Decision No Sample Clauses

Decision No. I has the meaning referred to in Section 1.5 hereof;
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Decision No. 71 300 13 Plaintiff, the Arizona Corporation Commission and Defendant Xxxx Xxxxxx, hereby 14 stipulate to entry of the attached Judgment, 15 Dated this day of October, 2009. I 16 17 ARIZONA CORPORATION COMMISSION 19 B y Xxxxx Xxx 20 Attorney for the Arizona Corporation Commission Dated this day of October, 2009. I 22 23 By Xxxx Xxxxxx 24 25 26 F »I Docket No. S-03491A-02-0000 1 ORIGINAL of the foregoing e-filed this day of October, 2009 with: Clerk of the Maricopa County Superior Court Copies of the foregoing mailed 4 this day of October, 2009 to:
Decision No. 71300 Upon stipulation of Plaintiff, the Arizona Corporation Commission ("Commission") and Defendant Xxxx Xxxxxx ("Xxxxxx") and good cause appearing: 16 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED pursuant to A.R.S. § 44-2032 Kesley shall be permanently enjoined from violations of the Arizona Securities Act, A.R.S. §44-1801 et seq. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that judgment shall be entered in favor of the Commission against Xxxx Xxxxxx in the amount of $135,000 for restitution. 20 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that pursuant to A.R.S. § 44-2037, civil penalty shall be imposed against Xxxx Xxxxxx in the amount of $20,000. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that pursuant to A.R.S. § 44-2032, civil penalty for contempt of a prior Commission order shall be imposed against Xxxx Xxxxxx in the amount of $20,000. 25 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Commission and Xxxxxx shall bear their own attorneys' fees and costs. . - Docket No. S-03491A-02-0000 1 IT IS FURTHER ORDRED that interest shall accrue on all damages at the legal rate of 2 ten percent per annum Hom date of entry of this Judgment until fully paid.
Decision No. W 29/2000 of The Environmental Court dated at Wellington on May 16, 2000, refusing application for a rehearing of The Environmental Court's Decision No. W 5/2000 which awarded costs to Marabella Enterprises Limited in the case of Te Ohu O Nga Taongx Xxxxx Xanu versus The Stratford District Council and Marabella Enterprises.
Decision No. 57924 - Interruptible Report Filing (upon transfer of generation assets).

Related to Decision No

  • Decision The decision by the arbitrator shall be rendered within thirty (30) days after the close of the hearing. Decisions by the arbitrator in cases properly before him shall be final and binding upon the parties, subject, however, to the limitations of arbitration decisions as provided by the P.E.L.R.A.

  • Decision Making All decisions of each Committee shall be made by unanimous vote, with each Party’s representatives collectively having one (1) vote. If after reasonable discussion and good faith consideration of each Party’s view on a particular matter before a Committee, the representatives of the Parties cannot reach an agreement as to such matter within thirty (30) days after such matter was brought to such Committee for resolution or after such matter has been referred to such Committee, such disagreement shall be referred to the JSC (in the case of disagreement of the JRDC), the JEC (in the case of disagreement of the JSC), or the Chief Executive Officers of Miragen and the Chief Executive Officer of Servier or its designee (the “Executive Officers”) (in the case of disagreement of the JEC) for resolution. If the Executive Officers cannot resolve such matter within thirty (30) days after such matter has been referred to them, then [*] that is the subject of the dispute [*]. For clarity, if the Executive Officers cannot resolve such a matter that pertains to [*], [*] will not be obligated to [*] and [*]. For further clarity, if the Executive Officers cannot resolve such a matter that pertains to [*], neither Party shall be obligated to [*] and [*]. Notwithstanding the foregoing provision and any provision to the contrary, [*] shall have the final say with respect to any decision which involves [*] (including, by way of example, [*], whether [*], or whether [*]), and neither Party shall be obligated to [*] on account of [*] for which [*] has exercised such final say unless [*] agreed on by the JSC, JEC or Executive Officers and [*]. [*] = Certain confidential information contained in this document, marked by brackets, is filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to Rule 406 of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.

  • Decision-Making Authority BMS shall have the sole decision-making authority for the operations and Commercialization strategies and decisions, including funding and resourcing, related to the Commercialization of Products; provided that such decisions are not inconsistent with the express terms and conditions of this Agreement, including BMS’ diligence obligations set forth in Section 5.1.

  • Decision of Board ‌ The decision of the majority shall be the decision of the Board. Where there is no majority decision, the decision of the Chair shall be the decision of the Board. The decision of the Arbitration Board shall be final, binding, and enforceable on the parties. The Board shall have the power to dispose of a discharge or discipline grievance by any arrangement which it deems just and equitable. However, the Board shall not have the power to change this agreement or to alter, modify, or amend any of its provisions.

  • Investment Decision The Purchaser understands that nothing in the Agreement or any other materials presented to the Purchaser in connection with the purchase and sale of the Shares constitutes legal, tax or investment advice. The Purchaser has consulted such legal, tax and investment advisors as it, in its sole discretion, has deemed necessary or appropriate in connection with its purchase of the Shares.

  • Decision on Review A decision on review of a denied claim shall be made in the following manner:

  • Independent Decision The Investor is not relying on the Issuer or on any legal or other opinion in the materials reviewed by the Investor with respect to the financial or tax considerations of the Investor relating to its investment in the Shares. The Investor has relied solely on the representations and warranties, covenants and agreements of the Issuer in this Agreement (including the exhibits and schedules hereto) and on its examination and independent investigation in making its decision to acquire the Shares.

  • Company Determination Final Any determination that the Company or the Board of Directors must make pursuant to this Article is conclusive.

  • Initial Decision Maker The Architect will serve as the Initial Decision Maker pursuant to Article 15 of AIA Document A201–2017, unless the parties appoint below another individual, not a party to this Agreement, to serve as the Initial Decision Maker. (If the parties mutually agree, insert the name, address and other contact information of the Initial Decision Maker, if other than the Architect.) « » « » « » « »

  • Independent Investment Decision Such Purchaser has independently evaluated the merits of its decision to purchase the Shares pursuant to the Agreement, and such Purchaser confirms that it has not relied on the advice of any other Purchaser’s business and/or legal counsel in making such decision. Such Purchaser has not relied on the business or legal advice of the Company or any of its agents, counsel or Affiliates in making its investment decision hereunder, and confirms that none of such Persons has made any representations or warranties to such Purchaser in connection with the transactions contemplated by the Transaction Documents.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.