Authority and Decision Making Sample Clauses

Authority and Decision Making. 3.1 The Alliance Board will have delegated authority arising from its members to approve or reject items presented for consideration within the authority delegated to the members from their employing Party. In order to be binding on the Parties, the decisions of the Alliance Provider Board will need to be made by consensus, i.e. all four parties to the alliance must agree. 3.2 It will be for each of the Parties to identify their executive level representative and delegate authority to make decisions on behalf of that Party to that representative, within the scope of their role and as defined by that Party and as restricted by its scheme of delegation and schedule of reserved matters. 3.3 The members of the Alliance Provider Board will be responsible for reporting decisions made by the Board and any obstacles to decision making to their appointing Party through established assurance processes. Each Party will put in place arrangements for the feedback loop into their assurance processes and notify the other Parties the basis on which its member reports back to it. 3.4 The Alliance Provider Board will operate within each parties procurement and contracting procedure rules.

Authority and Decision Making. While the primary responsibility of the project rests with the funded Recipient, the PCG is comprised of relevant parties, with appropriate experience, to provide strategic direction and advice.

Authority and Decision Making. The following table outlines the scope of authority and decision making of the various committees, teams and working groups described in the governance framework. Any decision made by a governance committee that is within the operating mandate of that committee will be: • made by the mutual consensus of the Province committee members on the one hand, and the Contractor committee members on the other hand; and • binding upon the parties (unless decided otherwise by a committee having authority to do so). Decisions that extend beyond the mandate of the committee will be escalated to the next appropriate committee as indicated in this Schedule, and where no such committee is indicated, to the Joint Executive Committee. All decisions made by the committees will, where appropriate, follow the Change Order Process. All decisions will be recorded in meeting minutes and a notice of each decision will be sent to affected parties. GOVERNANCE COMMITTEE AUTHORITY TO MAKE DECISIONS ON ISSUES Joint Relationship Sponsors For the Province – the Assistant Deputy Minister – Knowledge Management and Technology For the Contractor – the Senior Vice President – Western Canada Issues that significantly impact the health of the relationship between the parties Joint Executive Committee (JEC) Issues that significantly impact: - Scope - Transition - Timeframes - Budget Allocation - Stakeholder relations Official Plans and Priorities Issues impacting the parties including: - Legislative - Policy - Privacy and security - Issues escalated from the Joint Management Committee Contractor and Province Service Level Appeals Joint Management Committee (JMC) Issues that impact: - Scope, including new project approvals and changes to Service Descriptions - Timeframes - Budget Management - Stakeholder Relations - Performance and Service Levels - Resource sufficiency and availability - CITS relationship Issues escalated from JOC, Working Groups, Project and/or Operational Teams . GOVERNANCE COMMITTEE AUTHORITY TO MAKE DECISIONS ON ISSUES Risk mitigation strategies Joint Operations Committee (JOC) Issues that impact: - Day-to-day operations - Operational change management - Problem and incident review and follow-up - Performance and Service Levels Working Groups Review, assess, provide input, and advice regarding issues (no decision making authority unless delegated). Project and Operational Teams Day to day decisions and issue resolution for items within the scope of their respective mandates a...