Academic Misconduct Clause Samples
The Academic Misconduct clause defines the standards of behavior expected from students or academic participants regarding honesty and integrity in their academic work. It typically outlines prohibited actions such as plagiarism, cheating, fabrication of data, or unauthorized collaboration, and may describe the procedures for investigating and addressing violations. The core function of this clause is to uphold academic integrity by deterring dishonest practices and providing a clear framework for handling breaches, thereby ensuring fairness and trust within the academic environment.
Academic Misconduct. Should any instance of academic misconduct arise, it is strongly suggested that the instructor confer with the Department Chair on the proper manner in which to proceed. A statement on penalties should be included in syllabus. Additional information on the student code of conduct can be found in the current SCF Catalog at ▇▇▇▇://▇▇▇▇▇▇▇.▇▇▇.▇▇▇/content.php?catoid=6&navoid=442 and the Student Handbook/Planner.
Academic Misconduct. Review the Code of Student Behavior published in the annual web-based Student Handbook on the ▇▇▇▇ of Students website (▇▇▇▇://▇▇▇.▇▇▇/deanofstudents/code) that defines and explains academic misconduct and disciplinary action. The policies cover a variety of forms, including cheating, fabrication, and plagiarism. If you are found guilty of academic misconduct in this class, you will receive a grade of “F,” and you may be dismissed from your degree program and possibly from the University. Regarding this online course, participation in group discussions is encouraged, but any irrelevant discussion or chat will not be permitted. Follow the link to get an electronic copy of the Code of Student Behavior: ▇▇▇▇://▇▇▇.▇▇▇.▇▇▇/media/5599064/d16-117185-student-planner-pages-updated-9-2016.pdf
Academic Misconduct. All coursework must be the student’s own work. If any student is found to have engaged in plagiarism or cheated in any assessment she/he will be subject to the College’s procedure on cheating in assessment.
Academic Misconduct. Students enrolled in Business courses at the University of ▇▇▇▇▇▇ are expected to adhere rigorously to principles of intellectual integrity. Plagiarism is a form of intellectual dishonesty in which another person’s work is presented as one’s own. Plagiarism or cheating on examinations/assignments is a serious offence that may result in a zero grade on an assignment, a failing grade in a course, or expulsion from the University. For more information on this matter, please consult §5.13.
Academic Misconduct. Definition Academic misconduct is defined as:
Academic Misconduct. 18.1 All academic offences are serious and will be dealt with using the Academic Misconduct Policy and Procedure, available in full from the Latest Policies webpage and on the VLE for enrolled students under Policies for Students. Academic misconduct is defined as ‘any attempt by a student, or any attempt by an individual to aid a student, to gain an unfair advantage in any assessment (including an assessment of practice or an assessment in practice) by deception or fraudulent means’. Academic offences include behaviours such as, cheating, collusion, acquiring or buying material or paying another person to complete an assignment, and Plagiarism. It is also an offence to assist another student to do any of these things. A non-exhaustive list of examples of behaviours or actions which may constitute academic misconduct is available within the policy and in the Student Handbook you will receive when you enrol.
Academic Misconduct. School policies are enforced in our classroom as well. Students are expected to always follow classroom rules and school policies. Any form of misconduct will not be tolerated and will receive the following consequences.
Academic Misconduct. 4.2.1 Maintaining fair and honest conduct is an essential requirement of the system for assessing students’ learning. There are policies for academic offences in taught awards. For more information, see the HE Academic Misconduct Policy and Procedure.
4.2.2 The definitions of academic misconduct assume dishonest intent. An academic offence is an attempt by a student to gain an unfair advantage in any assessment (including in practice) by deception or fraudulent means. The following are examples of academic offences, and it is also an offence to assist a student to do any of these things: • Plagiarism: representing another person’s work as your own or using another person’s work without acknowledgement, and duplication or ‘self-plagiarism,’ using material that has already been submitted for assessment or the submission or presentation of work as one's own which is substantially the ideas or intellectual data of another or created artificially • Buying material or paying another person to complete an assignment, or using editors, translators or proof-readers who contribute significantly to the content • Misconduct in examinations or tests: such as copying or communicating, using notes or other prompts, calculator fraud • Impersonation, forgery, bribery, falsifying data • False claims of mitigating/exceptional circumstances
4.2.3 To prevent plagiarism, protect the intellectual property of both UCKM and its students and to assist with feedback to students, UCKM may use plagiarism detection software or other technology as appropriate.
4.2.4 All academic offences are serious. A second or subsequent offence or an offence compounded by lying or deception, or aggravated in some other way may be treated as more serious even if it would usually be considered a lesser offence.
4.2.5 If you plagiarise your assignment work, the College will be required to report you to the relevant qualification awarding body and you may be subject to disciplinary action as a result.
4.2.6 Identification of plagiarism will be assessed using the AMBeR Tariff System. Details of this are available through your Programme Teams page on enrolment.
4.2.7 In summary, any academic offence of this nature will be scored based on the level of study, evidence of previous occurrences, the amount of material identified as an issue, the weighting of the piece of work in question and any evidence of means to hide any possible academic offence. This determines the level of penalty in response to the offe...
Academic Misconduct. Should any instance of academic misconduct arise, it is strongly suggested that the instructor confer with the Department Chair on the proper manner in which to proceed. Additional information on the student code of conduct can be found in the current SCF Catalog at ▇▇▇▇://▇▇▇.▇▇▇.▇▇▇ and the Student Handbook/Planner. Plagiarism is defined as the use of ideas, facts, opinions, illustrative material, data, direct or indirect wording of another scholar and/or writer-professional or student-without giving proper credit. If a student is found guilty of plagiarism, he/she will receive a zero (“0”) for the assignment and an “F” for the course. Faculties are expected to abide by the copyright laws. Guidelines regarding the current laws, especially as they relate to photocopying, videotaping and computer software are available in the Adjunct Faculty Handbook at ▇▇▇▇://▇▇▇.▇▇▇.▇▇▇/pages/▇▇▇.▇▇▇. A student may file a grievance through due process. Procedures for such due process are on file in the Division Office. These procedures provide all students of SCF with an orderly process for resolving complaints arising from the interpretation and applications of policies and practice involving academic and student affairs.
Academic Misconduct. Should any instance of academic misconduct arise, it is strongly suggested that the instructor confer with the Department Chair on the proper manner in which to proceed. Additional information on the student code of conduct can be found in the current MCC Catalog at ▇▇▇▇://▇▇▇.▇▇▇▇▇.▇▇▇ Plagiarism is defined as the use of ideas, facts, opinions, illustrative material, data, direct or indirect wording of another scholar and/or writer-professional or student-without giving proper credit. If a student is found guilty of plagiarism, he/she will receive a zero (“0”) for the assignment and an “F” for the course. Faculties are expected to abide by the copyright laws. Guidelines regarding the current laws, especially as they relate to photocopying, videotaping and computer software are available in the Adjunct Faculty Handbook at ▇▇▇▇://▇▇▇▇▇▇▇.▇▇▇▇▇.▇▇▇/AdjunctNotebook/AdjunctNotebook.htm A student may file a grievance through due process. Procedures for such due process are on file in the Division Office. These procedures provide all students of MCC with an orderly process for resolving complaints arising from the interpretation and applications of policies and practice involving academic and student affairs.
