Assessment frameworks Sample Clauses

Assessment frameworks. Both EAPAA and NVAO accredit at programme level and the contents of the frameworks they apply are to a very large extent overlapping. This is the case for NVAO's limited as well as extensive programme assessment. The main difference between the accreditation frameworks is the level of detail: the EAPAA framework is specifically focused on the discipline of public administration. In order to ensure workable conditions, the NVAO framework is used as a starting point, with further and more detailed specifications regarding the following topics:
Sample 1Sample 2
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Assessment frameworks. The main difference between the assessment frameworks of AACSB and NVAO is their perspective: AACSB accredits at institutional level and the NVAO accredits at program level. The following paragraphs discuss the combining of the assessment frameworks. An important principle in the cooperation is that both levels (institutional and program) are assessed by the panel in order to ensure valid decision-making processes for both accreditation organizations. 3a. AACSB Initial Accreditation & NVAO The AACSB assessment framework for the initial accreditation is an extended framework that covers, among other standards, the first three standards of the limited program assessment of the NVAO. The fourth standard of the latter mentioned framework, concerning achieved learning outcomes, is not covered in the AACSB framework. The panel will assess this standard according to the procedures described in the NVAO framework. Workable conditions (the number of theses1 the panel needs to assess) will be determined per audit. Following discussion with the review team the organization under review may decide to outsource the assessment of theses to a third party. In principle, the panel will assess at least 15 theses for each program. A reduction of this number can only be considered if programs share an Examination Board and if there is a demonstrable overlap of courses between the programs of at least one year or 60 EC for a bachelor’s program and 20 EC for a master’s program. In that case the panel will assess a minimum of 8-10 theses per program. NVAO must agree before the start of the assessment to the reduction in the number of theses to be assessed. The extensive program assessment of the NVAO is also mostly covered by the AACSB initial accreditation framework. Standard 11 of the NVAO framework, concerning achieved learning outcomes, is the only standard that is not covered in the AACSB initial accreditation framework. The panel will assess this standard according to the procedures described in the NVAO framework. Workable conditions (the number of theses2 the committee needs to assess) will be determined per audit. Following discussion with the review team the organization under review may decide to outsource the assessment of theses to a third party. The same rules pertaining to the possible reduction of the number of theses to be assessed that are stated above for the limited program assessment apply to the extensive program assessment. In addition to the assessment of...
Sample 1Sample 2

Related to Assessment frameworks

  • ASSESSMENT REPORT Within 120 days following the general election held on November 2nd 2003, the returning officer of the munici- pality shall forward, in accordance with section 659.3 of the Act respecting elections and referendums in munici- palities (R.S.Q., c. E-2.2), an assessment report to the Chief Electoral Officer and the Minister setting out relevant ways to improve the trial and addressing, in particular, the following points : — the preparations for the election (choice of the new method of voting, communications plan, etc.) ; — the conduct of the advance poll and the poll ; — the cost of using the electronic voting system : – the cost of adapting election procedures ; – non-recurrent costs likely to be amortized ; – a comparison between the actual polling costs and the estimated polling costs using the new methods of voting and the projected cost of holding the general election on November 2nd 2003 using traditional methods ; — the number and duration of incidents during which voting was stopped, if any ; — the advantages and disadvantages of using the new method of voting ; — the results obtained during the addition of the votes and the correspondence between the number of ballot paper cards issued to the deputy returning officers and the number of ballot paper cards returned used and unused ; — the examination of rejected ballot papers, if it has been completed.

  • Performance Assessment 6.1 The Performance Plan (Annexure A) to this Agreement sets out key performance indicators and competencies that needs to be evaluated in terms of –

  • Assessment Center A promotional candidate may not appeal or dispute the Assessment Center or scoring of the Assessment Center to an administrative or judicial body except for fraud committed by an assessor.

  • Assessment and updates 12.1 Various opportunities are provided to keep you up to date with your child’s progress. You will receive two comprehensive written reports each year and arrangements will be made for at least one interview where you can discuss your child’s development with their teacher. In addition, you can always contact the School to arrange a meeting if you have any concerns or wish to receive an update on progress.

  • Diagnostic Assessment 6.3.1 Boards shall provide a list of pre-approved assessment tools consistent with their Board improvement plan for student achievement and which is compliant with Ministry of Education PPM (PPM 155: Diagnostic Assessment in Support of Student Learning, date of issue January 7, 2013).

  • Ergonomic Assessments At the request of the employee, the College will ensure that an ergonomic assessment of the employee’s work station is completed by a person trained by the Department of Labor and Industries or comparable trainer to conduct ergonomic assessments. Solutions to identified issues/concerns will be implemented within available resources.

  • Risk Assessment An assessment of any risks inherent in the work requirements and actions to mitigate these risks.

  • Conformity Assessment Procedures 1. Each Party shall give positive consideration to accepting the results of conformity assessment procedures of other Parties, even where those procedures differ from its own, provided it is satisfied that those procedures offer an assurance of conformity with applicable technical regulations or standards equivalent to its own procedures.

  • Data Protection Impact Assessments Xxxx shall provide reasonable assistance to Client with any data protection impact assessments, and prior consultations with a Supervisory Authority, required under Data Protection Laws, in each case solely in relation to Processing of Personal Data by, and taking into account the nature of the Processing and information available to, Xxxx.

  • Conformity Assessment 1. The Parties recognize that a broad range of mechanisms exists to facilitate the acceptance of conformity assessment procedures and results thereby, including:

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.