CONFORMITY CHECK Sample Clauses
A Conformity Check clause establishes the requirement for verifying that goods, services, or deliverables meet specified standards or contractual requirements before acceptance. In practice, this clause typically outlines the procedures for inspection, testing, or review, and may specify timeframes, responsible parties, and the criteria for approval or rejection. Its core function is to ensure that only compliant and satisfactory outputs are accepted, thereby protecting the receiving party from defects or non-conforming performance.
CONFORMITY CHECK. The delivery of goods by the supplier can lead to a delay in the transfer of risk and thereby to a delayed notice of defects (complaint), if any, to the supplier, because, under the “skip lot” procedure sometimes used by voestalpine, a potential defect may not be detected until the goods are withdrawn from warehouse inventory. Moreover, the scope of this inspection is solely an identity verification and completeness check in accordance with the purchase requisition, and an inspection for obvious damage (particularly damage in transit). To this extent, the supplier hereby waives the defense of belated notice of defect. This does not release the supplier from full responsibility, liability and the duty to take all necessary measures to eliminate defects in the products the supplier manufactured or placed in circulation. Under certain circumstances, not all failed parts shall be made available for analysis. In the event of defective deliveries, the supplier must take immediate remedial action. If sorting or reworking activities are necessary, voestalpine shall inform the supplier immediately. Immediately after becoming aware of this, the supplier shall decide who is to carry out the required activities (own employees, external service providers, voestalpine). If work is undertaken by voestalpine or external service providers are commissioned, the supplier must issue a written order. If the written order is not issued within the period specified by voestalpine, the necessary activities (sorting, reworking) shall be commissioned by voestalpine. The costs incurred here will be charged on, taking into account the clear question of guilt. After every complaint by the voestalpine ordering plant, measures to remedy the defect must be initiated immediately, documented and, at the request of voestalpine, submitted in structured form as an “8D Report” in accordance with the method described in VDA Volume 4 within 24 hours. In the complaint procedure, the supplier must prove that it delivered goods that were within the requirements and specifications. In general, the cause must be analyzed in detail with suitable problem-solving methods (such as ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, 5 W questions, fault simulations, etc.). If other voestalpine companies or locations are affected, the supplier must promptly inform them. Checked and conforming components that formed the basis for complaints and follow-up deliveries from warehouse inventory or work in progress that were inspected due to previous defe...
CONFORMITY CHECK. The delivery of goods by the supplier can lead to a delay in the transfer of risk and thereby to a delayed notice of defects (complaint), if any, to the supplier, because, under the “skip lot” procedure sometimes used by voestalpine, a potential defect may not be detected until the goods are withdrawn from warehouse inventory. Moreover, the scope of this inspection is solely an identity verification and completeness check in accordance with the purchase requisition, and an inspection for obvious damage, particularly damage in transit. To this extent, the supplier hereby waives the defense of belated notice of defect. This does not release the supplier from full responsibility, liability and the duty to take all necessary measures to eliminate defects in the products the supplier manufactured or placed in circulation. Under certain circumstances, not all failed parts shall be made available for analysis.