Capability Assessment Sample Clauses
POPULAR SAMPLE Copied 2 times
Capability Assessment. Where Services Australia has conducted a Capability Assessment for a Participant (Mutual Obligation), the Provider must: review the outcome of the Capability Assessment and consider actioning any recommendations arising from the outcome; and if the Capability Assessment found that the Participant is not capable of meeting the Mutual Obligation Requirements in their Job Plan, ensure that a Delegate updates the Participant’s Job Plan within the timeframe and as specified in the findings of the Capability Assessment and any Guidelines.
Capability Assessment. Where DHS has conducted a Capability Assessment for a Participant (Mutual Obligation), the Provider must: review the outcome of the Capability Assessment and consider actioning any recommendations arising from the outcome; and if the Capability Assessment found that the Participant is not capable of meeting the Mutual Obligation Requirements in their Job Plan, ensure that a Delegate updates the Participant’s Job Plan within the timeframe and as specified in the findings of the Capability Assessment and any Guidelines.
Capability Assessment the process by which you contact all the Contractors qualified in a Lot to determine which are interested in bidding for your requirement. Catalogue – refers to the information provided by Contractors on the Government Procurement Service website including product details, pricing and the Contractor’s profile. Confidential Information – the information deemed confidential by you or the Contractor. Contract – the binding agreement between you and the Contractor for the provision of IT goods based on the Terms and Conditions of the Model Contract.
Capability Assessment. (a) Teachers who satisfy the eligibility requirements in clause 50.2 shall be subject to a Capability Assessment based on the following criteria:
(b) The teacher demonstrates a clear understanding of, and contribution and commitment to the Quality Improvement Plan of the service.
(c) The teacher must demonstrate a well-developed level of understanding of and developing capabilities relevant to the roles and responsibilities and professional standards of a Level 3 teacher in the following areas:
(i) Pedagogical excellence and expert teaching skills;
(ii) Comprehensive knowledge and practice in developing innovative programs and curriculum;
(iii) An ability to respond to emerging trends and issues within early childhood education, their service and community;
(iv) Provision of leadership and role modelling to other early childhood staff within the service;
(v) Provision of expert advice and support to parents and the broader community in the development and delivery of early childhood education; and
(vi) Actively pursues opportunities to advocate on behalf of children and the development and delivery of early childhood education by working collaboratively and effectively with appropriate groups in the broader community.
(vii) Plays a significant role in leading and supporting programs determined by state and federal authorities.
Capability Assessment. In requesting the delegation, the Territorial Authority has provided NZTA with the capability assessment attached as Schedule V. Should any material factor (noted as such in the schedule) in the capability assessment change, the Territorial Authority shall notify NZTA in writing of the change within 7 days of such change together with any proposed action to alleviate any reduction in the Territorial Authority's capability arising from the change.
Capability Assessment. This assessment will be conducted to inventory those existing plans, policies, and procedures that the City has in place to temper the effect of hazards. This will include protective measures under the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP), building codes, zoning ordinances, completed or ongoing mitigation projects, and mitigation polices established in the general or comprehensive plans of participating jurisdictions. Technological and infrastructure vulnerabilities will also be noted in detail. Photographs of the vulnerabilities in Costa Mesa will be incorporated as appropriate or requested.
Capability Assessment. Trials for each Ship shall be carried out in accordance with Schedule 2 (Project Management Specification).
Capability Assessment. A Capability Assessment is not required by DMA 2000 and its implementing regulations. However, a Capability Assessment is recommended by Cal EMA/FEMA. As such URS will work with participating jurisdictions to complete tables which capture information regarding the following for each jurisdiction: ▪ Human and Technical Resources for Hazard Mitigation ▪ Financial Resources for Hazard Mitigation ▪ Legal and Regulatory Resources for Hazard Mitigation ▪ Current, Ongoing, and Completed Hazard Mitigation Projects and Programs
Capability Assessment. As part of the Plan update and as required by Cal OES, Wood will evaluate the County’s and participating jurisdictions’ existing capabilities to mitigate risk and vulnerabilities from natural, technological, and manmade hazards. The Capability Assessment will identify existing legal and regulatory tools addressing each hazard; discuss any applicable past, present, and future hazard mitigation programs; and assess the administrative, technical, and financial capabilities of first responders. The customized data collection guide discussed under Task 2 will be used to gather updated capability information from participating jurisdictions and agencies. By collecting information about existing programs, policies, regulations and emergency plans, Wood can assess those activities and measures already in place that contribute towards mitigating some of the vulnerabilities identified. Once updated, the Capability Assessment is compared to the Risk Assessment to “paint a picture” of the potential disaster impacts. The information obtained during this process details the “net vulnerability” of the area (i.e., vulnerability tempered by existing capabilities), and it provides a platform for developing mitigation goals. In addition, this information provides a baseline of what these likely impacts would cost, thus providing an estimate of the benefits of any resulting mitigation actions. This provides added value to the LHMP by ensuring integration of the plan with existing policies, procedures, and other plans and assists in the identification of additional mitigation strategies. • Prepare and distribute Data Collection Guide to HMPC • Draft Capability Assessment The first sub-task of the Risk Assessment and Natural Hazards Assessment is the Hazard Identification, which involves identifying and profiling hazard events that present a threat to both the incorporated and unincorporated parts of the County. The planning effort will identify natural hazards and prioritize them by significance. As part of the plan development process, the HMPC will then review the list of hazards during HMPC Meeting #2. Hazards evaluated will include, but not be limited to: • Adverse weather – including drought and extreme weather events • Agricultural pests and plant diseases • Biological agents • Coastal erosion • Coastal flooding and inundation • Earthquakes – including fault rupture and groundshaking • Flooding • Debris Flows • Hazardous Trees • Liquefaction • Radon Hazards • Sea Level R...
