CGIAR Structure Sample Clauses

CGIAR Structure. 3.1 The CGIAR is characterized by two reinforcing pillars: (i) on the CGIAR Funders side coordinated through the CGIAR Fund, and (ii) on the CGIAR Doers side coordinated through the Consortium. The organizational structure of the CGIAR Fund consists of the following: Fund Council, Fund Office, Trustee, and Funders Forum. 3.2 On the CGIAR Doers side, the CGIAR Fund structure is complemented by the following entities responsible for management and implementation of SRF research: Consortium, governed by a Board of Directors, and Centers. 3.3 The dual structure rests on the respective collective undertakings and responsibilities of the Fund Council and the Consortium, particularly with respect to the use, allocation and oversight of funds from the CGIAR Fund, and is expected to be joined through various bridging mechanisms, including: SRF, ISPC, Common Operational Framework, M&E Framework, IEA, GCARD, CGIAR Principles, Contractual arrangements between the Consortium and the Fund Council (as applicable, through their respective representative legal entities) and/or Trustee for the receipt and use of funds from the CGIAR Fund to operationalize the SRF, and Common dispute resolution mechanism for the CGIAR.
View SourceView Similar (20)
CGIAR Structure. 3.1 The CGIAR is characterized by two reinforcing pillars: (i) on the CGIAR Funders side coordinated through the CGIAR Fund, and (ii) on the CGIAR Doers side coordinated through the Consortium. The organizational structure of the CGIAR Fund consists of the following: (i) Fund Council, (ii) Fund Office, (iii) Trustee, and (iv) Funders Forum. 3.2 On the CGIAR Doers side, the CGIAR Fund structure is complemented by the following entities responsible for management and implementation of SRF research: (i) Consortium, governed by a Board of Directors, and (ii) Centers. 3.3 The dual structure rests on the respective collective undertakings and responsibilities of the Fund Council and the Consortium, particularly with respect to the use, allocation and oversight of funds from the CGIAR Fund, and is expected to be joined through various bridging mechanisms, including: (i) SRF, (ii) ISPC, (iii) Common Operational Framework, (iv) M&E Framework, (v) IEA,
View SourceView Similar (19)

Related to CGIAR Structure

  • Management Structure Describe the overall management approach toward planning and implementing the contract. Include an organization chart for the management of the contract, if awarded.

  • Master Feeder Structure If permitted by the 1940 Act, the Board of Trustees, by vote of a majority of the Trustees, and without a Shareholder vote, may cause the Trust or any one or more Series to convert to a master feeder structure (a structure in which a feeder fund invests all of its assets in a master fund, rather than making investments in securities directly) and thereby cause existing Series of the Trust to either become feeders in a master fund, or to become master funds in which other funds are feeders.

  • Framework Management Structure The Supplier shall provide a suitably qualified nominated contact (the “Supplier Framework Manager”) who will take overall responsibility for delivering the Goods and/or Services required within this Framework Agreement, as well as a suitably qualified deputy to act in their absence. The Supplier shall put in place a structure to manage the Framework in accordance with Framework Schedule 2 (Goods and/or Services and Key Performance Indicators). A full governance structure for the Framework will be agreed between the Parties during the Framework Agreement implementation stage. Following discussions between the Parties following the Framework Commencement Date, the Authority shall produce and issue to the Supplier a draft Supplier Action Plan. The Supplier shall not unreasonably withhold its agreement to the draft Supplier Action Plan. The Supplier Action Plan shall, unless the Authority otherwise Approves, be agreed between the Parties and come into effect within two weeks from receipt by the Supplier of the draft Supplier Action Plan. The Supplier Action Plan shall be maintained and updated on an ongoing basis by the Authority. Any changes to the Supplier Action Plan shall be notified by the Authority to the Supplier. The Supplier shall not unreasonably withhold its agreement to any changes to the Supplier Action Plan. Any such changes shall, unless the Authority otherwise Approves, be agreed between the Parties and come into effect within two weeks from receipt by the Supplier of the Authority’s notification. Regular performance review meetings will take place at the Authority’s premises throughout the Framework Period and thereafter until the Framework Expiry Date (“Supplier Review Meetings”). The exact timings and frequencies of such Supplier Review Meetings will be determined by the Authority following the conclusion of the Framework Agreement. It is anticipated that the frequency of the Supplier Review Meetings will be once every month or less. The Parties shall be flexible about the timings of these meetings. The purpose of the Supplier Review Meetings will be to review the Supplier’s performance under this Framework Agreement and, where applicable, the Supplier’s adherence to the Supplier Action Plan. The agenda for each Supplier Review Meeting shall be set by the Authority and communicated to the Supplier in advance of that meeting. The Supplier Review Meetings shall be attended, as a minimum, by the Authority Representative(s) and the Supplier Framework Manager.

  • Group Structure 17.1 The Company does not have any Subsidiary nor has it at any time a member of or the beneficial owner of any shares, securities or other interest in any company or other person.

  • Agreement Structure This Agreement includes Part 1 - General Terms, Part 2 - Country-unique Terms (if any), the LI, and the ▇▇▇ and is the complete agreement between Licensee and Lenovo regarding the use of the Program. It replaces any prior oral or written communications between Licensee and Lenovo concerning Licensee’s use of the Program. The terms of Part 2 may replace or modify those of Part 1. To the extent of any conflict, the LI prevails over both Parts.