EVALUATION AND GRADING Sample Clauses

EVALUATION AND GRADING. 5.1 The Student agrees to the assessment of their performance in the EDISS programme based on the assignments and examination of the specific courses and according to the policies at the EDISS partner universities. The examination procedures and evaluation criteria are described in the course descriptions or communicated by the designated lecturer in the first session of the course. Exam and holiday periods are organized according to the policies at the EDISS partner universities. Stipulations applying to students when registering to subjects and taking exams are those in force at the university where the subject is lectured. 5.2 The Student must regularly attend the courses in their study plan, and when required, complete all assignments and participate in mandatory activities such as examinations, intermediate tests, seminars and conferences. Justified “force majeure” cases, such as an acute illness, can be considered and approved by the local EDISS Coordinator, provided that the Student informs the local Coordinator of such an event without delay. Failed exams, lack of sufficient progress in the evaluation activities or failure to regularly attend the EDISS courses and mandatory activities can be grounds for suspending the payment of the scholarship. 5.3 The Student expressly complies with the procedures for handling cases of plagiarism as defined by the EDISS partner universities. The Student is aware that the partner universities do not accept plagiarism in any form and that the universities may and will use plagiarism detection software to identify possible cases of plagiarism. All cases of plagiarism shall be reported to the local EDISS Coordinator. If the Student has been found to have committed plagiarism, or they have shown other types of academic misconduct (such as cheating in an exam) the consequences (such as suspension or losing credits for the course) will be based on the policies at the university in question. Depending on the severity of the case, the Programme Board can decide to exclude the Student from the EDISS programme with the same economic consequences as described in § 5.2. 5.4 The grading scales for the universities are given below: 5.4.1 Grading scale (courses and thesis) at AAU and MDU A (5) EXCELLENT: outstanding performance with only minor errors
View SourceView Similar (14)
EVALUATION AND GRADING. At the conclusion of each course, the Course Director will take responsibility for the evaluation of your written work and/or oral presentation. At the conclusion of the Super Curricular Programme, the Summer Programmes Co-ordinator will provide you with details of the academic evaluation of your overall performance, including your written work. Grades will be awarded for each student in each subject area studied. Grades will be awarded on a scale of A (excellent) to D (lowest pass mark). The decision of the Summer Programmes Co-ordinator on grades, reached after consultation with appropriate course personnel, will be binding as to grades awarded by ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇. Such decision shall be sent directly to each individual student.
View SourceView Similar (2)
EVALUATION AND GRADING. This instructor's tests and assignments covered the assigned materials and the emphasized aspects of the course. These tests and assignments were clearly worded.
View Source
EVALUATION AND GRADING. Subject to the School Act and Regulations and Article the application of consistent evaluation and grading practices including the pass/fail provisions applying to each student shall be under the individual professional autonomy of the teacher.
View Source

Related to EVALUATION AND GRADING

  • EVALUATION AND MONITORING The ORGANIZATION agrees to maintain books, records and other documents and evidence, and to use accounting procedures and practices that sufficiently and properly support the complete performance of and the full compliance with this Agreement. The ORGANIZATION will retain these supporting books, records, documents and other materials for at least three (3) calendar years following the year in which the Agreement expires. The COUNTY and/or the State Auditor and any of their representatives shall have full and complete access to these books, records and other documents and evidence retained by the ORGANIZATION respecting all matters covered in and under this Agreement, and shall have the right to examine such during normal business hours as often as the COUNTY and/or the State Auditor may deem necessary. Such representatives shall be permitted to audit, examine and make excerpts or transcripts from such records, and to make audits of all contracts, invoices, materials, and records of matters covered by this Agreement. These access and examination rights shall last for three calendar years following the year in which the Agreement expires. The COUNTY intends without guarantee for its agents to use reasonable security procedures and protections to assure that related records and documents provided by the ORGANIZATION are not erroneously disclosed to third parties. The COUNTY will, however, disclose or make this material available to those authorized by/in the above paragraph or permitted under the provisions of Chapter 42.56 RCW without notice to the ORGANIZATION. The ORGANIZATION shall cooperate with and freely participate in any other monitoring or evaluation activities pertinent to this Agreement that the COUNTY finds needing to be conducted.

  • Evaluation 1. The purposes of evaluation provisions include providing employees with feedback, and employers and employees with the opportunity and responsibility to address concerns. Where a grievance proceeds to arbitration, the arbitrator must consider these purposes, and may relieve on just and reasonable terms against breaches of time limits or other procedural requirements.

  • Evaluation, Testing, and Monitoring 1. The System Agency may review, test, evaluate and monitor Grantee’s Products and services, as well as associated documentation and technical support for compliance with the Accessibility Standards. Review, testing, evaluation and monitoring may be conducted before and after the award of a contract. Testing and monitoring may include user acceptance testing. Neither the review, testing (including acceptance testing), evaluation or monitoring of any Product or service, nor the absence of review, testing, evaluation or monitoring, will result in a waiver of the State’s right to contest the Grantee’s assertion of compliance with the Accessibility Standards. 2. Grantee agrees to cooperate fully and provide the System Agency and its representatives timely access to Products, records, and other items and information needed to conduct such review, evaluation, testing, and monitoring.

  • Inspection and Testing Each Constructing Entity shall cause inspection and testing of the Interconnection Facilities that it constructs in accordance with the provisions of this section. The Construction Parties acknowledge and agree that inspection and testing of facilities may be undertaken as facilities are completed and need not await completion of all of the facilities that a Constructing Entity is building.

  • Inspection and Tests 3.8.1 The Procuring entity or its representative shall have the right to inspect and/or to test the goods to confirm their conformity to the Contract specifications. The Procuring entity shall notify the tenderer in writing in a timely manner, of the identity of any representatives retained for these purposes. 3.8.2 The inspections and tests may be conducted in the premises of the tenderer or its subcontractor(s), at point of delivery, and/or at the Goods’ final destination If conducted on the premises of the tenderer or its subcontractor(s), all reasonable facilities and assistance, including access to drawings and production data, shall be furnished to the inspectors at no charge to the Procuring entity. 3.8.3 Should any inspected or tested goods fail to conform to the Specifications, the Procuring entity may reject the equipment, and the tenderer shall either replace the rejected equipment or make alterations necessary to make specification requirements free of costs to the Procuring entity. 3.8.4 The Procuring entity’s right to inspect, test and where necessary, reject the goods after the Goods’ arrival shall in no way be limited or waived by reason of the equipment having previously been inspected, tested and passed by the Procuring entity or its representative prior to the equipment delivery. 3.8.5 Nothing in paragraph 3.8 shall in any way release the tenderer from any warranty or other obligations under this Contract.