Assessment/Evaluation Workflow Clause Samples
The Assessment/Evaluation Workflow clause defines the procedures and steps required to review, assess, or evaluate a product, service, or deliverable under the agreement. Typically, this clause outlines the criteria for assessment, the parties responsible for conducting evaluations, and the timelines for completing each stage of the workflow. For example, it may specify that the client must review submitted work within a set number of days and provide written feedback or approval. The core function of this clause is to ensure a clear, structured process for evaluation, reducing misunderstandings and delays by setting expectations for both parties.
Assessment/Evaluation Workflow ePortfolios may be used as a formative or a summative assessment tool, or as both. Specific "help" is embedded into the application to guide users through the process of assessment and evaluation. During training with administrators, assessors and students, the workflow cycle is described and demonstrated. Specific assessment and evaluation processes are dependent upon the assessment goals of the institution. An example of workflow is:
1) Faculty develops the Table of Contents describing the specific elements of the portfolio;
2) Faculty link rubrics to the Table of Contents;
3) Students create the necessary artifacts (and reflections) and submit them to assessors for assessment;
4) Notice of pending assessments are received by the assessor via e-mail that contain links to the login screen so that the assessor may go to assessment immediately if desired;
5) Assessors review student submissions and score the work using the linked rubric(s);
6) Administrators (and sub-administrators) may aggregate/disaggregate assessment data collected to date. When students login to see their assessments, they are automatically informed if there are any new assessment results to be seen.