Contradiction Clause Samples

A Contradiction clause defines how conflicts between different provisions within a contract are to be resolved. Typically, it establishes a hierarchy among the contract documents or specifies which provision will prevail if there is an inconsistency. For example, if the main agreement and an attached schedule contain conflicting terms, the clause may state that the main agreement takes precedence. This ensures clarity and prevents disputes by providing a clear method for resolving ambiguities or contradictions within the contract.
POPULAR SAMPLE Copied 97 times
Contradiction. In the event of any contradiction between a Contractor Schedule and another part of this Agreement, the other part will prevail.
Contradiction. This APA shall govern the subject matter thereof and supersedes the Agreement and the First Amendment in all respects and on the Closing Date the Agreement and the First Amendment shall be null and void with no further force and effect (except for the reference made herein).
Contradiction. In the event of a contradiction between a purchaser’s order and the Company’s subsequent Acknowledgement of that purchase order, the Acknowledgement shall take precedent.
Contradiction. Should any contradiction arise between the requirements in the LEP’s Constitution and this Partnership Agreement, the requirements of the LEP’s Constitution take precedence.
Contradiction. If there is any contradiction between this Subcontract and the Main Agreement, the terms and conditions of the Main Agreement shall take precedence.
Contradiction. 11.1. If there is any contradiction between this Agreement and the Main Agreement, the terms and conditions of the Main Agreement shall take precedence to the extent of such contradiction.
Contradiction. Even though ▇▇▇▇▇▇ would have denied that he employed the use of the ontological argument, his critics claimed that he “…effectively resuscitated that argument in declaring necessity antecedently the cause, ground and foundation of God’s existence.”68 On the surface, it appears that ▇▇▇▇▇▇’▇ critics were correct in their assessment of his argument. ▇▇▇▇▇▇’▇ argument has two clear stages. The first stage proceeds as follows:
Contradiction. If there is any contradiction or conflict between this Guarantee and the Loan Agreement, the relevant provisions of the Loan Agreement shall prevail.
Contradiction. If any of the Security Principles contained in Schedule 9 (Security Principles) are in contradiction with any provision of any Security Document, the provision of the Security Document shall prevail. Clause 1.3 (Corporate benefit restrictions) shall apply.