Blockchain. Solutions for a responsible use of the blockchain in the context of personal data. ▇▇▇▇▇://▇▇▇.▇▇▇▇.▇▇/sites/default/files/atoms/files/blockchain_en.pdf ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, ▇. (2014). Research design: qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). SAGE. Data Privacy Vocabulary -DPV (2021). Data Privacy Vocabulary (DPV) (Version 0.2). Draft Community Group Report, 13 January 2021. ▇▇▇▇▇://▇▇▇▇▇.▇▇▇▇▇▇.▇▇/dpv-gdpr/ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, ▇., & ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, P. (2017). An experimental investigation of knowledge acquisition techniques. Journal of Management Development, 36(4), 493– 514. ▇▇▇▇▇://▇▇▇.▇▇▇/10.1108/JMD-07-2016-0132 ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, ▇., & ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇-▇▇▇▇▇▇, V. (2021 forthcoming). Analysis of Ontologies and Policy Languages to Represent Information Flows in GDPR, submitted to Semantic Web Journal (2703-3917). ▇▇▇▇://▇▇▇.▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇-▇▇▇- ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇.▇▇▇/▇▇▇▇▇▇/▇▇▇▇▇/▇▇▇▇▇▇▇.▇▇▇. European Union Blockchain Observatory & Forum. (2020). Report on EU Blockchain Ecosystems Developments, 20 November 2020. ▇▇▇▇▇://▇▇▇.▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇.▇▇/sites/default/files/reports/EU%20Block chain%20Ecosystem%20Report_final_0.pdf ▇▇▇▇▇, B., ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, ▇.▇., ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, N., ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, ▇.▇. & ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, R.(2019. BPDIMS: A blockchain-based personal data and identity management system. In Proceedings of the 52nd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. ▇▇▇▇, ▇.(2019)Blockchain and the General Data Protection Regulation. Can distributed ledgers be squared with European data protection law? EPRS, European Parliamentary Research Service. Scientific Foresight Unit (STOA), PE 634.445 – July (2019). ▇▇▇▇▇://▇▇▇.▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇.▇▇▇▇▇▇.▇▇/RegData/etudes/STUD/2019/634445/EPRS_STU (2019)634445_EN.pdf ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, ▇. & ▇▇▇▇▇, J.(2019). A unified framework of five principles for AI in society. Harvard Data Science Review. 1(1). ▇▇▇▇▇://▇▇▇.▇▇▇/10.1162/99608f92.8cd550d1 Governatori, G., Idelberger, F., ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, Z., ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, R., ▇▇▇▇▇▇, G. & ▇▇, X. (2018). On legal contracts, imperative and declarative smart contracts, and blockchain systems. Artificial Intelligence and Law, 26(4),377-409. Governatori, G., ▇▇▇▇▇▇, ▇., ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, ▇. ▇▇▇▇▇▇, M., ▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇, ▇.,▇▇▇▇▇▇, M., & ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, P. (2020). `Rules as Code’ will let computers apply laws and regulations.But over-rigid interpretations would undermine our freedoms. The Conversation, 26 November 2020, ▇▇▇▇▇://▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇.▇▇▇/rules-as-code-will-let-computers-apply- laws-and-regulations-but-over-rigid-interpretations-would-undermine- our-freedoms-149992 ▇▇▇▇▇▇, ▇., ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, ▇., & ▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇, ▇.(2018). TERECOM2018@ JURIX, Technologies for Regulatory Compliance “Legal Compliance Through Design: Preliminary Results of a Literature Survey”. TERECOM2018@ JURIX, Technologies for Regulatory Compliance. ▇▇▇▇://▇▇▇▇-▇▇.▇▇▇/Vol- 2309/06.pdf ▇▇▇▇▇▇, ▇., Governatori, G., ▇▇▇, H.P. & ▇▇▇▇, ▇.▇.(2018). Are we done with business process compliance: state of the art and challenges ahead. Knowledge and Information Systems,57(1),79-133. ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, ▇., ▇▇▇▇▇▇, ▇., ▇▇▇ ▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇, ▇., ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, ▇., ▇▇ ▇▇▇▇,▇., ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, ▇., & ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, R. (2020). Populating legal ontologies using semantic role labeling. Artificial Intelligence and Law, 1-41. ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, ▇., ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, ▇., & ▇’▇▇▇▇▇, M. (2018). Privacy, security and policies: A review of problems and solutions with semantic web technologies. Semantic Web, 9(2), 153–161. ▇▇▇▇, ▇., & ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, ▇. ▇. (2012). Privacy analysis using ontologies. In ▇. ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, & ▇. ▇. ▇▇▇▇▇▇ (Eds.), 2nd. ACM Conference on Data and Application Security and Privacy, CODASPY 2012 (pp. 205-216). ACM. ▇▇▇▇, ▇., ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, ▇. ▇., ▇▇▇▇▇, ▇., & ▇▇▇▇, A. (2011). Privacy verification using ontologies. In Sixth International Conference on Availability, Reliability and Security, ARES 2011 (pp. 627-632). IEEE Computer Society ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇-▇▇▇▇▇▇▇,▇.,▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇-▇▇▇▇▇▇, V., ▇▇▇▇▇▇-▇▇▇▇▇▇, P., & ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇,I. (2018). Lynx and the Legal Knowledge Graph: Integrating lexical and terminological resources with legal data. Kernerman Dict. News, 261565– 47 (26), 2–5. ▇▇▇▇▇▇, ▇. (2011). Social research methods: qualitative and quantitative approaches (7th ed.). Allyn & Bacon. ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, M., & Governatori, G. (2018). Modelling legal knowledge for GDPR compliance checking. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications, 313, 101–110. ▇▇▇▇▇://▇▇▇.▇▇▇/10.3233/978-1-61499-935-5- 101 ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, M., Martoni, ▇., ▇▇▇▇▇, ▇., Bartolini, ▇., & ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, L. (2018). Legal ontology for modelling GDPR concepts and norms. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications, 313, 91–100. ▇▇▇▇▇://▇▇▇.▇▇▇/10.3233/978-1-61499-935-5-91 ▇▇▇▇▇▇, ▇.▇.(2020). Representing Activities associated with Processing of Personal Data and Consent using Semantic Web for GDPR Compliance. [PhD Thesis]. Trinity College Dublin. ▇▇▇▇▇://▇▇▇▇▇▇.▇▇▇/research/publications/035-representing-activities- processing-personal-data-consent-semweb-gdpr-compliance ▇▇▇▇▇▇, M., ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, ▇., & ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇-▇▇▇▇▇▇,V.(2019). Linked Democracy. Springer.
Appears in 1 contract
Sources: Grant Agreement
Blockchain. Solutions for a responsible use of the blockchain in the context of personal data. ▇▇▇▇▇://▇▇▇.▇▇▇▇.▇▇/sites/default/files/atoms/files/blockchain_en.pdf ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, ▇. (2014). Research design: qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). SAGE. Data Privacy Vocabulary -DPV (2021). Data Privacy Vocabulary (DPV) (Version 0.2). Draft Community Group Report, 13 January 2021. ▇▇▇▇▇://▇▇▇▇▇.▇▇▇▇▇▇.▇▇/dpv-gdpr/ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, ▇.M., & ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, P. (2017). An experimental investigation of knowledge acquisition techniques. Journal of Management Development, 36(4), 493– 514. ▇▇▇▇▇://▇▇▇.▇▇▇/10.1108/JMD-07-2016-0132 ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, ▇., & ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇-▇▇▇▇▇▇, V. (2021 forthcoming). Analysis of Ontologies and Policy Languages to Represent Information Flows in GDPR, submitted to Semantic Web Journal (2703-3917). ▇▇▇▇://▇▇▇.▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇-▇▇▇- ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇.▇▇▇/▇▇▇▇▇▇/▇▇▇▇▇/▇▇▇▇▇▇▇.▇▇▇. European Union Blockchain Observatory & Forum. (2020). Report on EU Blockchain Ecosystems Developments, 20 November 2020. ▇▇▇▇▇://▇▇▇.▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇.▇▇/sites/default/files/reports/EU%20Block chain%20Ecosystem%20Report_final_0.pdf ▇▇▇▇▇, B.▇., ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, ▇.▇., ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, N., ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, ▇.▇. & ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, R.(2019. BPDIMS: A blockchain-based personal data and identity management system. In Proceedings of the 52nd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. ▇▇▇▇, ▇.(2019)Blockchain and the General Data Protection Regulation. Can distributed ledgers be squared with European data protection law? EPRS, European Parliamentary Research Service. Scientific Foresight Unit (STOA), PE 634.445 – July (2019). ▇▇▇▇▇://▇▇▇.▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇.▇▇▇▇▇▇.▇▇/RegData/etudes/STUD/2019/634445/EPRS_STU (2019)634445_EN.pdf ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, ▇. & ▇▇▇▇▇, J.(2019▇.(2019). A unified framework of five principles for AI in society. Harvard Data Science Review. 1(1). ▇▇▇▇▇://▇▇▇.▇▇▇/10.1162/99608f92.8cd550d1 Governatori, G., Idelberger, F., ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, Z., ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, R., ▇▇▇▇▇▇, G. & ▇▇, X. (2018). On legal contracts, imperative and declarative smart contracts, and blockchain systems. Artificial Intelligence and Law, 26(4),377-409. Governatori, G., ▇▇▇▇▇▇, ▇., ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, ▇. ▇▇▇▇▇▇, M., ▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇, ▇.,▇▇▇▇▇▇, M.▇., & ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, P. (2020). `Rules as Code’ will let computers apply laws and regulations.But over-rigid interpretations would undermine our freedoms. The Conversation, 26 November 2020, ▇▇▇▇▇://▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇.▇▇▇/rules-as-code-will-let-computers-apply- laws-and-regulations-but-over-rigid-interpretations-would-undermine- our-freedoms-149992 ▇▇▇▇▇▇, ▇., ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, ▇., & ▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇, ▇.(2018). TERECOM2018@ JURIX, Technologies for Regulatory Compliance “Legal Compliance Through Design: Preliminary Results of a Literature Survey”. TERECOM2018@ JURIX, Technologies for Regulatory Compliance. ▇▇▇▇://▇▇▇▇-▇▇.▇▇▇/Vol- 2309/06.pdf ▇▇▇▇▇▇, ▇., Governatori, G.▇., ▇▇▇, H.P. & ▇▇▇▇, ▇.▇.(2018. & ▇▇▇▇, M.T.(2018). Are we done with business process compliance: state of the art and challenges ahead. Knowledge and Information Systems,57(1),79-133. ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, ▇., ▇▇▇▇▇▇, ▇.G., ▇▇▇ ▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇, ▇., ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, ▇., ▇▇ ▇▇▇▇,▇., ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, ▇., & ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, R. (2020). Populating legal ontologies using semantic role labeling. Artificial Intelligence and Law, 1-41. ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, ▇., ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, ▇., & ▇’▇▇▇▇▇, M. ▇. (2018). Privacy, security and policies: A review of problems and solutions with semantic web technologies. Semantic Web, 9(2), 153–161. ▇▇▇▇, ▇., & ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, ▇. ▇. (2012). Privacy analysis using ontologies. In ▇. ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, & ▇. ▇. ▇▇▇▇▇▇ (Eds.), 2nd. ACM Conference on Data and Application Security and Privacy, CODASPY 2012 (pp. 205-216). ACM. ▇▇▇▇, ▇., ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, ▇. ▇., ▇▇▇▇▇, ▇., & ▇▇▇▇, A. ▇. (2011). Privacy verification using ontologies. In Sixth International Conference on Availability, Reliability and Security, ARES 2011 (pp. 627-632). IEEE Computer Society ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇-▇▇▇▇▇▇▇,▇.,▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇-▇▇▇▇▇▇, V., ▇▇▇▇▇▇-▇▇▇▇▇▇, P., & ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇,I. ▇. (2018). Lynx and the Legal Knowledge Graph: Integrating lexical and terminological resources with legal data. Kernerman Dict. News, 261565– 47 (26), 2–5. ▇▇▇▇▇▇, ▇. (2011). Social research methods: qualitative and quantitative approaches (7th ed.). Allyn & Bacon. ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, M., & Governatori, G. ▇. (2018). Modelling legal knowledge for GDPR compliance checking. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications, 313, 101–110. ▇▇▇▇▇://▇▇▇.▇▇▇/10.3233/978-1-61499-935-5- 101 ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, M., Martoni▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, ▇., ▇▇▇▇▇, ▇., Bartolini▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, ▇., & ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, L. ▇. (2018). Legal ontology for modelling GDPR concepts and norms. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications, 313, 91–100. ▇▇▇▇▇://▇▇▇.▇▇▇/10.3233/978-1-61499-935-5-91 ▇▇▇▇▇▇, ▇.▇.(2020). Representing Activities associated with Processing of Personal Data and Consent using Semantic Web for GDPR Compliance. [PhD Thesis]. Trinity College Dublin. ▇▇▇▇▇://▇▇▇▇▇▇.▇▇▇/research/publications/035-representing-activities- processing-personal-data-consent-semweb-gdpr-compliance ▇▇▇▇▇▇, M.▇., ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, ▇.P., & ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇-▇▇▇▇▇▇,V.(2019). Linked Democracy. Springer.
Appears in 1 contract
Sources: Grant Agreement