Complexity Comparison Clause Samples

Complexity Comparison. − Regardless of the master key loading scheme, our protocol requires at most 2(t 1) PRF evaluations. Assuming that an X- bit secure HMAC is used as the PRF in our protocol and that a hash-based pseudo-random number generator (e.g., [43]) is used in ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ and Desmedt’s protocol, the total complex- ity of the PRF evaluation and random number generation in the two protocols is comparable. The difference in computational complexity therefore lies elsewhere. . Σ By extending the standard linear time greedy set cover algo- rithm [40] to the hypergraph setting, it can be shown that the number of operations required by the MCSH approximation in Algorithm 1 grows as O (tn) (assuming O(n) total master keys). Since this algorithm is executed at all t clients in paral- solution suitable for implementation in power-constrained wireless networks. The key issue to address in that translation is protocol scalability. For example, a pseudo-random master key distribution that can be derived from a single seed could be used in place of the random distributions considered herein. This would enable low-overhead network join operations while maintaining energy-efficient group key agreement. Other is- sues to address include support for group join operations, robustness to lossy wireless links, and key refreshing.

Related to Complexity Comparison

  • Complexity Intermediate professional level role. Provides data warehouse architectural design, development and support in multi-platform environments. Works on multiple projects as a team member and may lead projects of moderate complexity. May coach more junior technical staff.

  • Revenue Metering The Connecting Transmission Owner’s revenue metering will be located on the generator side of the 115kV breaker at the ▇▇▇▇▇ Solar Collector Substation and will consist of: • three (3) combination current/voltage transformer (“CT/VT”) units (manufacturer and model ABB/▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ KXM-550, GE Grid Solutions KOTEF ▇▇▇.▇▇, or other equivalent specified by Connecting Transmission Owner); and • one (1) revenue meter. The ratios of the CTs and VTs will be provided by Connecting Transmission Owner upon its review of the Interconnection Customer’s design documents. (Note: Connecting Transmission Owner’s revenue metering CTs and VTs cannot be used to feed the Interconnection Customer’s check meter.) SERVICE AGREEMENT NO. 2556

  • Staffing There shall be a clinician employed by the outside contractor for EAP Services who will be on-site a minimum of 20 hours a week. The clinician shall report directly to the outside contractor, Peer Assistance Oversight Committee and the MIF liaison. There shall be three full-time Peer Assistants reporting to the outside contractor.

  • Geometric visibility The visibility of the illuminating surface, including its visibility in areas which do not appear to be illuminated in the direction of observation considered, shall be ensured within a divergent space defined by generating lines based on the perimeter of the illuminating surface and forming an angle of not less than 5° with the axis of reference of the headlamp.

  • Performance Expectations The Charter School’s performance in relation to the indicators, measures, metrics and targets set forth in the CPF shall provide the basis upon which the SCSC will decide whether to renew the Charter School’s Charter Contract at the end of the charter term. This section shall not preclude the SCSC from considering other relevant factors in making renewal decisions.