Comparability Study Sample Clauses

Comparability Study. Before negotiations over a successor collective agreement begin, the District, in coordination with CSEA, will do a wage comparability study to determine if any classification does not meet comparability with similar school districts as historically defined.
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (8)
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Comparability Study a. The Parties agree to participate in a District-wide comparability study. The purpose of the comparability study is to review District positions to ensure that the District’s total compensation package including salary and benefits is competitive as compared to similar public school districts.
Sample 1
Comparability Study. The parties agree that during the first year of this Agreement a joint labor/management committee will determine the parameters for a compensation and benefits comparison study which study shall be completed no later than October 1, 2000. APPENDIX A GRIEVANCE FORM 12/8/89 MESPA CP Manchester Education Support Personnel Association Grievance Form Name of Complainant Date of Filing Home Address No. of years as a Home Telephone school employee Position Held Name of Work Location and Address Immediate Supervisor Grievance Representative Meeting with Immediate Supervisor: Held on: Result: Provision(s) of Master Agreement Allegedly Violated: i Known: Statement of Grievance: (Explain what happened. The statement should include if when it occurred, who caused it, and where it happened. Also, explain your loss and injury.) Action Requested (Set forth the remedy sought.) Signature of the Complainant APPENDIX E Memorandum To: All Principals, Directors, and Coordinator From: Xxxxxxxxx X Xxxxxxxx, Assistant Superintendent for Elementary Date: January 12, 2004 Re: MESPA Achievement Step Plans and Revised Evaluation Process In my role as the district administrative liaison to MESPA, I would like to inform you of recent changes in the MESPA contract. The evaluation process has been revised and there is a new opportunity for MESPA members to complete a professional development plan to become eligible for a half step increase in salary. Please refer to the attached copies of the relevant explanation in the new MESPA contract. I have also included for your use blank copies of the Achievement Step Plan and the new evaluation form. MESPA employees will continue to be evaluated on their anniversary date of current position. Participation in the MESPA Achievement Step Plan for professional development is voluntary. For 2003-2004, Achievement Step plans are to be submitted to the personnel office by February 12th. In addition, for 2003-2004 activities completed between July 1 and February 12 may be included. cc: Xxxxxxxxx Xxxxx, Personnel Director Xxx Xxxxx, Executive Director MESPA Cabinet Correction to Appendix E (April 2008) Appendix E contains a memorandum, dated January 12, 2004, regarding MESPA Achievement Step Plans and Revised Evaluation Process. That memorandum, among other things, refers to opportunities for MESPA bargaining unit members to complete a professional development plan and thereby become eligible for a “half step increase in salary.” The word “step” was used...
Sample 1
Comparability Study. Not less than fourteen (14) months prior to the end of the existing contract, the District and CSEA will convene a committee to conduct a collaborative comparability study which will include a comparison of salaries and benefits for mutually selected benchmark positions across CSEA classification groups in four (4) comparable districts. This committee shall include four (4) CSEA representatives and up to four (4) District representatives. It is understood that this data may be the basis for negotiating internal alignment of positions within the unit.
Sample 1
Comparability Study. The Parties agree to participate in a comparability study.
Sample 1

Related to Comparability Study

  • Study An application for leave of absence for professional study must be supported by a written statement indicating what study or research is to be undertaken, or, if applicable, what subjects are to be studied and at what institutions.

  • Feasibility Study 4.3.1 The Feasibility Study shall identify any potential adverse system impacts that would result from the interconnection of the Generating Facility.

  • Mileage Measurement Where required, the mileage measurement for LIS rate elements is determined in the same manner as the mileage measurement for V&H methodology as outlined in NECA Tariff No. 4.

  • Measuring EPP parameters Every 5 minutes, EPP probes will select one “IP address” of the EPP servers of the TLD being monitored and make an “EPP test”; every time they should alternate between the 3 different types of commands and between the commands inside each category. If an “EPP test” result is undefined/unanswered, the EPP service will be considered as unavailable from that probe until it is time to make a new test.

  • Evaluation Criteria 5.2.1. The responses will be evaluated based on the following: (edit evaluation criteria below as appropriate for your project)

  • Evaluation Cycle Goal Setting and Development of the Educator Plan

  • Measuring DNS parameters Every minute, every DNS probe will make an UDP or TCP “DNS test” to each of the public-­‐DNS registered “IP addresses” of the name servers of the domain name being monitored. If a “DNS test” result is undefined/unanswered, the tested IP will be considered unavailable from that probe until it is time to make a new test.

  • Tests and Preclinical and Clinical Trials The preclinical studies and clinical trials conducted by or, to the Company’s knowledge, on behalf of the Company, that are described in the Registration Statement, the Pricing Disclosure Package and the Prospectus, as applicable, and are intended to be submitted to FDA or other comparable government entities, were and, if still ongoing, are being conducted in all material respects in accordance with experimental protocols, procedures and controls pursuant to accepted professional scientific standards and all Authorizations and Applicable Laws, including, without limitation, the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act and the rules and regulations promulgated thereunder and for studies submitted to regulatory authorities for approval, current Good Clinical Practices and Good Laboratory Practices and any applicable rules and regulations of the jurisdiction in which such trials and studies are being conducted; the descriptions of the results of such studies and trials contained in the Registration Statement, the Pricing Disclosure Package and the Prospectus are, to the Company’s knowledge, accurate and complete in all material respects and fairly present the data derived from such studies and trials; except to the extent disclosed in the Registration Statement, the Pricing Disclosure Package and the Prospectus, the Company is not aware of any studies or trials, the results of which the Company believes reasonably call into question the study or trial results described or referred to in the Registration Statement, the Pricing Disclosure Package and the Prospectus when viewed in the context in which such results are described and the clinical stage of development; and, except to the extent disclosed in the Registration Statement, the Pricing Disclosure Package or the Prospectus, the Company has not received any written notices or written correspondence from the FDA or any governmental entity requiring the termination or suspension of any preclinical studies or clinical trials conducted by or on behalf of the Company, other than ordinary course communications with respect to modifications in connection with the design and implementation of such trials, copies of which communications have been made available to you.

  • RE-WEIGHING PRODUCT Deliveries are subject to re- weighing at the point of destination by the Authorized User. If shrinkage occurs which exceeds that normally allowable in the trade, the Authorized User shall have the option to require delivery of the difference in quantity or to reduce the payment accordingly. Such option shall be exercised in writing by the Authorized User.

  • Test The outer surface of the lamp lenses shall be subjected once or more than once to the action of the sand jet produced as described above. The jet shall be sprayed almost perpendicular to the surface to be tested. The deterioration shall be checked by means of one or more samples of glass placed as a reference near the lenses to be tested. The mixture shall be sprayed until the variation in the diffusion of light on the sample or samples measured by the method described in Appendix 2, is such that: Δ d = (T5 - T4) / T2 ≤ 0.0250 ± 0.0025 Several reference samples may be used to check that the whole surface to be tested has deteriorated homogeneously. Annex 6 - Appendix 4

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.