Adjudication Data Sample Clauses

Adjudication Data. During the current audit, there were still a few areas of significantly incomplete, missing, or incorrectly categorized data. The IMT expects that OPD should be able to attain compliance with Task 40.2 soon, but had to find it not yet compliant. “By June 28, 2005, OPD must develop a policy for the use of PAS, including supervising and auditing the performance of specific members, employees, supervisors, managers and OPD units, as well as OPD as a whole. The Settlement Agreement sets forth extensive requirements regarding how PIMS must be used.” • Subcommittee on the Personnel Information Management System • Chief of Police Memorandum, Personnel Information Management System (May 15, 2003) • Revised Departmental General Order M-5, Case Evaluation and Report Review Notice • Report Writing Manual Insert E-3 • Department General Order D-17, PAS Purpose • Case Evaluation and Report Review Notice form See Task 40. The integrated data system required under Task 40 supports an administrative process, set out under Task 41, whereby OPD members and employees who demonstrate certain at-risk behavior are subject to identification, review, monitoring or intervention by their supervisors and commanders. Certain subtasks found compliant in the November 2008 IMT audit of Task 41 were not reassessed for the current audit since the IMT found no indication that their compliance status has changed. Also, during the period under review, according to OPD, no members under PAS jurisdiction were transferred for making unsatisfactory progress. Accordingly, as during the last audit, Tasks 41.28, 41.28.1 and 41.28.2 were not applicable during this audit. The IMT found OPD in compliance with all but two of Task 41’s thirty-plus provisions. Given the high level of compliance with most of the task, the IMT would have found OPD in conditional compliance with Task 41, except that one of the two non-compliant tasks, Task 41.21, showed troubling signs of mendacity.