other initiatives occurring in the State. The State must submit a revised draft evaluation design plan by April 1, 2013, in order to include the specific hypotheses outlined in subparagraph (e).
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (4)
Evaluation Design Plan. The State must submit to CMS for approval a draft evaluation design no later April 1, 2012. At a minimum, the draft design must include a discussion of the goals, objectives, and specific hypotheses that are being tested, including those outlined in subparagraphs (c) and (d), as well as those that focus specifically on the target populations within the Acute Care, ALTCS, ESI program and the Family Planning Extension Program within the demonstration. The draft design plan must also include a separate section discussing the AACP cost sharing and missed appointment fee evaluation requirements as described further in subparagraphs (c) and (d). The draft design shall discuss the outcome measures that must be used in evaluating the impact of the Demonstration during the period of approval, particularly among the target population. It shall discuss the data sources and sampling methodology for assessing these outcomes (Attachment C – Evaluation Design Guidelines). The draft evaluation design must include a detailed analysis plan that describes how the effects of the Demonstration are isolated from other initiatives occurring in the State. The State must submit a revised draft evaluation design plan by June 1, 2012, in order to include the specific hypotheses outlined in subparagraph (e).
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (4)

Related to Evaluation Design Plan

  • Evaluation Plan The systematic blueprint detailing the evaluation aspects of the project.

  • Performance Improvement Plan timely and accurate completion of key actions due within the reporting period 100 percent The Supplier will design and develop an improvement plan and agree milestones and deliverables with the Authority

  • Evaluation Forms a. Performance evaluation forms will at a minimum have:

  • Development Plan document specifying the work program, schedule, and relevant investments required for the Development and the Production of a Discovery or set of Discoveries of Oil and Gas in the Contract Area, including its abandonment.

  • Evaluation Cycle Goal Setting and Development of the Educator Plan

  • Feasibility Study Buyer will, at Buyer's expense and within ____ days from Effective Date ("Feasibility Study Period"), determine whether the Property is suitable, in Buyer's sole and absolute discretion, for ___________________ use. During the Feasibility Study Period, Buyer may conduct a Phase I environmental assessment and any other tests, analyses, surveys and investigations ("Inspections") that Buyer deems necessary to determine to Buyer's satisfaction the Property's engineering, architectural and environmental properties; zoning and zoning restrictions; subdivision statutes; soil and grade; availability of access public roads, water, and other utilities; consistency with local, state and regional growth management plans, availability of permits, government approvals, and licenses; and other inspections that Buyer deems appropriate to determine the Property's suitability for the Buyer's intended use. If the Property must be rezoned, Buyer will obtain the rezoning from the appropriatx xxxernment agencies. Seller will sign all documents Buyer is required to file in connection with development or rezoning approvals. Seller gives Buyer, its agents, contractors and assigns, the right to enter the Property at any time during the Feasibility Study Period for the purpose of conducting inspections; provided, however, that Buyer, its agents, contractors and assigns enter the Property and conduct inspections at their own risk. Buyer will indemnify and hold Seller harmless from xxxxes, damages, costs, claims and expenses of any nature, including attorney's fees, expenses and liability incurred in application for rezoning or related proceedings, and from liability to any person, arising from the conduct of any and all inspections of any work authorized by Buyer. Buyer will not engage in any activity that xxxxx result in a construction lien being filed against the Property without Seller's prior written consent. If this transaction does not close, Buyer will, at Buyer's expense, (1) repair all damages to the Property resulting from the Inspections and return the Property to the condition it was in prior to conduct of the Inspections, and (2) release to Seller all reports and other work generated as a result of the Inspections. Buyer will deliver written notice to Seller prior to the expiration of the Feasibility Study Period of Buyer's determination of whether or not the Properxx xx acceptable. Buyer's failure to comply with this notice requirement will constitute acceptance of the Property as suitable for Buyer's intended use in its "as is" condition. If the Property is unacceptable to Buyer and written notice of this fact is timely delivered to Seller, this Contract will be deemed terminated as of the day after the Feasibility Study period ends and Buyer's deposit(s) will be returned after Escrow Axxxx receives proper authorization form all interested parties.

  • Development Plans 4.3.1 For each Licensed Indication and corresponding Licensed Product in the Field, Licensee will prepare and deliver to Licensor a development plan and budget (each a “Development Plan”). The initial Development Plans for each Licensed Indication will be delivered within […***…] after the Grant Date for such Licensed Indication.

  • Performance Improvement Process 9.5.1 The purpose of the Performance Improvement Process is to remedy or mitigate the impact of a Performance Factor. The Performance Improvement Process may include: a requirement that the Hospital develop an Improvement Plan; or an amendment of the Hospital’s obligations as mutually agreed by the parties.

  • Evaluation Form The Union agrees that the Management Rights provision of this Agreement and Section 3-302 of the State Personnel and Pension Article confers upon the State the authority to make changes to the forms used to evaluate employees. Such changes may be implemented after notification to the Union.

  • Completion of Evaluation Cycle 1. The summative evaluation rating shall be based upon a preponderance of the evidence, assessed in a holistic manner, that is aligned to the Ohio Educator Standards. Only evidence gathered during the walkthroughs and formal observations that are conducted for the current school year may be used.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.