Common use of Component Failures Clause in Contracts

Component Failures. In the event that a Non-Conforming Product is the result of a Component, Kin Yat will pass on to iRobot all available warranty remedies pursuant to Section 5.2. In addition, Kin Yat will negotiate with the Component suppliers (save for the suppliers of Consigned Component not controlled by Kin Yat), at iRobot’s discretion and with iRobot present or on iRobot’s behalf, for additional remedies outside of the Component warranty pursuant to Section 5.2. Kin Yat shall not enter into any settlement with respect to Component failures that affects iRobot’s rights or interests without iRobot’s prior written approval, which shall not be unreasonably withheld. In the event that such negotiations do not resolve the matter to iRobot’s reasonable satisfaction, and the available warranty remedies under Section 5.2 do not cover the full cost of Component repair or replacement, Kin Yat will provide iRobot with prior written notice regarding any additional costs required to repair or re-manufacture the affected Products. In the event that cost details are not readily available and iRobot requires immediate repair or replacement of the affected Products, iRobot may elect to authorize Kin Yat to proceed with repair or re-manufacture of the affected Products on a not to exceed basis. iRobot will be liable for any additional costs actually incurred by Kin Yat to repair or re-manufacture the affected Products, provided that iRobot has given Kin Yat written approval before such costs were incurred.

Appears in 4 contracts

Samples: Manufacturing Services Agreement (Irobot Corp), Manufacturing Services Agreement (Irobot Corp), Manufacturing Services Agreement (Irobot Corp)

AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.