Complications Sample Clauses
The "Complications" clause defines how unforeseen or unexpected issues that arise during the execution of an agreement, such as a medical procedure or a project, will be managed. Typically, this clause outlines the responsibilities of the parties if complications occur, including notification requirements, additional costs, or changes to the scope of work. Its core function is to allocate risk and clarify procedures in the event of complications, ensuring that all parties understand their obligations and reducing the potential for disputes.
Complications. The Patient understands that it is his/her responsibility to contact the Practice to report changes in their medical condition.
Complications. In the unfortunate event there are pregnancy related complications, the school nurse may work closely with the physician or nurse practitioner to assist the student. If the student should require bed rest or some type of specialized care, the expected duration of treatment must be documented by the healthcare provider. During this time, an individualized health and educational plan may be developed to meet the needs of the student. Homebound assigned instruction will be the last alternative to continuation of educational services. Other alternatives must be exhausted first. If homebound instruction is deemed necessary, the healthcare provider must complete a Certificate of Incapacity form and the request will be made to the Superintendent of Pike County School Corporation and approved by the school board. Delivery and Beyond: The school nurse should be notified of the delivery within 72 hours. A conference may be scheduled to plan for the student’s return to school. The student must have a written release from the healthcare provider in order to return to school. In the best interest of the student’s continuation of education, a consecutive fourteen-day period of absence will be permitted. If there are extenuating circumstances and the student has not been released from the healthcare provider, an alternative educational plan may be determined. This policy is meant to assist in meeting the educational and medical needs of the student. An efficient working relationship between the student, parents, school and healthcare provider is vital in ensuring a successful education.
Complications. Complication – a borehole state caused by geological conditions (disparity between projected data and actual bed depths, cavities, abnormal low and high formation pressure) that doesn’t allow to perform operations in compliance with the Project and this Contract provisions and require expenditures of time and materials additional to those stipulated in this Contract and Project. Contractor confirms its readiness to perform any jobs on Complications elimination and shall perform them as if they were planned in the Project. Despite of aforesaid the cost of Complication elimination operation is not included in contractual job cost and shall be paid by Customer additionally as indicated in Appendix B.
Complications. The ACOG guidelines on fetal macrosomia have identified the most common and most severe complications linked with macrosomia. Increased risk of cesarean delivery is the primary maternal risk, because of concern about both maternal and infant complications associated with disproportion between fetal size and pelvic size. ACOG identified shoulder dystocia in infants as the most serious complication, even though the condition is rare, and infant clavicle fracture and brachial plexus nerve damage as the most common fetal injuries associated with macrosomia.5 In 2012, ▇▇▇▇ et. al. found the risk of composite maternal and neonatal complications increased 2.29 times for infants weighing between 4,000-4,499 grams and 6.27 times for infants weighing between 4,500- 4,999 grams compared to infants with birth weights below 4,000 grams. This increased risk held true for both diabetic and non-diabetic pregnancies.32
Complications. All Services provided or ordered to treat complications of a non-covered Service are not covered unless stated otherwise in this document.
Complications. At the end of the 20th century, it turned out that HIV and hepatitis C virus can be transmitted through blood transfusions. Therefore, the complications of blood transfusion were examined more closely. Table 1 summarizes the transfusion-related complications. Discussion of these complications is beyond the scope of this article. Due to these transfusion-related complications – including infectious complications – the risk/benefit balance of red blood cell transfusion became an important and critical focus of attention. Acute hemolytic transfusion reaction Transfusion-transmitted bacterial infection Delayed hemolytic transfusion reaction Transfusion-transmitted viral infection (CMV, Parvo B19, hepatitis, HIV) Anaphylactic transfusion reaction Variant Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease Mild allergic transfusion reaction Others (e.g., parasitic infections) (Febrile) non-hemolytic transfusion reaction Transfusion-related acute lung injury (TRALI) Transfusion-associated circulatory overload (TACO) Post-transfusion purpura (PTP) Transfusion-associated graft-versus-host disease Secondary hemochromatosis Immunomodulation The “Transfusion Requirements In Critical Care” (TRICC) study, a landmark trial, randomized patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) to a ‘restrictive transfusion strategy’ (transfusion trigger of 7 g/dL) versus a ‘liberal transfusion strategy’ (transfusion trigger of 10 g/dL).4 The study demonstrated no difference in 30-day mortality rate between both groups. Several other transfusion trigger trials followed after the publication of the TRICC trial, studying similar transfusion triggers in different patient categories. Table 2 presents the meta-analyses of the randomized controlled trials comparing the clinical effects of different transfusion strategies. The majority of these meta-analyses found no difference in clinical outcomes (mortality, infections and myocardial infarction) between a restrictive and liberal transfusion strategy. Only one meta-analysis of trials in ICU patients and patients with gastrointestinal bleeding reported lower mortality in the restrictive transfusion strategy group compared to the liberal strategy group.5 20126 Heterogeneous‡ 11 (n= 4979) 7.0 – 9.0 9.0 – 10.0 0.85 0.81 (0.66-1.00) 0.72 (0.31-1.70) 0.88 (0.38-2.04) (0.70-1.03) 20145 Critically ill (including 3 (n= 2364) 7.0 9.0 – 10.0 0.81 0.86 (0.73-1.00) 0.48 (0.33-0.73) 0.44 (0.22-0.89) pediatric patients) and upper gastrointestinal bleeding (0.61-0.96) 20147 Tho...
