Common use of Enforceability of Judgment Clause in Contracts

Enforceability of Judgment. Any final judgment for a fixed or readily calculable sum of money rendered by a New York Court or a Florida Court, as applicable, having jurisdiction under its own domestic laws in respect of any suit, action or proceeding against the Company based upon this Agreement, the Escrow Agreement or the Representative’s Warrants and any instruments or agreements entered into for the consummation of the transactions contemplated herein and therein would be declared enforceable against the Company, without re-examination or review of the merits of the cause of action in respect of which the original judgment was given or re-litigation of the matters adjudicated upon, by the courts of the Cayman Islands and PRC, provided that with respect to courts of the PRC, (A) adequate service of process has been effected and the defendant has had a reasonable opportunity to be heard, (B) such judgments or the enforcement thereof are not contrary to the law, public policy, security or sovereignty of the PRC, (C) such judgments were not obtained by fraudulent means and do not conflict with any other valid judgment in the same matter between the same parties and (D) an action between the same parties in the same matter is not pending in any PRC court at the time the lawsuit is instituted in a foreign court. The Company is not aware of any reason why the enforcement in the Cayman Islands or the PRC of such a New York Court judgment, or a Florida Court judgment, as applicable, would be, as of the date hereof, contrary to public policy of the Cayman Islands or PRC.

Enforceability of Judgment. Any final judgment for a fixed or readily calculable sum of money rendered by a New York Florida Court or a Florida Court, as applicable, having jurisdiction under its own domestic laws in respect of any suit, action or proceeding against the Company based upon this Agreement, the Escrow Agreement or the Representative’s Warrants and any instruments or agreements entered into for the consummation of the transactions contemplated herein and therein would be declared enforceable against the Company, without re-examination or review of the merits of the cause of action in respect of which the original judgment was given or re-litigation of the matters adjudicated upon, by xxx xxxxxx xx xxx Xxxxxx Xxxxxxx, Xxxx Xxxx and the courts of the Cayman Islands and PRC, provided that with respect to courts of the PRC, (A) adequate service of process has been effected and the defendant has had a reasonable opportunity to be heard, (B) such judgments or the enforcement thereof are not contrary to the law, public policy, security or sovereignty of the PRC, (C) such judgments were not obtained by fraudulent means and do not conflict with any other valid judgment in the same matter between the same parties and (D) an action between the same parties in the same matter is not pending in any PRC court at the time the lawsuit is instituted in a foreign court. The Company is not aware of any reason why the enforcement in the Cayman Islands Islands, Hong Kong or the PRC of such a New York Court judgment, or a Florida Court judgment, as applicable, judgment would be, as of the date hereof, contrary to public policy of the Cayman Islands Islands, Hong Kong or the PRC.

Enforceability of Judgment. Any final judgment for a fixed or readily calculable sum of money rendered by a New York Court or a Florida Court, as applicable, having jurisdiction under its own domestic laws in respect of any suit, action or proceeding against the Company based upon this Agreement, the Escrow Agreement or the Representative’s Warrants and any instruments or agreements entered into for the consummation of the transactions contemplated herein and therein would be declared enforceable against the Company, without re-examination or review of the merits of the cause of action in respect of which the original judgment was given or re-litigation of the matters adjudicated upon, by the courts of the Cayman Islands and PRC, provided that with respect to courts of the PRC, (A) adequate service of process has been effected and the defendant has had a reasonable opportunity to be heard, (B) such judgments or the enforcement thereof are not contrary to the law, public policy, security or sovereignty of the PRC, (C) such judgments were not obtained by fraudulent means and do not conflict with any other valid judgment in the same matter between the same parties and (D) an action between the same parties in the same matter is not pending in any PRC court at the time the lawsuit is instituted in a foreign court. The Company is not aware of any reason why the enforcement in the Cayman Islands or the PRC of such a New York Court judgment, judgment or a Florida Court judgment, as applicable, would be, as of the date hereof, contrary to public policy of the Cayman Islands or PRC.

Enforceability of Judgment. Any final judgment for a fixed or readily calculable sum of money rendered by a New York Court or a Florida Court, as applicable, having jurisdiction under its own domestic laws in respect of any suit, action or proceeding against the Company based upon this Agreement, the Escrow Agreement or the Representative’s Warrants Deposit Agreement and any instruments or agreements entered into for the consummation of the transactions contemplated herein and therein would be declared enforceable against the Company, without re-examination or review of the merits of the cause of action in respect of which the original judgment was given or re-litigation of the matters adjudicated upon, by the courts of the Cayman Islands and PRC, provided that (i) with respect to courts of the Cayman Islands, (A) such courts had proper jurisdiction over the parties subject to such judgment, (B) such courts did not contravene the rules of natural justice of the Cayman Islands, (C) such judgment was not obtained by fraud, (D) the enforcement of the judgment would not be contrary to the public policy of the Cayman Islands, (E) no new admissible evidence relevant to the action is submitted prior to the rendering of the judgment by the courts of the Cayman Islands, and (F) there is due compliance with the correct procedures under the laws of the Cayman Islands, and (ii) with respect to courts of the PRC, (A) adequate service any application or request for recognition and execution of process has been effected and the defendant has had a reasonable opportunity such judgment is subject to be heard, (B) such judgments or the enforcement thereof are not contrary to the law, public policy, security or sovereignty of compliance with relevant civil procedural requirements in the PRC, (C) such judgments were not obtained by fraudulent means and do not conflict with any other valid judgment in the same matter between the same parties and (D) an action between the same parties in the same matter is not pending in any PRC court at the time the lawsuit is instituted in a foreign court. The Company is not aware of any reason why the enforcement in the Cayman Islands or the PRC of such a New York Court judgment, or a Florida Court judgment, as applicable, judgment would be, as of the date hereof, contrary to public policy of the Cayman Islands or PRC.

Enforceability of Judgment. Any final judgment for a fixed or readily calculable sum of money rendered by a New York Court or a Florida Court, as applicable, having jurisdiction under its own domestic laws in respect of any suit, action or proceeding against the Company based upon this Agreement, the Escrow Agreement or the Representative’s Warrants and any instruments or agreements entered into for the consummation of the transactions contemplated herein and therein would be declared enforceable against the Company, without re-examination or review of the merits of the cause of action in respect of which the original judgment was given or re-litigation of the matters adjudicated upon, by the courts of the Cayman Islands Islands, Hong Kong and the PRC, provided that with respect to courts of the PRC, (A) adequate service of process has been effected and the defendant has had a reasonable opportunity to be heard, (B) such judgments or the enforcement thereof are not contrary to the law, public policy, security or sovereignty of the PRC, (C) such judgments were not obtained by fraudulent means and do not conflict with any other valid judgment in the same matter between the same parties and (D) an action between the same parties in the same matter is not pending in any PRC court at the time the lawsuit is instituted in a foreign court. The Company is not aware of any reason why the enforcement in the Cayman Islands Islands, Hong Kong or the PRC of such a New York Court judgment, or a Florida Court judgment, as applicable, judgment would be, as of the date hereof, contrary to public policy of the Cayman Islands Islands, Hong Kong or the PRC.

Enforceability of Judgment. Any final judgment for a fixed or readily calculable sum of money rendered by a New York Court or a Florida Court, as applicable, having jurisdiction under its own domestic laws in respect of any suit, action or proceeding against the Company based upon this Agreement, the Escrow Agreement or the Representative’s Warrants Deposit Agreement and any instruments or agreements entered into for the consummation of the transactions contemplated herein and therein would be declared enforceable recognized and enforced against the Company, without re-examination or review of the merits of the cause of action in respect of which the original judgment was given or re-litigation of the matters adjudicated upon, by an action commenced on the courts foreign judgment debt of the Grand Court of the Cayman Islands and the courts of the PRC, provided that (i) with respect to courts of the Cayman Islands, such judgment (A) is given by a foreign court of competent jurisdiction, (B) imposes on the judgment debtor a liability to pay a liquidated sum for which the judgment has been given, (C) is not in respect of taxes, a fine or a penalty, (D) the enforcement of the judgment would not be contrary to natural justice or the public policy of the Cayman Islands, (E) is a final judgment, and (ii) with respect to courts of the PRC, (A) adequate service any application or request for recognition and execution of process has been effected and the defendant has had a reasonable opportunity such judgment is subject to be heard, (B) such judgments or the enforcement thereof are not contrary to the law, public policy, security or sovereignty of compliance with relevant civil procedural requirements in the PRC, (C) such judgments were not obtained by fraudulent means and do not conflict with any other valid judgment in the same matter between the same parties and (D) an action between the same parties in the same matter is not pending in any PRC court at the time the lawsuit is instituted in a foreign court. The Company is not aware of any reason why the enforcement in the Cayman Islands or the PRC of such a New York Court judgment, or a Florida Court judgment, as applicable, judgment would be, as of the date hereof, contrary to public policy of the Cayman Islands or PRC.

Enforceability of Judgment. Any final judgment for a fixed or readily calculable sum of money rendered by a New York Court or a Florida Court, as applicable, having jurisdiction under its own domestic laws in respect of any suit, action or proceeding against the Company based upon this Agreement, the Escrow Agreement or the Representative’s Underwriters’ Warrants and any instruments or agreements entered into for the consummation of the transactions contemplated herein and therein would be declared enforceable against the Company, without re-examination or review of the merits of the cause of action in respect of which the original judgment was given or re-litigation of the matters adjudicated upon, by the courts of the Cayman Islands Islands, Taiwan, Samoa, Hong Kong and the PRC, provided that with respect to courts of the PRC, (A) adequate service of process has been effected and the defendant has had a reasonable opportunity to be heard, (B) such judgments or the enforcement thereof are not contrary to the law, public policy, security or sovereignty of the PRC, (C) such judgments were not obtained by fraudulent means and do not conflict with any other valid judgment in the same matter between the same parties and (D) an action between the same parties in the same matter is not pending in any PRC court at the time the lawsuit is instituted in a foreign court. The Company is not aware of any reason why the enforcement in the Cayman Islands Islands, Taiwan, Samoa, Hong Kong or the PRC of such a New York Court judgment, or a Florida Court judgment, as applicable, judgment would be, as of the date hereof, contrary to public policy of the Cayman Islands Islands, Taiwan, Samoa, Hong Kong or the PRC.