Environmental Mitigation. Owner is responsible for wetlands mitigation required by Permits, Applicable Law or Governmental Instrumentalities to be performed on or off the Stage 2 Site. Subject to Applicable Law and Permits. It is anticipated that most such mitigation will take place after the majority of construction by the Contractor has been completed. Contractor shall cooperate to ensure the mitigation is accomplished expeditiously and with minimum interference.
Environmental Mitigation. Contractor shall comply with all applicable mitigation measures, if any, adopted by any public agency with respect to this Project pursuant to the environmental protections laws of the State of Oregon.
Environmental Mitigation. Owner is responsible for wetlands mitigation required by Permits, Applicable Law or Governmental Instrumentalities to be performed on the Phase 3 Site as defined in the Scoping Documents and Attachment 25 Exhibit 25-1, dredge site BUDM placement, and dredge pipeline right-of-way. Contractor will be responsible for wetland mitigation at offsite park and rides, offsite laydown yards, and offsite assembly areas as required by Contractor to perform the Work. Contractor, at its own cost, shall cooperate to allow the mitigation that is the responsibility of Owner to be accomplished expeditiously and with minimum interference.
Environmental Mitigation. CHSRA will fully implement the FRA-approved MMEP and any conditions of Federal and state environmental approvals and permits required for construction of the FCS. The CHSRA understands that FRA may withhold payment if FRA determines that the CHSRA (or its contractors) has failed to comply with the FRA-approved MMEP or the conditions of any Federal or state environmental permit.
Environmental Mitigation. In connection with City's approval of any Subsequent Approval or issuance of any other permit or approval that is subject to CEQA, and to the extent permitted or required by CEQA, City shall commence and process any and all preliminary reviews, initial studies and other assessments pursuant to CEQA, and City shall first consider using and adopting any existing environmental impact report(s) certified for the Project, addenda thereto and other existing environmental reports and studies as adequately addressing the environmental impacts of such matter or matters before requiring new or supplemental review or documentation.
Environmental Mitigation. The parties understand that the EIR was intended to be used in connection with all of the Project Approvals needed for the Project.
Environmental Mitigation. The parties understand that the EIR for the Project is a project level CEQA document intended to be used in connection with each of the Project Approvals and Subsequent Approvals needed for the Project. Consistent with the CEQA policies and requirements applicable to the EIR, City agrees to use the EIR in connection with the processing of any Subsequent Approval to the extent allowed by law. City agrees not to impose on Developer any mitigation measures or other conditions of approval other than those specifically imposed by the Project Approvals and the Mitigation Monitoring Program described in the FEIR, specifically required by Applicable Law, or as properly required through the design or architecture review process as long as such mitigation measures or other conditions are imposed in a manner consistent with applicable design review guidelines.
Environmental Mitigation. ▪ To implement environmental mitigation measures in San Marcos as described in the Environmental Mitigation and Monitoring Plan for the Coffee Value Chain, RVCP worked with ANACAFE to organize 73 training events pertaining to climate change. A total of 1,342 coffee producers (985 men and 357 women) participated. As a result, 1,224 growers implemented environmental mitigation measures. A separate report provides further details on progress to implement the Plan. ▪ To implement environmental mitigation measures in Huehuetenango as described in the Environmental Mitigation and Monitoring Plan for the Coffee Value Chain, (see separate report) and PERSUAP, RVCP worked with ANACAFE as follows: − 20 training events for 496 participants (346 men and 150 women); − Classroom instruction and hands-on exercises to learn the use and safe handling of pesticides (included providing 50 sets of spray equipment and PPE to curb the spread of coffee rust disease); − Set up 120 biodeps for producer organizations; building on that success, growers used their own resources to set up an additional 20 biodeps; − Provide technical assistance to 50 coffee growers to maintain an equal number of absorption xxxxx used during harvest season. The xxxxx appropriately treat wastewater from wet mill processing and collect solids for composting or soil amendments. ▪ FEDECOCAGUA completed activities for environmental mitigation in compliance with the Environmental Monitoring and Mitigation Plan for the Coffee Value Chain as approved by USAID for RVCP (see separate report). ▪ FEDECOAG: − Worked through its Centro de Generacion y Analisis para el Diseno y Apoyo Tecnico (CAAT in Spanish) to continue publishing news bulletins on climate conditions and provide producers with timely information to plan their production schedules. − Provide PPE for 550 producers from 22 RVCP organizations and provide training on the importance of using and maintaining the equipment to avoid health hazards when in contact with chemicals. − Set up six weather stations to a) continuously monitor atmospheric conditions that could affect crops such as potatoes, sweet peas, snow peas, lima beans and cruciferous vegetables; b) provide timely information for technicians and producers on weather conditions, and c) use newsletters and brochures to distribute information on climate. − Install 88 bins to collect used pesticide containers at the 22 RVCP horticulture organizations (four bins at each) and continue coordinating wit...
Environmental Mitigation. ▪ RVCP hired a consultant to begin work on February 2, 2015 to a) increase capacity for resilience among coffee producer organizations in regard to the impacts of climate change, and b) strengthen technical and institutional capacity within ANACAFE and FEDECOCAGUA to apply technology in adapting to climate change. Deliverables include: − Yearly calendar on coffee production for each ANACAFE region including likely climate threats and mitigation strategies. The calendars will be instruments to institutionalize and disseminate RVCP experiences. − Twenty resilience plans, including strategic guidelines to face agro-climatic risks. − GAP handbook for coffee production to adapt to climate change, based on technical input from ANACAFE. The consultancy includes: − Six training workshops on resilience to climate change for 58 participants (46 coffee growers and 12 agriculture promoters) from ANACAFE organizations in San Marcos plus 195 producers from grower groups in Huehuetenango. The events covered key climate threats in coffee growing areas and identified mitigation measures for coffee growers and institutions. The workshops also produced input for GAP handbooks to adapt to climate change. ▪ Continued efforts to implement environmental mitigation measures as stipulated in the USAID-approved Environmental Mitigation Plans for coffee, horticulture and handicraft value chains, as well as for the crosscutting theme of food security and nutrition. ▪ FEDECOCAGUA activities on environmental mitigation include: − technical assistance to members of Cooperativa Coataneca to protect one of their water sources. − develop capacity on environmental issues as follows: • Protect water sources: two workshops with 80 participants, of which 12 (15%) are women. • Shade management: five workshops for 209 participants, of which 52 (25%) are women. • Soil conservation: 12 workshops for 233 participants, of which 27 (12%) are women. • Efficient water use in wet mill processing: 11 workshops for 488 participants, of which 106 (22%) are women. • Inorganic waste management (including seedling bags): two workshops for 341 participants, of which 65 (19%) are women. • Integrated pest and disease management: workshops for 166 members, of which 28 (17%) are women. • Responsible pesticide use and handling: five workshops for 94 participants, of which 21 (22%) are women. − Technical assistance for pilot projects to install three water recirculation systems at wet xxxxx operated by Cooperativa L...
Environmental Mitigation. The parties understand that the EIR was intended to be used in connection with each of the Project Approvals and Subsequent Approvals needed for the Project. Consistent with the CEQA policies and requirements applicable to the EIR, City agrees to use the EIR in connection with the processing of any Subsequent Approval to the maximum extent allowed by law and not to impose on the Project any mitigation measures or other conditions of approval other than those specifically imposed by the Project Approvals and the Mitigation Monitoring Program or specifically required by Applicable law. In addition, to the extent consistent with CEQA’s policies and requirements applicable to either Master EIRs or tiered EIRs, the City agrees to use the EIR in connection with the processing of approvals related to future expansion to the maximum extent allowed by law.
