Design and Analysis Sample Clauses
Design and Analysis. [*** ***] shall conduct analyses and verify the design of [*** ***] to accommodate and successfully [*** ***] system. Specific analyses planned are listed below.
3.1.1 [*** ***] Planning [*** ***] shall conduct planning and analyses to support [*** ***]. The output of this planning shall be the [*** ***]. [*** ***] shall perform [*** ***] which shall support performance, [*** ***]. The output of this task is a report describing [*** ***]. [*** ***] shall perform [*** ***]. The output of this task is a report summarizing the results of this analysis and highlighting any issues or concerns. [*** ***] shall perform a [*** ***] all phases of this mission. The output of this task is a [*** ***], as defined in the [*** ***], with the [*** ***].
3.1.2 [*** ***] [*** ***] shall perform [*** ***]. Final due dates of the [*** ***] provided data and [*** ***] provided [*** ***] shall be mutually agreed to in the [*** ***]. [*** ***] shall perform [*** ***] to determine the [*** ***]. The [*** ***] test [*** ***] shall be provided by [*** ***] for the purposes of this analysis. This analysis shall include a recommendation for [*** ***]. [*** ***] will provide a time history of relevant [*** ***] by which [*** ***] can perform [*** ***] analyses. Assumptions for the [*** ***] will be discussed during [*** ***] meetings. [*** ***] shall provide [*** ***] for the [*** ***] with a [*** ***] factor. [*** ***] is responsible for ensuring [*** ***] can withstand this environment. [*** ***] will provide [*** ***] with the relevant [*** ***] prior to and during launch, including the [*** ***] environment. [*** ***] will be responsible for ensuring the [*** ***] does not cause a hazardous condition while exposed to this environment. [*** ***] will provide [*** ***] the [*** ***] will be responsible for ensuring [*** ***] does not cause a hazardous condition while exposed to this environment. PAGE Confidential treatment has been requested for portions of this exhibit. The copy filed herewith omits the information subject to a confidentiality request. Omissions are designated [*** ***]. A complete version of this exhibit has been filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission. [*** ***] will provide [*** ***] the [*** ***] environment. [*** ***] will be responsible for ensuring [*** ***] does not cause a hazardous condition while exposed to this environment
Design and Analysis. 1. The ENGINEER will obtain traffic and access data and will evaluate both construction impacts and inundation impacts for each bridge or culvert. This will include evaluating traffic data provided by NCTCOG and ▇▇▇▇▇▇ County, as well as school bus routes, industrial access, emergency access, and feasible alternate routes.
2. The ENGINEER will visit each site and evaluate the structural adequacy of existing conditions to determine how existing conditions will impact prioritizing of the projects.
3. The ENGINEER will review the preliminary FEMA D-FIRM maps to account for anticipated changes in the effective floodplain.
4. The ENGINEER will conduct a hydrologic analysis of each crossing to determine the peak flows impacting the structure. This analysis will be sufficiently detailed for final design. Depending on the size and character of the contributing watershed, this analysis will be conducted using either the Rational Method or a Unit Hydrograph method. Most of the structures will require analysis using Unit Hydrograph methods.
5. The ENGINEER will develop models for hydraulic analysis using HEC-RAS of each crossing structure. These models will be based on available aerial topographic data, field observations and a design survey provided by ▇▇▇▇▇▇ County. Existing conditions will be evaluated, along with possible improvement alternatives. Because these models will be based on field surveys, they will be suitable for final design. The Additional Services portion of the contract will consist of preparing construction plans based on this design.
6. The hydraulic models will be used to identify recommended crossing configurations and sizes.
7. The ENGINEER will use the available utility information to determine the impacts of existing utilities on possible improvement alternatives.
Design and Analysis. The basic ▇▇▇▇▇ underlying the design of the study is that system change evolves over time and is not static. The service system should evolve and change in each year of the Reclaiming Futures initiative. Consequently, the tracking study utilizes an interrupted time series or repeated measures design. Many key tracking variables are already available in existing juvenile probation, substance abuse, and mental health systems. These will be used to create individual event histories for each child in the Reclaiming Futures target population. Key indicators from these event histories will also be aggregated over time by specific time periods depending on the quantity of data months, quarters, or years). The event histories for data that already exist in information systems or other archival records will be constructed for youth who were in the juvenile probation system and met target population criteria prior to implementation of Reclaiming Futures. These data will then be collected throughout the life of Reclaiming Futures. In each year the service system will evolve and change, leading to potential differences in system navigation histories and in key indicators. There are a range of indicators that can be aggregated from the event histories, including but not limited to: proportion of family conferences conducted, numbers of contacts with natural helpers, use of alternatives to incarceration, increased use of strength based service strategies, and increased us of a coordinated and integrated assessment process. Changes in the system due to reclaiming futures will be assessed in coordination and collaboration with the Urban Institute national evaluation, and will track the timing of key reforms in the service system to allow for analysis of the relationships between service system reforms and critical events. Table 3 provides a theoretical and simplified example of how data might look when information from the national evaluation and from event histories are combined. For example, the Urban Institute evaluation may provide an indicator of the perceived integration of substance abuse and juvenile probation services in the County. One consequence of this integration may be increased use of a standardized assessment process that includes substance abuse (in this case the Global Appraisal of Individual Needs or GAIN). Year UI Substance Abuse and Justice System Integration Proportion of Juvenile Justice Youth receiving GAIN SC Enhanced Evaluation This pattern wou...