Common use of CAEP Accreditation Cycle Clause in Contracts

CAEP Accreditation Cycle. The Parties understand and agree that: 4.1. The CAEP accreditation cycle involves an EPP in continuous improvement and requires an EPP to demonstrate that it meets CAEP’s high standards of quality required to improve P-12 student learning. 4.2. To merit full accreditation by CAEP, an EPP must meet all CAEP Standards on the basis of sufficient and accurate evidence. 4.3. A Site Review, carried out by an Evaluation Team, is an essential part of the accreditation process. Members of the assigned team investigate the quality of an EPP’s evidence, including the accuracy and consistency of the evidence provided in relation to CAEP Standards. In accordance with CAEP policy, CAEP may utilize a virtual site review or may have one or more Evaluation Team members participating using electronic means. 4.4. The State elects that CAEP’s reviews of ▇▇▇▇ in the State will be carried out using Evaluation Teams composed as follows:

CAEP Accreditation Cycle. The Parties understand and agree that: 4.1. The CAEP accreditation cycle involves an EPP in continuous improvement and requires an EPP to demonstrate that it meets CAEP’s high standards of quality required to improve P-12 student learning. 4.2. To merit full accreditation by CAEP, an EPP must meet all CAEP Standards on the basis of sufficient and accurate evidence. 4.3. A Site Reviewreview, carried out by an Evaluation TeamTeam (which may also be referred to as a review team or site review team), is an essential part of the accreditation process. Members of the assigned team investigate the quality of an EPP’s evidence, including the accuracy and consistency of the evidence provided in relation to CAEP Standards. In accordance with CAEP policy, CAEP may utilize a virtual site review or may have one or more Evaluation Team members participating using electronic means. 4.4. The State elects that CAEP’s reviews of ▇▇▇▇ in the State will be carried out using Evaluation Teams composed as follows:

CAEP Accreditation Cycle. The Parties understand and agree that: 4.1. : The CAEP accreditation cycle involves an EPP in continuous improvement and requires an EPP to demonstrate that it meets CAEP’s high standards of quality required to improve P-12 student learning. 4.2. To merit full accreditation by CAEP, an EPP must meet all CAEP Standards on the basis of sufficient and accurate evidence. 4.3. A Site Review, carried out by an Evaluation Team, is an essential part of the accreditation process. Members of the assigned team investigate the quality of an EPP’s evidence, including the accuracy and consistency of the evidence provided in relation to CAEP Standards. In accordance with CAEP policy, CAEP may utilize a virtual site review or may have one or more Evaluation Team members participating using electronic means. 4.4. The State elects that CAEP’s reviews of ▇▇▇▇ in the State will be carried out using Evaluation Teams composed as follows:

CAEP Accreditation Cycle. The Parties understand and agree that: 4.15.1. The CAEP accreditation Accreditation cycle involves an EPP in continuous improvement and requires an EPP to demonstrate that it meets CAEP’s high standards of quality required to improve P-12 student learning. 5.2. Subject to the provisions of Section 4.2. To , above, to merit full accreditation by CAEP, an EPP must meet all CAEP Standards on the basis of sufficient and accurate evidence. 4.35.3. A Site Reviewsite review, carried out by an Evaluation Teama review team, is an essential part of the accreditation process. Members of the assigned team investigate the quality of an EPP’s evidence, including the accuracy and consistency of the evidence provided in relation to CAEP Standards. In accordance with CAEP policyAccreditation Policy, CAEP may utilize a virtual site review or may have one or more Evaluation Team review team members participating using electronic means. 4.45.4. The State SBE elects that CAEP’s reviews of ▇▇▇▇ in the State will be carried out using Evaluation Teams review teams composed as follows:

CAEP Accreditation Cycle. The Parties understand and agree that: 4.1. The CAEP accreditation cycle involves an EPP in continuous improvement and requires an EPP to demonstrate that it meets CAEP’s high standards of quality required to improve P-12 student learning. 4.2. To merit full accreditation by CAEP, an EPP must meet all CAEP Standards on the basis of sufficient and accurate evidence. 4.3. A Site Review, carried out by an Evaluation Team, is an essential part of the accreditation process. Members of the assigned team investigate the quality of an EPP’s evidence, including the accuracy and consistency of the evidence provided in relation to CAEP Standards. In accordance with CAEP policy, CAEP may utilize a virtual site review or may have one or more Evaluation Team members participating using electronic means. 4.4. The State SCDE elects that CAEP’s reviews of ▇▇▇▇ in the State will be carried out using Evaluation Teams composed as follows:

CAEP Accreditation Cycle. The Parties understand and agree that: 4.1. The CAEP accreditation cycle involves an EPP in continuous improvement and requires an EPP to demonstrate that it meets CAEP’s high standards of quality required to improve P-12 P- 12 student learning. 4.2. To merit full accreditation by CAEP, an EPP must meet all CAEP Standards on the basis of sufficient and accurate evidence. 4.3. A Site Review, carried out by an Evaluation Team, is an essential part of the accreditation process. Members of the assigned team investigate the quality of an EPP’s evidence, including the accuracy and consistency of the evidence provided in relation to CAEP Standards. In accordance with CAEP policy, CAEP may utilize a virtual site review or may have one or more Evaluation Team members participating using electronic means. 4.4. The State CTC elects that CAEP’s reviews of ▇▇▇▇ in the State will be carried out using Evaluation Teams composed as follows:

CAEP Accreditation Cycle. The Parties understand and agree that: 4.1. The CAEP accreditation cycle involves an EPP in continuous improvement and requires an EPP to demonstrate that it meets CAEP’s high standards of quality required to improve P-12 student learning. 4.2. To merit full accreditation by CAEP, an EPP must meet all CAEP Standards on the basis of sufficient and accurate evidence. 4.3. A Site Review, carried out by an Evaluation Team, is an essential part of the accreditation process. Members of the assigned team investigate the quality of an EPP’s evidence, including the accuracy and consistency of the evidence provided in relation to CAEP Standards. In accordance with CAEP policy, CAEP may utilize a virtual site review or may have one or more Evaluation Team members participating using electronic means. 4.4. The State OSSE elects that CAEP’s reviews of ▇▇▇▇ in the State District of Columbia will be carried out using Evaluation Teams composed as follows:

CAEP Accreditation Cycle. The Parties understand and agree that: 4.1. The CAEP accreditation Accreditation cycle involves an EPP in continuous improvement and requires an EPP to demonstrate that it meets CAEP’s 's high standards of quality required needed to improve P-12 student learning. 4.2. To merit full accreditation by CAEP, an EPP must meet all CAEP Standards based on the basis of sufficient and accurate evidence. 4.3. A Site Review, Review carried out by an Evaluation Team, Team is an essential part of the accreditation process. Members of the The assigned team members investigate the quality of an EPP’s 's evidence, including the accuracy and consistency of the evidence provided in relation related to CAEP Standards. In accordance with CAEP policyCAEP's Accreditation Policy, CAEP may utilize a virtual site review or may have one or more Evaluation Team review team members participating using electronic means. 4.4. The State DDOE elects that CAEP’s CAEP reviews of ▇▇▇▇ in the State Delaware will be carried out using Evaluation Teams review teams composed as follows: