Contexts of interference Sample Clauses

Contexts of interference. We turn now to the opposite case: consider a context C˜ where remembering X is detrimental to the agent’s chances of making the correct choice, due to interference effects. Using the same notation (with C replaced by C˜) and assumptions as in the previous section, we can see that again ∆E[u | sX, X, C˜] = N (C˜)[π(sX) − π(0)]. (4.23) threshold κ, such that if the agent’s credence P (X) exceeds κ then she will make the best decision 4A further possible justification is to consider a simple generic decision scenario that could represent X’s context of relevance. In any such setup, decision theory will prescribe some fixed no more information, it is standard to use a uniform prior for κ between zero and one (following P (X), meaning that the agent’s chance of success π(0) = P (X). (P (X) being the key quantity since we are ex hypothesi in a context of relevance of X). With the principle of insufficient reason). In that case, the chance that κ is less than P (X) is exactly { } As before, appreciating that there may be multiple interference contexts C˜j , the second half of eq. (4.12) can be expressed as: j ∆E[ut(w) | sX, X, interferes] f (interferes) = Σ N (C˜j )[πj(sX) − πj(0)] f (C˜j ). ( ) − ( ) (4.24) ( ) < ( ) − ( ) Once again, the challenge now is to determine how πj sX πj 0 scales with sX; once again, we will – for simplicity – consider a single context of interference, and drop the subscript X as implicit. Hence the question revolves around the behaviour of ∆π s π s π 0 in interference contexts . Our reasoning for this can follow an almost identical line to that in the previous section, with one crucial difference. Recall that for contexts of relevance, retrieval of X ensured success – thus if X was retrieved on any attempt, success was guar- anteed. By contrast, in interference contexts, retrieval of X impedes success – if X is retrieved on every attempt then the agent will fail. Since the probability of success in a context of interference if the agent retrieves X on every attempt is zero (since then the interference has been complete), we can express the probability of success in general as just
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to Contexts of interference

  • Interference Lessee shall use the Facility in a manner which shall not cause interference with the use or occupancy of the other portions of the Building by Lessor or others in any way. Lessee's use hereunder will be done in such a manner so as not to interfere with or impose any additional expense upon Lessor in maintaining the Building.

  • Interference or Impairment If a Party (“Impaired Party”) reasonably determines that the services, network, facilities, or methods of operation, of the other Party (“Interfering Party”) will or are likely to interfere with or impair the Impaired Party’s provision of services or the operation of the Impaired Party’s network or facilities, the Impaired Party may interrupt or suspend any Service provided to the Interfering Party to the extent necessary to prevent such interference or impairment, subject to the following:

  • Enforcement of Intellectual Property Rights I will cooperate fully with the Company, both during and after my employment with the Company, with respect to the procurement, maintenance and enforcement of Intellectual Property Rights in Company-Related Developments. I will sign, both during and after the term of this Agreement, all papers, including without limitation copyright applications, patent applications, declarations, oaths, assignments of priority rights, and powers of attorney, which the Company may deem necessary or desirable in order to protect its rights and interests in any Company-Related Development. If the Company is unable, after reasonable effort, to secure my signature on any such papers, I hereby irrevocably designate and appoint each officer of the Company as my agent and attorney-in-fact to execute any such papers on my behalf, and to take any and all actions as the Company may deem necessary or desirable in order to protect its rights and interests in any Company-Related Development.

  • Use of Intellectual Property The Adviser grants to the Sub-Adviser a sublicense to use the trademarks, service marks, logos, names, or any other proprietary designations of the Adviser (“AdvisorShares Marks”) on a non-exclusive basis. The Sub-Adviser will acquire no rights in the AdvisorShares Marks, and all goodwill of the AdvisorShares Marks shall inure to and remain with the Adviser. The Sub-Adviser agrees that neither it, nor any of its affiliates, will knowingly in any way refer directly or indirectly to its relationship with the Trust, the Fund(s), the Adviser or any of their respective affiliates or use AdvisorShares Marks in offering, marketing or other promotional materials without the prior express written consent of the Adviser, which approval will not be unreasonably withheld or delayed, except as required by rule, regulation or upon the request of a governmental authority. Notwithstanding the forgoing, the Sub-Adviser and its affiliates may, without obtaining the Adviser’s prior approval, refer directly or indirectly to its relationship with the Trust, the Fund(s), the Adviser or any of their respective affiliates and use AdvisorShares Marks in offering, marketing or other promotional materials provided that such materials were previously approved by the Adviser and remain in substantially the same form.

  • Unauthorised Use of Intellectual Property a) The Supplier/Service Provider agrees to notify Transnet in writing of any conflicting uses of, and applications of registrations of Patents, Designs and Trade Marks or any act of infringement, unfair competition or passing off involving the Intellectual Property of Transnet of which the Supplier/Service Provider acquires knowledge and Transnet shall have the right, as its own option, to proceed against any party infringing its Intellectual Property.

  • Court Action or Other Legal Processes (a) Notwithstanding any other law to the contrary, the liability of NYSERDA to make an interest payment to a Contractor pursuant to this Exhibit shall not extend beyond the date of a notice of intention to file a claim, the date of a notice of a claim, or the date commencing a legal action for the payment of such interest, whichever occurs first.

  • Conflict of interest and financial or other irregularities 12.1 The Recipient, and employees of the Recipient, shall be careful not to be subject to conflicts of interest.

  • Rights of use of the results and of pre-existing rights by the NA and the Union The beneficiaries grant the NA and the Union the following rights to use the results of the project:

  • Non-Interference During the Employment Period and the Post-Termination Non-Interference Period, I shall not, directly or indirectly for my own account or for the account of any other individual or entity, engage in Interfering Activities.

  • Prosecution Hospital shall be responsible for the preparation, filing, prosecution and maintenance of all patent applications and patents included in Patent Rights. Company shall reimburse Hospital for Patent Costs incurred by Hospital relating thereto in accordance with Section 4.2.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.