Data and Intelligence Clause Samples

Data and Intelligence. ‌‌‌ 5.1 Key performance indicators (KPIs) and screening standards 5.2 Data collection, monitoring and reporting

Data and Intelligence. ‌ 13 National Standards and Quality Assurance‌

Data and Intelligence. The collection, analysis and comparison of good quality data is critical for the all NHS screening programmes in England. Monthly data is provided by PHE to NHS England as part of the data sharing agreement for Section 7a screening services, to support the monitoring of bowel cancer screening programme. PHE Screening aims to develop a consistent approach to data collection and reporting across all screening programmes and is committed to making sure that stakeholders have access to: • reliable and timely information about the quality of the screening programme • data at local, regional and national level • quality measures across the screening pathway without gaps or duplications BCSS uses personal details from GP practice registration just before people become eligible to invite them to participate in the programme. The Secretary of State for Health has given special permission to do this on the basis that cancer screening is in the public interest (Section 251 of the NHS Act 2006). The NHS BCSP is reliant on GP practices cleansing their practice lists to provide accurate information that is then automatically shared with BCSS, to ensure the eligible population is invited to the programme at the correct time. Data is collected on each screening ‘episode’ while people remain eligible. Data on clinicians involved in the screening process are also collected to ensure the programme maintains the highest clinical standards. Where people move outside England and de-register from their GP practice, BCSS retains their data in case they return in the future and need to be screened again. When people reach the age where routine screening ceases (their 75th birthday) their data is retained in case they decide to self-refer (opt in) to the programme. Data from the programme is used to assure the quality and safety of screening and to evaluate and improve the way the screening process works. Data may be shared with university research departments where they have the legal and ethical permission to access it. This is overseen by PHE’s Research Advisory Committee (RAC) and the Office of Data Release (ODR). The NHS national data opt out should be applied to any personal data used as part of the bowel cancer screening programme which is shared for research.

Data and Intelligence. The collection, analysis and comparison of good quality data is critical for the all NHS screening programmes in England. PHE Screening aims to develop a consistent approach to data collection and reporting across all screening programmes and is committed to making sure that stakeholders have access to: reliable and timely information about the quality of the screening programme data at local, regional and national level quality measures across the screening pathway without gaps duplications Performance thresholds are selected to align with existing screening standards and service objectives; 1 or 2 thresholds are specified. The acceptable threshold is the lowest level of performance which screening services are expected to attain to assure patient safety and service effectiveness. All screening services should exceed the acceptable threshold and agree service improvement plans to meet the achievable threshold. Screening services not meeting the acceptable threshold are expected to put in place recovery plans to deliver rapid and sustained improvement. The achievable threshold represents the level at which the screening service is likely to be running optimally. All screening services should aspire to attain and maintain performance at or above this level.

Data and Intelligence. Previously CDRPs have produced three year crime and disorder reduction strategies based on triennial audits of community safety. The new requirements for the establishment of the County Strategy Group, rolling plans refreshed annually and JSIAs has necessitated developing a new process – one more heavily reliant on data sharing – in particular data sharing at the county level. Forum response and activity: The Forum will: Continue to support the efforts of the Data and Intelligence JCG Through the D&I JCG, develop an information sharing protocol – using the existing Information Sharing Framework of the NYSP that takes account of the operating context of individual partner’s (e.g. the MOPI guidelines to which the Police must conform) Work with the newly developed performance and Research Unit of the County Council to ensure understanding of the needs of CDRPs and seek – through a continuation of the work already **** by an independent consultant on behalf of partners – to develop more cost effective and efficient information sharing processes. To use these new processes to better inform the development of the 2008 JSIAs – including agreeing a common template and ensuring the engagement of all colleagues. Use the influence of the members of the Forum to consider the information sharing technologies available across the county and ensure – where possible – that all partners seek to move to implement compatible systems. To support the CDRPs in maintaining and where possible developing current analytical capacity, marrying these developments to take advantage of the implementation of the County Council’s P&R unit and other initiatives undertaken on behalf of Data and Intelligence by the Forum Continue to lobby Government Office and other central agencies for additional resources to support the development of data and information capacity across the county and encouraging local and national Government representatives to lobby for the same cause To maintain an outward perspective to capture emerging issues of best practice in data sharing, intelligence gathering and analysis and be prepared to champion the work of practitioners within the county To ensure all partners contribute effectively to, and engage with the Data & Intelligence forum to enable it to operate effectively. To take a leading role in tackling barriers to inclusion and holding partners to account where necessary. To effectively manage data and intelligence to ensure that all members of the Forum c...

Data and Intelligence. ‌‌‌ 5.1 Key performance indicators (KPIs) and screening standards 5.2 Data collection, monitoring and reporting i. all antenatal laboratories, ii. all newborn laboratories • (iii) the DNA laboratories (PND) including data on pregnancy outcomes for those women who have undergone PND

Data and Intelligence