Costing Sample Clauses
The Costing clause defines how costs related to a contract or project will be calculated, allocated, and managed between the parties involved. It typically outlines the types of expenses covered, the method for determining costs (such as fixed price, time and materials, or reimbursable expenses), and the process for submitting and approving cost-related documentation. By establishing clear rules for cost management, this clause helps prevent disputes over payments and ensures transparency and fairness in financial dealings.
Costing. The cost of application support, application software updates and free change and features requests is set out in the application provider’s rate sheets which are normally communicated to the ‘Client’ and/or published on the Dynasoft Website. Costing for the first year is usually set at the same level for all the service provider’s clients. For subsequent years, the amount paid can vary depending on the amount of support the ‘Client’ needed during the previous year. Variations are set at the discretion of the ‘service provider’ but are always kept as low as possible. Final costing due for the ‘application support’ is always submitted to the ‘Client’ in order to seek his/her agreement. Generally, costing from year to year increases by 7% to account for inflation in labour costs and materials.
Costing. Designer will provide estimated FOB costing for each Product at the time first prototype samples are delivered. Designer will provide firm FOB costing for each Product at the time final sales samples are delivered based on estimated production order quantities communicated by the company and any adjustments made after first prototype samples by the Designer.
Costing. Estimated cost of one Dar-ul-Ehsaas is around Rs.22.059 million . Breakup is as under: -
i. Development/capital cost - Rs.8.275 million (to be incurred after approval of the Managing Director for purchases beyond Rs 40,000/-)
Costing. A representative number of patient episodes are costed. This information is used for developing the classification system and for the pricing model. The pricing model determines how much is paid for an average patient. The pricing model needs to adequately recognise factors that increase the cost of care that may not be picked up in the classification system, for example the additional cost of providing health services in remote areas, or to children. IHPA is a corporate Commonwealth entity, within the Department of Health portfolio. The Pricing Authority is a body corporate consisting of a Chair, Deputy Chair, and up to seven other members. The Chair of the Pricing Authority reports directly to the Minister for Health. The Chief Executive Officer is responsible for the day-to-day management of IHPA and its staff. To acheive its annual Work Program, IHPA works in collaboration with all Australian governments, advisory committees, key stakeholders and the public.
Costing evaluate the costs and cost-effectiveness of the GHS The component of the evaluation that is of most relevant to the Get Healthy Service as a campaign referral destination under the National Prevention Partnership is impact evaluation. Information is collected at baseline, week 12, week 26 and follow up at week 52 to assess behavioural changes. All coaching participants have information collected by the coaches at week 0, week 12 and week 26; further the University of Sydney also undertake an independent follow up study with a cohort of service users where information is collected at week 0, week 12 and week 52.
Costing. Estimated cost of one PBM Old Home is around Rs.15 million. Breakup is as under: - i. Development/capital cost - ii. Annual operational cost - iii. Contingencies - Total - Rs.5.0780 million Rs.14.6709 million. Rs.1.6235 million Rs.21.3724 million Summary of estimated cost is attached at Annex-C.
Costing. The cost of application support and application software updates are set out in the application provider’s rate sheets which are normally communicated to the ‘Client’ and/or published on the Dynasoft Website.
Costing. Costing FP is a recognized area of need. In preparation for a 2011 international technical working group meeting composed of donors, international cooperating agencies and developing country representatives and hosted by MEASURE Evaluation PRH, a guidance report on methods for estimating the costs of FP was developed with recommendations for what to measure when costing FP programs, how to measure it, and how to perform the cost calculations. The document contains two background methodology papers, one on estimating the unit costs of FP and the other on projecting the costs of FP programming.
Costing. Landlord shall provide the Landlord Provided Food Services at a discount of twenty percent (20%) off of Landlord’s standard menu prices.
Costing. SLAs are based on Performance Based Financing (PBF). PBF is a payment modality whereby a fee is paid for quality services rendered by a health facility. All-in estimates of particular services are standardized, based on actual market prices (e.g. CMST, private pharmacies, etc.) and the average cost of these services of a representative sample of CHAM health facilities. Overhead costs such as utility expenses, fuel etc. is included in the costing, based on the SLA-client ratio. Costing of services is subject to a yearly review by the MOH in consultation with CHAM and is based on market price development of essential drugs and commodities. Review of the services cost may also be done within a year when there is a major economic change translating into an inflation rate of 30% or more.