Effect of Dispute Resolution on Introduction of Technological Change Clause Samples

Effect of Dispute Resolution on Introduction of Technological Change. Technological change shall not be introduced by the Employer until the matter, including any question as to whether or not the change in dispute is in fact technological change, has been resolved by agreement under Article 6.06 or arbitration. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Employer may introduce the technological change nine (9) months after the notice in Article 6.02 was given.
View SourceView Similar (29)
Effect of Dispute Resolution on Introduction of Technological Change. Technological change shall not be introduced by the University until the matter is resolved by agreement or arbitration.
View SourceView Similar (17)
Effect of Dispute Resolution on Introduction of Technological Change. Ninety (90) days from the date of notification, the College may proceed with the planned technological change pending resolution by agreement or by arbitration of the dispute.
View SourceView Similar (11)
Effect of Dispute Resolution on Introduction of Technological Change. Technological change shall not be introduced by the Employer until the matter is resolved by agreement or arbitration.
View SourceView Similar (4)
Effect of Dispute Resolution on Introduction of Technological Change. Ninety (90) days from the date of notification, the College may proceed with the planned technological change pending resolution by agreement or by arbitration of the dispute. ARTICLE 18 - CONTRACTING OUT - (See Article 10 - Additional Limitation on Contracting Out - Support Staff Common Agreement) The Employer agrees not to contract out any work presently performed by employees covered in this Agreement which would result in the laying off of such employees or the failure to recall employees which are qualified in performing the work to be contracted out.
View SourceView Similar (2)
Effect of Dispute Resolution on Introduction of Technological Change. Nothing in Article 5 shall affect the College's right to improve its service to its clients in ways which the College deems to be appropriate. It is agreed that Section 74 of the Industrial Relations Act is not intended to apply to the parties.
View Source
Effect of Dispute Resolution on Introduction of Technological Change. Technological change shall not be introduced by the College until the matter, including any question as to whether or not the cha*************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************** *************************** ******d recall set out in Article 7.
View Source

Related to Effect of Dispute Resolution on Introduction of Technological Change

  • Dispute Resolution and Governing Law 14.1 Any dispute, controversy, disagreement or claim of any kind whatsoever arising out of or in connection with or relating to this Agreement or the breach, termination or invalidity hereof (the “Dispute”), shall be submitted to final and binding arbitration at the request of any of the disputing Parties upon written notice to that effect to the other Parties. In the event of such arbitration: 14.1.1 the arbitration shall be through arbitration administered by the Singapore International Arbitration Center (“SIAC”) in accordance with the provisions of the arbitration rules of the SIAC, in force at the relevant time (which is deemed to be incorporated into this Agreement by reference); 14.1.2 all proceedings of such arbitration shall be in the English language. The seat of the arbitration shall be Singapore and the venue of the arbitration shall be Mumbai; 14.1.3 the arbitration shall be conducted before a tribunal (“Tribunal”) which consists of 3 (three) arbitrators. The claimant(s) shall nominate one arbitrator in the notice of arbitration. The respondent(s) shall nominate one arbitrator in the response to the notice of arbitration. The two party-nominated arbitrators shall then have twenty (20) days to agree, in consultation with the parties to the arbitration, upon the nomination of a third arbitrator to act as presiding arbitrator of the tribunal, barring which the President of SIAC shall select the third arbitrator (or any arbitrator that claimant(s) or respondent(s) fail to nominate in accordance with the foregoing); 14.1.4 the award rendered by the Tribunal shall, in addition to dealing with the merits of the case, fix the costs of the arbitration (which includes the Tribunal’s fees) and decide which of the parties thereto shall bear such costs or in what proportions such costs shall be borne by such parties; 14.1.5 arbitration awards shall be reasoned awards and shall be final and binding on the disputing Parties; 14.1.6 this arbitration agreement shall be governed by the Laws of Singapore. It is expressly agreed that: (a) provisions of Part I of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (India) will not apply to this arbitration agreement; and

  • Governing Law; Dispute Resolution (a) This Limited Guarantee shall be interpreted, construed and governed by and in accordance with the Laws of the State of New York without regard to the conflicts of law principles thereof that would subject such matter to the Laws of another jurisdiction other than the State of New York. (b) Any disputes, actions and proceedings against any party or arising out of or in any way relating to this Limited Guarantee shall be submitted to the Hong Kong International Arbitration Centre (the “HKIAC”) and resolved in accordance with the Arbitration Rules of HKIAC in force at the relevant time (the “Rules”) and as may be amended by this Section 10(b). The place of arbitration shall be Hong Kong. The official language of the arbitration shall be English and the arbitration tribunal shall consist of three arbitrators (each, an “Arbitrator”). The claimant(s), irrespective of number, shall nominate jointly one Arbitrator; the respondent(s), irrespective of number, shall nominate jointly one Arbitrator; and a third Arbitrator will be nominated jointly by the first two Arbitrators and shall serve as chairman of the arbitration tribunal. In the event the claimant(s) or respondent(s) or the first two Arbitrators shall fail to nominate or agree on the joint nomination of an Arbitrator or the third Arbitrator within the time limits specified by the Rules, such Arbitrator shall be appointed promptly by the HKIAC. The arbitration tribunal shall have no authority to award punitive or other punitive-type damages. The award of the arbitration tribunal shall be final and binding upon the disputing parties. Any party to an award may apply to any court of competent jurisdiction for enforcement of such award and, for purposes of the enforcement of such award, the parties irrevocably and unconditionally submit to the jurisdiction of any court of competent jurisdiction and waive any defenses to such enforcement based on lack of personal jurisdiction or inconvenient forum. (c) Notwithstanding the foregoing, the parties hereto consent to and agree that in addition to any recourse to arbitration as set out in Section 10(b), any party may, to the extent permitted under the Laws of the jurisdiction where application is made, seek an interim injunction from a court or other authority with competent jurisdiction and, notwithstanding that this Agreement is governed by the Laws of the State of New York, a court or authority hearing an application for injunctive relief may apply the procedural Law of the jurisdiction where the court or other authority is located in determining whether to grant the interim injunction. For the avoidance of doubt, this Section 10(c) is only applicable to the seeking of interim injunctions and does not restrict the application of Section 10(b) in any way.