Capability Assessment Sample Clauses

Capability Assessment. Where DHS has conducted a Capability Assessment for a Participant (Mutual Obligation), the Provider must: review the outcome of the Capability Assessment and consider actioning any recommendations arising from the outcome; and if the Capability Assessment found that the Participant is not capable of meeting the Mutual Obligation Requirements in their Job Plan, ensure that a Delegate updates the Participant’s Job Plan within the timeframe and as specified in the findings of the Capability Assessment and any Guidelines.
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (6)
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Capability Assessment the process by which you contact all the Contractors qualified in a Lot to determine which are interested in bidding for your requirement. Catalogue – refers to the information provided by Contractors on the Government Procurement Service website including product details, pricing and the Contractor’s profile. Confidential Information – the information deemed confidential by you or the Contractor. Contract – the binding agreement between you and the Contractor for the provision of IT goods based on the Terms and Conditions of the Model Contract.
Sample 1Sample 2
Capability Assessment. Where Services Australia has conducted a Capability Assessment for a Participant (Mutual Obligation), the Provider must: review the outcome of the Capability Assessment and consider actioning any recommendations arising from the outcome; and if the Capability Assessment found that the Participant is not capable of meeting the Mutual Obligation Requirements in their Job Plan, ensure that a Delegate updates the Participant’s Job Plan within the timeframe and as specified in the findings of the Capability Assessment and any Guidelines.
Sample 1Sample 2
Capability Assessment. (a) Teachers who satisfy the eligibility requirements in clause 50.2 shall be subject to a Capability Assessment based on the following criteria:
Sample 1
Capability Assessment. A Capability Assessment is not required by DMA 2000 and its implementing regulations. However, a Capability Assessment is recommended by Cal EMA/FEMA. As such URS will work with participating jurisdictions to complete tables which capture information regarding the following for each jurisdiction: ▪ Human and Technical Resources for Hazard Mitigation ▪ Financial Resources for Hazard Mitigation ▪ Legal and Regulatory Resources for Hazard Mitigation ▪ Current, Ongoing, and Completed Hazard Mitigation Projects and Programs
Sample 1
Capability Assessment. As part of the Plan update and as required by Cal OES, Wood will evaluate the County’s and participating jurisdictions’ existing capabilities to mitigate risk and vulnerabilities from natural, technological, and manmade hazards. The Capability Assessment will identify existing legal and regulatory tools addressing each hazard; discuss any applicable past, present, and future hazard mitigation programs; and assess the administrative, technical, and financial capabilities of first responders. The customized data collection guide discussed under Task 2 will be used to gather updated capability information from participating jurisdictions and agencies. By collecting information about existing programs, policies, regulations and emergency plans, Wood can assess those activities and measures already in place that contribute towards mitigating some of the vulnerabilities identified. Once updated, the Capability Assessment is compared to the Risk Assessment to “paint a picture” of the potential disaster impacts. The information obtained during this process details the “net vulnerability” of the area (i.e., vulnerability tempered by existing capabilities), and it provides a platform for developing mitigation goals. In addition, this information provides a baseline of what these likely impacts would cost, thus providing an estimate of the benefits of any resulting mitigation actions. This provides added value to the LHMP by ensuring integration of the plan with existing policies, procedures, and other plans and assists in the identification of additional mitigation strategies. Task 3 Deliverables • Prepare and distribute Data Collection Guide to HMPC • Draft Capability Assessment Task 4 Hazard Profile and Risk Assessment The first sub-task of the Risk Assessment and Natural Hazards Assessment is the Hazard Identification, which involves identifying and profiling hazard events that present a threat to both the incorporated and unincorporated parts of the County. The planning effort will identify natural hazards and prioritize them by significance. As part of the plan development process, the HMPC will then review the list of hazards during HMPC Meeting #2. Hazards evaluated will include, but not be limited to: • Adverse weather – including drought and extreme weather events • Agricultural pests and plant diseases • Biological agents • Coastal erosion • Coastal flooding and inundation • Earthquakes – including fault rupture and groundshaking • Flooding • Debris Flows ...
Sample 1
Capability Assessment. In requesting the delegation, the Territorial Authority has provided NZTA with the capability assessment attached as Schedule V. Should any material factor (noted as such in the schedule) in the capability assessment change, the Territorial Authority shall notify NZTA in writing of the change within 7 days of such change together with any proposed action to alleviate any reduction in the Territorial Authority's capability arising from the change.
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Capability Assessment. This assessment will be conducted to inventory those existing plans, policies, and procedures that the City has in place to temper the effect of hazards. This will include protective measures under the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP), building codes, zoning ordinances, completed or ongoing mitigation projects, and mitigation polices established in the general or comprehensive plans of participating jurisdictions. Technological and infrastructure vulnerabilities will also be noted in detail. Photographs of the vulnerabilities in Costa Mesa will be incorporated as appropriate or requested.
Sample 1

Related to Capability Assessment

  • Security Assessment If Accenture reasonably determines, or in good faith believes, that Supplier’s security practices or procedures do not meet Supplier’s obligations under the Agreement, then Accenture will notify Supplier of the deficiencies. Supplier will without unreasonable delay: (i) correct such deficiencies at its own expense; (ii) permit Accenture, or its duly authorized representatives, to assess Supplier’s security-related activities that are relevant to the Agreement; and (iii) timely complete a security questionnaire from Accenture on a periodic basis upon Accenture’s request. Security issues identified by Accenture will be assigned risk ratings and an agreed-to timeframe to remediate. Supplier will remediate all the security issues identified within the agreed to timeframes. Upon Supplier’s failure to remediate any high or medium rated security issues within the stated timeframes, Accenture may terminate the Agreement in accordance with Section 8 above.

  • Risk Assessment An assessment of any risks inherent in the work requirements and actions to mitigate these risks.

  • Diagnostic Assessment 6.3.1 Boards shall provide a list of pre-approved assessment tools consistent with their Board improvement plan for student achievement and which is compliant with Ministry of Education PPM (PPM 155: Diagnostic Assessment in Support of Student Learning, date of issue January 7, 2013).

  • Study An application for leave of absence for professional study must be supported by a written statement indicating what study or research is to be undertaken, or, if applicable, what subjects are to be studied and at what institutions.

  • Joint Assessment If the Premises are not separately assessed, Lessee's liability shall be an equitable proportion of the Real Property Taxes for all of the land and improvements included within the tax parcel assessed, such proportion to be conclusively determined by Lessor from the respective valuations assigned in the assessor's work sheets or such other information as may be reasonably available.

  • Conformity Assessment Procedures 1. The Parties recognise that a broad range of mechanisms exist to facilitate the acceptance of conformity assessment results, including:

  • Research Analyst Independence The Company acknowledges that the Underwriters’ research analysts and research departments are required to be independent from their respective investment banking divisions and are subject to certain regulations and internal policies, and that such Underwriters’ research analysts may hold views and make statements or investment recommendations and/or publish research reports with respect to the Company and/or the offering that differ from the views of their respective investment banking divisions. The Company hereby waives and releases, to the fullest extent permitted by law, any claims that the Company may have against the Underwriters with respect to any conflict of interest that may arise from the fact that the views expressed by their independent research analysts and research departments may be different from or inconsistent with the views or advice communicated to the Company by such Underwriters’ investment banking divisions. The Company acknowledges that each of the Underwriters is a full service securities firm and as such from time to time, subject to applicable securities laws, may effect transactions for its own account or the account of its customers and hold long or short positions in debt or equity securities of the companies that may be the subject of the transactions contemplated by this Agreement.

  • Needs Assessment The determination of whether the Annual Income of a family or individual occupying or seeking to occupy a Qualifying Unit complies with the requirements for Extremely Low-Income Households or Low- to Moderate-Income Households shall be made by the applicable housing authority in the CDBG-DR Program area prior to admission of such family or individual to occupancy of a Qualifying Unit.

  • Laboratory Testing All laboratories selected by UPS Freight for analyzing Controlled Substances Testing will be HHS certified.

  • Evaluation Cycle: Formative Assessment A) A specific purpose for evaluation is to promote student learning, growth and achievement by providing Educators with feedback for improvement. Evaluators are expected to make frequent unannounced visits to classrooms. Evaluators are expected to give targeted constructive feedback to Educators based on their observations of practice, examination of artifacts, and analysis of multiple measures of student learning, growth and achievement in relation to the Standards and Indicators of Effective Teaching Practice.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.