Acceptable Quality Levels Sample Clauses
The Acceptable Quality Levels clause defines the minimum standards or thresholds that products or services must meet to be considered satisfactory under a contract. Typically, this clause specifies measurable criteria such as defect rates, performance benchmarks, or inspection results that are used to assess whether deliverables are acceptable. By establishing clear quality expectations, the clause helps prevent disputes over subpar work and ensures both parties understand the required level of quality for successful contract fulfillment.
Acceptable Quality Levels. The acceptable quality levels (AQLs) included in Attachment A2, Performance Requirements Summary Table, for contractor performance, are structured to allow the contractor to manage how the work is performed while providing negative incentives for performance shortfalls.
Acceptable Quality Levels. The Acceptable Quality Levels (AQLs) require a minimum of 90% of the quarterly inspections to score a rating of 90 or higher. The QASP is structured to allow the Contractor to manage how the work is performed while providing negative feedback for performance shortfalls.
Acceptable Quality Levels. A. Contractor agrees to maintain a quality control system for all Products to be delivered hereunder that will eliminate rejects and will strive toward a goal of zero defects. Such a system shall include process controls that will provide for inspection and verification of all critical parameters or operations on a regular or continuing basis throughout the manufacturing process.
B. Contractor agrees to maintain a minimum 95% acceptable quality level and a 95% on-time delivery level as measured by the City’s quality reporting system and based on acceptable lots versus rejected lots at the City’s facility. The City may terminate this Agreement, with no liability on fifteen (15) days written notice if Contractor’s six (6) month quality rating falls below the minimum acceptable quality level.
Acceptable Quality Levels. The option years will not be exercised if quality is found to be below 90% acceptable for the duration of the annual period of performance. Payment will be made for the number of seedlings actually packed, as recorded on daily packing sheets, based on inspections, and verified by Government Inspectors, except as may be reduced for unsatisfactory performance or increased for premium performance. More than 15 infractions in Lifting and Packing Group 1 or two in Group 2 will be considered unacceptable performance for the day. Unacceptable work or work methods are listed in the following 2 groups. Group 1- Lifting