Electronic Voting. Notwithstanding Article 11.13, any person participating in a meeting of shareholders by telephonic, electronic, or other communication facility in accordance with these Articles and entitled to vote at the meeting may vote by means of the telephonic, electronic or other communication facility that the Corporation has made available for that purpose. Any vote at a meeting of shareholders that is held by a poll may be held entirely or partially by means of a telephonic, electronic or other communications facilities, if the directors determine to make them available, provided, in each case, that the facility:
Electronic Voting. (1) Any person entitled to attend and vote at a meeting of shareholders may vote at the meeting in person or by proxy and, subject to any determinations made from time to time by the Board, may appoint a proxy by any method permitted by law, including over the Internet, by the input of data using telephonic facilities or by reproduction using facsimile or electronic facilities.
Electronic Voting. Upon completion of applicable processes that permit parties to comment on the subject issue(s), electronic voting on matters before the membership, Board or any committee is permitted. A quorum will be determined to exist for purposes of conducting an electronic vote when NPCC receives completed ballots from two-thirds of the total number of outstanding ballots. In the event that a quorum exists for purposes of an electronic vote but the matter has not been resolved, NPCC may continue to solicit additional responses in order to resolve the matter by electronic voting.
Electronic Voting. Notwithstanding Section 8.09, any vote referred to in Section 8.08 may be held, in accordance with the Act, partially or entirely by electronic means, telephone or other communication facility, if the Corporation has made available such a facility. Any person participating in a meeting of shareholders under Section 8.02 or 8.03 and entitled to vote at the meeting may vote, in accordance with the Act by electronic means, telephone or other communication facility that the Corporation has made available such purpose.
Electronic Voting. Provided it is permitted by law, the Company may permit, in relation to a particular meeting of Bondholders or generally:
Electronic Voting. Upon completion of applicable processes that permit parties to comment on the subject issue(s), electronic voting on matters before the Members, Board or any committee is permitted. A quorum will be determined to exist for purposes of conducting an electronic vote when NPCC receives completed ballots from two-thirds (2/3) of the total number of outstanding ballots. In the event that a quorum exists for purposes of an electronic vote but the matter has not been resolved, NPCC may continue to solicit additional responses in order to resolve the matter by electronic voting. In the event that quorum has not been achieved for purposes of an electronic vote, NPCC may continue to solicit electronic ballots, including abstentions, to obtain quorum and resolve the matter.
Electronic Voting. In Person Voting (Feb 25th to Feb 29th) • Mail-in Ballot Voting For more information on the Ratification Vote Process, please contact Xxx Xxxxxxxxx, Ratification Vote Manager. QUESTIONS? • For more information on the Fiscal Agreement: • xxx.xxxxxxxxxxxxxx.xx • Toll-free Information Line 0-000-000-0000 • Contact your Chief and Council or
Electronic Voting. If the Corporation chooses to make available a telephonic, electronic or other communications facility, in accordance with the Act, that permits shareholders to vote by means of such facility then, notwithstanding any other provision of the By-laws, any such shareholder entitled to vote at that meeting may vote, in accordance with the Act, by means of such facility.
Electronic Voting. E-mail seems to increase the number of interpersonal relationships people enter into, their “social connectivity” (Xxxxx & Xxxxxx, 1985), by lowering the “messaging threshold”, or psychological cost to the user, of sending a message (Xxxx et al., 1996). Messages are sent by e-mail which wouldn’t warrant a letter. This increased spontaneity means e-mail is seen as more akin to a telephone call than a written letter (Xxx, 1991). Electronic voting may be as different from our traditional concept of voting as e-mail is from traditional mail, and for the same reason – the computer makes things so easy. A FTF vote is major effort in counting. In this experiment each subject voted 168 times over a one hour period without obvious strain and many with obvious interest. The computer did all the work. Electronic voting may be the key to computer- mediated interaction (CMI) in groups, just as e-mail was the key to CMC. CMI involves group-to-group connectivity, as well as person-to-person connectivity. This requires software designed for many-to-many rather than one-to-one linkage. Many-to-many linkage If communication richness is not the key to the generation of agreement, what is? We suggest the critical feature is many-to-many (MTM) linkage - the merging of information from many individuals into a single signal that is then broadcast to all members. A physical medium like sound does this naturally - when a crowd claps, individual sounds merge into the group sound each participant hears. But while merging 100 claps creates a single powerful sound, merging 100 e-mails supporting the same view does not create a powerful e-mail (unless it be powerfully long, repetitive and boring). MTM interaction can be dynamic, as in a choir where the individual continuously affects the group sound, and the group sound continuously affects the individual. Such groups singing unaccompanied often slowly change key, but it is common experience they always do so together. Electronic voting can achieve the same effects, but in a way quite different from the traditional vote, which is a single, isolated, and occasional activity, carried out in formal anonymity, and used only when groups can’t agree by other means. Most current groupware voting seems designed on the concept of a formal, rational vote. Position information, if available at all, is buried in menus, not available at the moment of voting, or not in the form of a group position (e.g. mean of 4.3 vs “Slightly Agree”). Voting is is...
Electronic Voting. The Committee voted unanimously to recommend that the Town explore the viability of utilizing electronic voting for Town Meetings, as a way to improve accuracy, save time and increase accountability to the public. Comment At least 30 Town Meetings in Massachusetts currently use electronic voting. The Committee expects that electronic voting would increase the accuracy and speed of voting. The need for manual counts of vote would be eliminated, which could be a substantial time saver. The Committee recommends an electronic voting systems which displays and makes a record of the votes of each member. That type of system would increase the accountability of elected Town Meeting members. A preliminary survey indicates that the system would have a onetime cost of $10,000 to $15,000. Leasing or renting systems is also an option. The Committee recognizes this is a complex issue but it encourages town management to actively explore the viability of electronic voting.
