Contention Sample Clauses

The Contention clause defines how disputes or disagreements between parties to a contract are to be addressed and resolved. Typically, this clause outlines the procedures for raising issues, such as requiring written notice of a dispute, and may specify steps like negotiation, mediation, or arbitration before litigation can occur. Its core practical function is to provide a clear, structured process for managing conflicts, thereby minimizing disruption and reducing the risk of unresolved disputes escalating.
Contention. 4.2.1 Before implementing a contention-based system for the display and reporting of London Stock Exchange Data, Customers must contact the London Stock Exchange for written approval of their proposed system. Please note that prior approval of a contention system does not constitute acceptance of the reported number of Devices or Unique User Ids. 4.2.2 A contention system may be employed as an element of Operational Controls to allow a defined number of Devices or Unique User Ids to access London Stock Exchange Data concurrently. To conform to the requirements for contention, the Data must: a) be continuously updated – snapshot services are not permitted; b) have an auditable limit to the number of concurrent accesses; c) require all Devices or Unique User Ids to contend for access to the Data (no Devices or Unique User Ids with dedicated access to be included). 4.2.3 Any contention system that operates to include different categories of access, such as Member Professional users, Non-Member Professional users and Private Investors, must operate separate contention pools (with respective contention pool limits) for each category. 4.2.4 Please note that contended access is not permitted on ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇ ▇ ▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇. 4.2.5 Contention may not be employed on a service or system based on rapid snapshots of data that give the impression of continuously updating. 4.2.6 Once the contention limit is reached, no further accesses may be permitted until a Device or Unique User Id has logged off. 4.2.7 A Device or Unique User Id cannot be logged off automatically by the Redistributor at any point, with the exception of after the close of the trading day. Once a Device or Unique User Id has logged off, the screen must be cleared of Data and prevented from receiving further updates until the Device or Unique User Id logs on again. 4.2.8 A subscriber to a service can actively choose to assign their rights to the Redistributor to be logged off after a reasonable amount of time. One example of this is a ‘pop-up’ box that would appear after a reasonable period of inactivity asking whether the subscriber would like to be logged-off. We would also accept the subscriber agreeing to a disclaimer before accessing the service, informing them of this condition of service. 4.2.9 Billing is based on the maximum concurrent Device or Unique User Id limit. Under exceptional circumstances, where user numbers are particularly high, the contention limits may be exceeded. In this...
Contention. 4.2.1 Before implementing a contention-based system for the display and reporting of London Stock Exchange Data, Customers must contact the London Stock Exchange for written approval of their proposed system. Please note that prior approval of a contention system does not constitute acceptance of the reported number of Devices or Unique User Ids.
Contention. The bandwidth is available for each server on a dedicated, switched, full-duplex Ethernet network. This avoids any form of interference with other customers, making the bandwidth available at any time.
Contention. 37.1 If there are contentions during the performance of contract, the both sides appointed as follows: (1) Providing conciliation by (2) Adopting the 2nd solution methods and arbitrating to ------ committee applies for the arbitration lawfully or to institute legal proceedings in the Intermediate people’s court of Weihai city.
Contention. In the event of an employee being of the opinion that the collective wages are not in compliance with the minimum payment set out in subclause (2), the employee shall be entitled to take up the matter with the employer. The employee can use a union representative as an observer or, in the event of a union representative being unavailable, the local 3F branch can provide an ob- server. Should the employee not find that his/her uncertainty has been clarified, the em- ployee shall fill in a ”Request for information concerning time consumption for districts” (printed in the collective agreement) and submit this to the enterprise. The employee can use a union representative as an observer or, in the event of a union representative being unavailable, the local 3F branch can provide an ob- server. Subsequently, the enterprise must, within the period of a month, substan- tiate that the collective agreement’s provision on minimum wages has been com- plied with in respect of the employee. If, after this, the employee continues to be in disagreement as to the compliance with the collective agreement’s provision on minimum wages, the local 3F branch can become involved in the matter. For instance, the local 3F branch can attend a trial distribution in respect of the relevant districts. Should the local branch find the disputed matter to be undetermined, then any potential further consideration of the matter shall be dealt with at a mediation meeting in pursuance of clause 15, Provisions for dealing with labour disputes.
Contention based medium access: Aloha, CSMA and beyond.

Related to Contention

  • Challenge If Executive violates or challenges the enforceability of any provisions of the Restrictive Covenants or this Release, no further payments, rights or benefits under Section 5 of the Agreement will be due to Executive (except where such provision would be prohibited by applicable law, rule or regulation).

  • Complaint To commence a proceeding, the complaining party (or parties) shall provide by certified mail, return receipt requested, a written Complaint to the BCBSA Corporate Secretary (which shall also constitute service on BCBSA if it is a respondent) and to any Plan(s) and/or Controlled Affiliate(s) named therein. The Complaint shall contain:

  • Intention of the Parties The execution and delivery of this Agreement shall constitute an acknowledgment by the Seller and the Issuer that they intend that the assignment and transfer herein contemplated constitute a sale and assignment outright, and not for security, of the Receivables and Other Conveyed Property, for non-tax purposes, conveying good title thereto free and clear of any Liens, from the Seller to the Issuer, and that the Receivables and the Other Conveyed Property shall not be a part of the Seller’s estate in the event of a bankruptcy, reorganization, arrangement, insolvency or liquidation proceeding, or other proceeding under any federal or state bankruptcy or similar law, or the occurrence of another similar event, of, or with respect to the Seller. In the event that such conveyance is determined to be made as security for a loan made by the Issuer, the Noteholders or the Certificateholder to the Seller, the Seller hereby grants to the Issuer a security interest in all of the Seller’s right, title and interest in and to the following property for the benefit of the Issuer Secured Parties, whether now owned or existing or hereafter acquired or arising, and this Agreement shall constitute a security agreement under applicable law (collectively, the “Sale and Servicing Agreement Collateral”): (i) the Receivables and all moneys received thereon after the Cutoff Date; (ii) the security interests in the Financed Vehicles granted by Obligors pursuant to the Receivables and any other interest of the Seller in such Financed Vehicles; (iii) any proceeds and the right to receive proceeds with respect to the Receivables from claims on any physical damage, credit life or disability insurance policies covering Financed Vehicles or Obligors and any proceeds from the liquidation of the Receivables; (iv) any proceeds from any Receivable repurchased by a Dealer pursuant to a Dealer Agreement or a Third-Party Lender pursuant to an Auto Loan Purchase and Sale Agreement as a result of a breach of representation or warranty in the related Dealer Agreement or Auto Loan Purchase and Sale Agreement; (v) all rights under any Service Contracts on the related Financed Vehicles; (vi) the related Receivable Files; (vii) all of the Seller’s right, title and interest in its rights and benefits, but none of its obligations or burdens, under the Purchase Agreement, and the delivery requirements, representations and warranties and the cure and repurchase obligations of AmeriCredit under the Purchase Agreement; (viii) all of the Seller’s (a) Accounts, (b) Chattel Paper, (c) Documents, (d) Instruments and (e) General Intangibles (as such terms are defined in the UCC) relating to the property described in (i) through (vii); and (ix) all proceeds and investments with respect to items (i) through (viii).

  • Allegations This Settlement Agreement settles Notice of Violation (NOV) CP21- 09-02, which was issued on October 25, 2021. CARB alleged PBB violated the Consumer Products Regulation by selling, supplying, offering for sale, or manufacturing for use in California, Green Gobbler 30% Vinegar Home & Garden, that is subject to and exceeded a VOC limit of 0.5 percent by weight for the General Purpose Cleaner (nonaerosol) category and for failing to display the date of manufacture as outlined in NOV CP21-09-02. CARB alleges that if the allegations described in Paragraph 6 were proven, civil penalties could be imposed against PBB for each and every day the noncompliant product was sold, supplied, offered for sale or manufactured for use in California.

  • Intent (a) The parties recognize that each Transaction is a “repurchase agreement” as that term is defined in Section 101 of Title 11 of the United States Code, as amended (except insofar as the type of Securities subject to such Transaction or the term of such Transaction would render such definition inapplicable), and a “securities contract” as that term is defined in Section 741 of Title 11 of the United States Code, as amended (except insofar as the type of assets subject to such Transaction would render such definition inapplicable). (b) It is understood that either party’s right to liquidate Securities delivered to it in connection with Transactions hereunder or to exercise any other remedies pursuant to Paragraph 11 hereof is a contractual right to liquidate such Transaction as described in Sections 555 and 559 of Title 11 of the United States Code, as amended. (c) The parties agree and acknowledge that if a party hereto is an “insured depository institution,” as such term is defined in the Federal Deposit Insurance Act, as amended (“FDIA”), then each Transaction hereunder is a “qualified financial contract,” as that term is defined in FDIA and any rules, orders or policy statements thereunder (except insofar as the type of assets subject to such Transaction would render such definition inapplicable). (d) It is understood that this Agreement constitutes a “netting contract” as defined in and subject to Title IV of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation Improvement Act of 1991 (“FDICIA”) and each payment entitlement and payment obligation under any Transaction hereunder shall constitute a “covered contractual payment entitlement” or “covered contractual payment obligation”, respectively, as defined in and subject to FDICIA (except insofar as one or both of the parties is not a “financial institution” as that term is defined in FDICIA).