Alternative Quantification Method Clause Samples

Alternative Quantification Method. A facility may use the alternative quantification method if it can verifiably demonstrate that it was consistently achieving >98% annual sulphur capture rate, using sulphur mass balance, or other provincially accepted methodology for three consecutive years preceding the year the Agreement comes into force. 10.1.1. For quantification, reporting and verification requirements under the Agreement, a facility that meets the above requirements has the option of using: i) the following alternative quantification method: • calculate the total amount of sulphur entering the process; • calculate the total sulphur inventory change during the month (list sources and add the individual monthly changes); • add or subtract, as appropriate, the total sulphur inventory change to the total amount of sulphur entering the process; • determine the sulphur released into the atmosphere using a Continuous Emissions Monitoring System; • calculate the total amount of sulphur captured in products, by-products and wastes by subtracting the total sulphur released from the total sulphur entering the process; • calculate the percent sulphur capture rate. or ii) another method accepted by provincial regulatory authorities upon review and concurrence by EC.
Alternative Quantification Method. Given the amount and quality of bicycling-related research and data collection since Caltrans published the CMAQ method in 2005, it is now possible to develop a method for calculating VMT reductions from new bicycle facilities that relies solely on bicycling count data, without using vehicular ADT. Such an alternative method was developed and explained in the companion Bike Facility Report. The reviewed literature provides insufficient data to develop generalizable pedestrian- specific values for all the inputs for the alternative quantification method. But the approach – using active transportation counts instead of vehicular ADT to quantify VMT reductions – is just as well suited to pedestrian facilities as it is to bicycle facilities. One reason to rely on pedestrian – just like bicycling – count data rather than vehicular ADT used in the current methodology is that using vehicular ADT assumes that higher auto volumes correlate to higher pedestrian volumes, which is often not the case. For example, a high-volume arterial running from suburban residential developments in a hilly area to a freeway accessing the metropolitan job center 10 miles away could easily have high vehicular volume but low to no volume of pedestrians walking for transport, due to the topography and distance to non-residential developments. On the other hand, a high-volume arterial in a flat area with high accessibility to residential, commercial and retail uses could have substantial pedestrian traffic, just as the stretch of Telegraph Avenue in the Uptown neighborhood of Oakland, California did even before the city improved pedestrian street crossings, installed Class IV cycle tracks on both sides of the street, and completed other streetscape improvements (▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ & ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, 2016). Just as with bicycling counts, pedestrian counts inherently account for factors like topography and distance that will limit transport walking with or without pedestrian facilities. By contrast, using vehicular ADT requires applying adjustment factors like the proximity to “activity centers” proxy used in CARB’s current method. Equation 3, as discussed in more detail in the companion Bike Facility Report and modified below for use with pedestrian facilities, is one potential method to estimate VMT reductions from new pedestrian facilities without using vehicular ADT. And while there is insufficient data in the reviewed literature to develop generalizable pedestrian- specific values for all the inputs f...
Alternative Quantification Method. A facility may use the alternative quantification method if it can verifiably demonstrate that it was consistently achieving >98% annual sulphur capture rate, using sulphur mass balance, or other provincially accepted methodology for three consecutive years preceding the year the Agreement comes into force.

Related to Alternative Quantification Method

  • Long Term Cost Evaluation Criterion 4. READ CAREFULLY and see in the RFP document under "Proposal Scoring and Evaluation". Points will be assigned to this criterion based on your answer to this Attribute. Points are awarded if you agree not increase your catalog prices (as defined herein) more than X% annually over the previous year for the life of the contract, unless an exigent circumstance exists in the marketplace and the excess price increase which exceeds X% annually is supported by documentation provided by you and your suppliers and shared with TIPS, if requested. If you agree NOT to increase prices more than 5%, except when justified by supporting documentation, you are awarded 10 points; if 6% to 14%, except when justified by supporting documentation, you receive 1 to 9 points incrementally. Price increases 14% or greater, except when justified by supporting documentation, receive 0 points. increases will be 5% or less annually per question Required Confidentiality Claim Form This completed form is required by TIPS. By submitting a response to this solicitation you agree to download from the “Attachments” section, complete according to the instructions on the form, then uploading the completed form, with any confidential attachments, if applicable, to the “Response Attachments” section titled “Confidentiality Form” in order to provide to TIPS the completed form titled, “CONFIDENTIALITY CLAIM FORM”. By completing this process, you provide us with the information we require to comply with the open record laws of the State of Texas as they may apply to your proposal submission. If you do not provide the form with your proposal, an award will not be made if your proposal is qualified for an award, until TIPS has an accurate, completed form from you. Read the form carefully before completing and if you have any questions, email ▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇ at TIPS at ▇▇▇▇.▇▇▇▇▇▇@▇▇▇▇-▇▇▇.▇▇▇ If the vendor is awarded a contract with TIPS under this solicitation, the vendor agrees to make any Choice of Law clauses in any contract or agreement entered into between the awarded vendor and with a TIPS member entity to read as follows: "Choice of law shall be the laws of the state where the customer resides" or words to that effect.

  • Long Term Cost Evaluation Criterion # 4 READ CAREFULLY and see in the RFP document under "Proposal Scoring and Evaluation". Points will be assigned to this criterion based on your answer to this Attribute. Points are awarded if you agree not i ncrease your catalog prices (as defined herein) more than X% annually over the previous year for years two and thr ee and potentially year four, unless an exigent circumstance exists in the marketplace and the excess price increase which exceeds X% annually is supported by documentation provided by you and your suppliers and shared with TIP S, if requested. If you agree NOT to increase prices more than 5%, except when justified by supporting documentati on, you are awarded 10 points; if 6% to 14%, except when justified by supporting documentation, you receive 1 to 9 points incrementally. Price increases 14% or greater, except when justified by supporting documentation, receive 0 points. increases will be 5% or less annually per question Required Confidentiality Claim Form This completed form is required by TIPS. By submitting a response to this solicitation you agree to download from th e “Attachments” section, complete according to the instructions on the form, then uploading the completed form, wit h any confidential attachments, if applicable, to the “Response Attachments” section titled “Confidentiality Form” in order to provide to TIPS the completed form titled, “CONFIDENTIALITY CLAIM FORM”. By completing this process, you provide us with the information we require to comply with the open record laws of the State of Texas as they ma y apply to your proposal submission. If you do not provide the form with your proposal, an award will not be made if your proposal is qualified for an award, until TIPS has an accurate, completed form from you. Read the form carefully before completing and if you have any questions, email ▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇ at TIPS at ▇▇▇▇.▇▇▇▇▇▇@t ▇▇▇-▇▇▇.▇▇▇

  • Sector Sub-Sector Industry Classification Level of Government Type of Obligation Description of Measure Source of Measure All sectors : : - : Central : National Treatment Senior Management and Board of Directors : National Treatment and the Senior Management and Board of Directors obligations shall not apply to any measure relating to small and medium sized domestic market enterprise2. Foreign equity is restricted to a maximum of 40% for domestic market enterprises with paid-in equity capital of less than the equivalent of USD 200,000 Note: Members of the Board of Directors or governing body of corporation or associations shall be allowed in proportion to their allowable participation or share in the capital of such enterprises. : -1987 Constitution of the Republic of the Philippines. - Foreign Investments Act of 1991 (R.A. No. 7042, as amended by R.A. No. 8179). -Presidential and Administrative Issuances. ∞ 2 The concept of a small and medium sized domestic market enterprise is an enterprise with paid in equity capital of less than the equivalent of USD 200,000.00.

  • Measuring EPP parameters Every 5 minutes, EPP probes will select one “IP address” of the EPP servers of the TLD being monitored and make an “EPP test”; every time they should alternate between the 3 different types of commands and between the commands inside each category. If an “EPP test” result is undefined/unanswered, the EPP service will be considered as unavailable from that probe until it is time to make a new test.

  • Acceptance Criteria The Services and Deliverables must meet the following acceptance criteria or the JBE may reject the applicable Services or Deliverables. The JBE may use the attached Acceptance and Signoff Form to notify Contractor of the acceptance or rejection of the Services and Deliverables. Contractor will not be paid for any rejected Services or Deliverables.