Condition Assessment Clause Samples

POPULAR SAMPLE Copied 1 times
Condition Assessment. The Engineer shall perform condition assessments of superstructure and substructure elements as well as foundation elements, retaining structures, appurtenances or any element that may have an adverse effect on the structure. The Engineer shall determine the appropriate method of inspection based on condition and access. Methods shall include visual, sounding, coring, thermography, Non-Destructive Testing (NDT), or other methods as needed. Engineer shall develop an inspection plan for approval by the State when traffic control is required. The Engineer shall: 1. Perform a condition assessment using methods outlined in the AASHTO Manual for Bridge Evaluation. 2. Evaluate the structures for potential presence of hazardous materials such as lead and asbestos. 3. Evaluate existing coatings on steel bridges. 4. Develop layouts of structures to help geographically identify areas with existing concerns. 5. Coordinate access to perform inspection of these elements. 6. Perform a load rating on all superstructure elements, and all substructure elements that exhibit defects that could constitute loss in capacity or were designed with outdated design loading criteria. The Engineer shall provide an inventory and operating load rating of the existing structure. Load ratings of existing structure shall be in accordance with the State’s Bridge Inspection Manual and AASHTO’s Manual for Bridge Evaluation. 7. Evaluate the most current Routine Inspection Report to identify elements that have a condition rating of less than seven.
Condition Assessment. The inspection will assess the plot. An allotment will be deemed to be ‘poor’ if one or more of the following are noted: [A] The majority of the plot is covered in weed or overgrown. [B] Less than two thirds of the plot is being cultivated with little evidence of fruit, flower or vegetable growing. [C] The allotment is unkempt and there is a large amount of clutter. [D] Non-horticultural materials are being stored / kept on site. [E] Pathways and structures are in a state of disrepair and dangerous. [F] There is evidence of animals without adequate welfare, food / water / shelter Plots deemed to be poor will be subject to the caution and eviction process below:
Condition Assessment. The Lessee is required to have a professional engineer and/or building inspector perform an assessment of the condition of the improvements within the last term of the Lease or as mutually agreed upon between the parties. The engineer/inspector shall be hired by the Lessee at ▇▇▇▇▇▇’s sole expense. Said engineer/inspector shall be approved by the Port in writing, which approval shall not be unreasonably withheld. This Condition Assessment will look at the building’s structural components, as well as items such as the electrical and plumbing systems, heating and air conditioning system, etc. If the Lessee has parking spots or aircraft ramp/apron on their leasehold that they are responsible for, then those are assessed, too. If there are major items of deferred maintenance, the Port may require that those items are addressed to the satisfaction of the Port during the term of the lease, as well as before reversion occurs. By having this assessment done on a scheduled basis during the term of a lease, it sets forth clear expectations for both parties. Should Lessee fail to remedy any items of concern within a reasonable and timely manner, the Port may deem such failure a default under the Lease.
Condition Assessment. Upon arrival and during the week of installation as works are unpackaged, Library staff will evaluate the condition of artworks. Any damage to materials will be noted and the exhibitor may be called upon to make repairs or offer other alternatives. As artworks are expected to be delivered installation-ready, wiring or other hanging systems will also be reviewed on 2D work. Any specialized instructions on 2D or 3D (regarding handling and/or installation) should be noted and communicated to library staff prior to delivery. If the exhibit coordinators are not the artists themselves, they will be expected to clearly communicate the hanging system requirements to all artists submitting work for the exhibit.
Condition Assessment. Has an assessment been carried out? □ Yes □ No Shall an impartial inspector carry out the assessment? □ Yes □ No Main conclusions of the assessment according to assessment report. ATTN: It is not mandatory to complete the form, however main conclusions shall be listed here: Reference no. Spaces Flooring Walls Ceiling Windows/frames Door/Frame Locks Lights Electric switches/outlets Cabinets Fittings Stove Oven Kitchen fan Refrigerator Sink/faucets Mirror Toilet Bathtub/faucet Shower stall/faucet Cleaning Heating Water pipes/drinking water Sewage Fire extinguishers Smoke detector Locked storage for dangerous substances 1 Foyer 2 Hall/hallway 3 Kitchen 4 Bathroom 5 Bathroom 2 6 Living room 7 Dining room 8 Master bedroom 9 Room 1 10 Room 2 11 Room 3 12 Room 4 13 Laundry room 14 Storage room 15 Intake area 1. A = good condition (Undamaged and nothing of note. Mainly applies to new or unused.) 2. B = acceptable condition (May contain scratches or stains, normal wear and tear.) 3. C = visibly worn (Damage in a few places while still acceptable with respect to years of use.) 4. D = damaged, in need of fixing (applies to damages that exceed normal wear and tear.) 5. E = damaged or ruined, needs renovation or repair (needs replacement or reparation.) 6. F = Freshly painted (applies to painted areas, such as walls and ceilings.) 7. G = Dirty, needs cleaning (if a door is f. ex. marked B/G it means the door is in order but needs cleaning.) 2. Inspector’s comments (along with reference no.)
Condition Assessment. The purpose of this task is for the Consultant to perform condition assessment of selected yard piping to help inform yard piping rehabilitation needs based on the results of these assessments. When performing the physical condition assessment inspections, Consultant shall follow all applicable health and safety protocols.
Condition Assessment. Provide comprehensive condition assessment of ANAHEIM’s water system, including seismic, structural, security and vulnerability. Assessment of the structural integrity of the pipe shall include identifying leaks, pipe damage, pipe defect, loss of pipe wall thickness due to corrosion or erosion, etc., along the length of the pipe. Provide reports and memorandums with maps and exhibits as required to detail results of the study including likelihood of failure, risk and consequence of failure. Reports and/or technical memorandums shall also include detailed explanation of data collected and used for the study, any assumptions made as well as recommendations for short-term and long-term risk mitigation strategies.
Condition Assessment. Upon request of the Water Trust, copies of the Condition Assessment forms and Depreciation Tables will be made available for review. A meeting with the Mequon Water Utility may be requested by the Mequon Water Utility prior to completing the Condition Assessment and Depreciation Valuation. For review and recommendation to the Water Utility Commission, the condition assessment is to be completed by a certified operator on behalf of the Water Trust.
Condition Assessment. A report that comprises inspection, rating, and evaluation of the existing condition of the Sanitary Sewer Collection System. Inspection is based on closed circuit television (CCTV) inspections for gravity mains; manhole inspections for structural defects; and, inspections of pipe connections at the manhole. After CCTV inspection occurs, pipe conditions are assigned a grade based on the Pipeline Assessment and Certification Program (“PACP”) rating system, developed by the National Association of Sewer Service Companies. PACP is a nationally recognized sewer pipeline condition rating system for CCTV inspections.
Condition Assessment. DocuSign Envelope ID: 888EC68A-A3F9-498B-B7A8-5CA88A8E8E22 The primary objective of Task 7 is for the Consultant to evaluate the life expectancy of the City’s sewer infrastructure (sewer pipelines, manhole, siphons, lift stations, and water reclamation facilities, etc.) and to identify and prioritize the rehabilitation and replacement (R&R) plan. The remaining useful life of assets shall be assessed by the Consultant based on the projected useful life and recent condition assessment information. The Consultant shall conduct the condition assessment of gravity sewer pipelines based on (1) the review of the available CCTV inspection results and geodatabase of structural conditions (developed based on NASSCO ranking) provided by the City and (2) a risk-based assessment to determine an overall risk score for individual pipelines by factoring both likelihood of failure (LoF) and consequence of failure (CoF). The Consultant shall also assess the conditions of other system facilities based upon the accepted industry standards and recommend the needed improvements. These efforts may include, but not limited, to: • Evaluate conditions of force mains considering their material, age, size, and history of repairs. • Inspect conditions of all system manholes to determine condition, coordinate numbering, and prioritize the repair needs. • Inspect and document the conditions of the existing siphon structures. • Inspect and evaluate each lift station and each water reclamation facility. • Inspect and document conditions of the sewer system crossings with key infrastructure, such as freeways, railroad tracks, and storm drainage channels. • Identify and discuss the conditions of facilities requiring frequent maintenance. Utilities Department staff will assist with field visits to lift stations and/or water reclamation facility sites as required to determine asset conditions. Information obtained through the Corona Enterprise Asset Management System (NEXGEN) shall be utilized where available. The SMP Update effort is not a full condition assessment task like inspecting CCTV records for sewer systems, but rather another layer of data to help prioritize facilities not meeting the planning and design criteria.