Conducting Research Clause Samples
The "Conducting Research" clause defines the rules and permissions governing how research activities may be carried out under an agreement. It typically outlines the scope of permissible research, any required approvals or ethical considerations, and the responsibilities of the parties involved, such as data handling or reporting obligations. By establishing clear guidelines for conducting research, this clause helps ensure compliance with legal, ethical, and contractual standards, thereby minimizing misunderstandings and potential disputes.
Conducting Research. Conducting research according to the protocol approved by CPHS. The relying investigators should not implement any revisions or changes to the protocol without prior approval from CPHS, except where necessary to eliminate immediate hazard(s) to research subjects. Necessary changes to the research should be communicated to the reviewing PI. The reviewing PI is responsible for handling the IRB amendment submission to the reviewing IRB.
Conducting Research. NU shall conduct the Funded Research at its own responsibility and hold Company harmless in relation to the same; provided, however, that Company shall indemnify NU for NU’s losses due to defects in the materials furnished by Company to NU. NU shall provide Company with advanced written notice when a new person at NU participates in the Funded Research as the Researcher.
Conducting Research. GCRMC complies with federal and state laws and regulations in any research, investigation and clinical trial conducted by our physicians and professional staff. Any human subject research conducted at GCRMC must be consistent with GCRMC policies. Any questions should be referred to GCRMC’s Compliance Officer.
Conducting Research. The UIW Investigator(s) will conduct research according to the approved protocol and ensure that the planned research activities are approved by the reviewing IRB prior to implementation. The UIW Investigator(s) should not implement any revisions or changes to the protocol without prior approval from the Reviewing IRB, except where necessary to eliminate immediate hazard(s) to research subjects. Necessary changes should be reported to the Non-Affiliated Investigator of the Reviewing IRB. The Non-Affiliated Investigator is responsible for handling the IRB amendment submission to the Reviewing IRB.
Conducting Research. The Non-affiliated Investigator(s) will conduct research according to the protocol approved by UIW IRB. The Non-affiliated Investigator(s) should not implement any revisions or changes to the protocol without prior approval from the UIW IRB, except where necessary to eliminate immediate hazard(s) to research subjects. Necessary changes to the research should be communicated to the UIW Investigator(s). The UIW Investigator(s) is responsible for handling the IRB amendment submission to the UIW IRB.
Conducting Research. Research activities, including economic research on the use and impact of IFRS Standards, may be undertaken from time to time.
Conducting Research. (a) Approval or consent from research participants or hosting organizations shall be gained, unless (b) below holds true.
(b) Approval or consent from research participants or hosting organizations is not required only in special cases, such as research with anonymous questionnaires or naturalistic observations.
(c) Participants will be informed about the research and its anticipated use(s), in language that is understandable to the general public.
(d) Where applicable, research participants shall be suitably protected from adverse consequences of participating in the research, including (but not limited to) potential consequences of withdrawing from the research.
(e) If inducements are offered to research participants, such inducements shall not be excessive or inappropriate.
Conducting Research. Each of the 12 students became a member of two or three study groups, for a total of 1G groups representing the 1G cities participating in the AVIAMA General Assembly. The students started research on puppet theaters in each city. English sources on the Internet 5 Japanese sources on the Internet 8 Visiting organizations 4 Japanese sources at the library 3 English sources at the library 1 Others (Interviewing on the phone) 1 According to the questionnaire, all respondents (N= 5) answered that they read English sources on the Internet (Table 2). To conduct research and gain the necessary information to make a presentation, the students had to purposefully read many English sources. Depending on the students’ needs, the teacher provided information, such as cultural organizations from each country which the students could visit, and references including websites and books they could refer to.