Commitment to the Process Clause Samples
The 'Commitment to the Process' clause establishes an obligation for the parties to actively participate in and adhere to the procedures outlined in the agreement. This may include requirements such as attending scheduled meetings, providing necessary documentation, or cooperating with mediators or other third parties involved in the process. By setting clear expectations for engagement, this clause helps ensure that all parties remain dedicated to achieving the agreement's objectives and prevents delays or disruptions caused by lack of participation.
Commitment to the Process. The Association agrees that neither the Association nor an individual grievant will circumvent the grievance procedure by going directly to the Board of Education or to an individual Board member.
Commitment to the Process. Starting the Process
3.1 The Process begins when we sign this Contract.
3.2 We agree that this Contract constitutes an agreement to keep matters out of court and to put any existing court action on hold. For the sake of greater clarity, this means that for the purposes of the Alberta Rules of Court, this Contract is a stand- still agreement and brings any existing litigation to a stop until the Process ends, even if an Order is granted as part of the Process.
3.3 The Process ends:
(a) if one of us retains a lawyer who is not a Registered Collaborative Family Lawyer concerning our family law matters or starts a court process dealing with a matter that is the subject of this Process;
(b) whenever a Participant is no longer represented by a Registered Collaborative Family Lawyer; or
(c) when we sign an Agreement with our Lawyers, unless we agree to obtain a a divorce by consent and then when the divorce is granted.
3.4 A change in Registered Collaborative Family Lawyers is not an end to the Process; the Process may continue once the new Lawyer has executed this Contract.
3.5 If we agree to apply for Orders to confirm or give effect to our agreements or apply for a Divorce Judgment, then the Process ends upon the granting of the Order(s) or Divorce Judgment.
3.6 The Process may end upon the withdrawal of a Lawyer or other Team member:
(a) if either of us fails to comply with this Contract or otherwise acts contrary to the principles of the Process, including a failure to treat a Participant, Team member or other professional with dignity and respect;
(b) if one of us makes unilateral decisions regarding our property, finances or parenting;
(c) if agreements made during the Process are not honoured; or
(d) if one of us intentionally misrepresents relevant information or fails to disclose information that would be necessary to allow the other Participant to make a fully informed decision.
3.7 Either of us may choose to end the Process by giving written notice to the other Participant or to the other Participant’s Lawyer that the Process is ended. Neither of us may bring a Court application within 30 days of that notice, unless that Participant satisfies the Court that there is an emergency that must be dealt with before the 30-day period expires.
3.8 We agree that if the Process should end, both Lawyers must withdraw and we may not retain another lawyer in our Lawyer’s firm or office to represent us in any non- Collaborative or court process.
3.9 We will each pa...
Commitment to the Process. The Union agrees that neither the Union nor an individual grievant will circumvent the grievance procedure by going directly to the Board of Education or to an individual Board member.
Commitment to the Process. The arbitrators shall abide by the terms of the Chapter, the rules set out in this Code of Conduct and the rules of procedure. The arbitrators shall be independent and impartial, shall avoid direct or indirect conflicts of interest and shall respect the confidentiality of the proceedings established in the Chapter, so as to preserve the integrity and impartiality of the dispute settlement mechanism.
Commitment to the Process. 1. The arbitrators and Panelists shall abide by the terms of the Agreement.
2. The arbitrators and Panelists shall be independent and impartial, shall avoid direct or indirect conflict of interest and shall respect the confidentiality of the proceedings as provided in the Protocol on Rules and Procedures on the Settlement of Disputes so as to preserve the integrity and impartiality of the dispute settlement mechanism.
Commitment to the Process. Although the terminology used varies somewhat in the literature, case studies show that the level of stakeholder commitment to collaboration is an important variable in explaining success or failure (▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, and ▇▇▇▇▇▇ 1998; ▇▇▇▇▇▇ and Day 2003; ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ 2001; ▇▇▇▇, ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, and ▇. '▇▇▇▇ 2003). In a survey of the American and Australian Collaboration Groups, ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ (2002) found that “commitment” was an important factor in facilitating collaboration. Weak commitment of public institutions to collaborate, especially at the head office level, is often seen as a problem (▇▇▇▇▇▇ and ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ 2003). Commitment is closely related to motivation to participate in collaborative governance (▇▇▇▇▇ and ▇▇▇▇, 2007). Commitment also poses a complicated dilemma. Commitment to a collaborative process requires an initial willingness to comply with the results of the deliberations, even if they are not fully supported by stakeholders (▇▇▇▇▇ and ▇▇▇▇, 2007). Based on the results of interviews and observations of the authors, it is known that the commitment to this collaboration process is still low. This is reinforced by the authors' findings when conducting research, namely the BPJS Health system in hospital services has also used applications related to data collection of referral patients and input of service results data through supporting applications for INA CBGs. This system is managed by the hospital itself, because there are no BPJS Health officers stationed at the hospital. The problem is that during the application update process or application version change, it takes time to adjust so that data is not lost. In addition, the use of application support for the service system for JKN participants provided by BPJS Kesehatan Kupang Branch is also constrained by the availability of experts who can operate it properly in the area. Hospitals, in fact, are still found to have irregular habits in service documentation so that service data input and the claim submission process are sometimes late. There are also complaints about BPJS Health services, namely information about the rules for accessing services. Some patients participating in JKN through BPJS Health do not understand well about the types of services and drugs covered by BPJS Health, including the terms or conditions of payment when upgrading to a treatment class. This can happen because the BPJS does not place its officers in the hospital, so there are often misunderstandings between patients a...