THIS STIPULATION AND SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT (WITH MINOR CHILDREN), madeStipulation and Settlement Agreement • December 20th, 2022
(insert Defendant’s name). Within this doc- ument we understand that we may be referred to individually as Plaintiff, Defendant, Spouse(s), Parent(s) or Party(ies).
BEFORE THE ARKANSAS PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION IN THE MATTER OF THE MOTION OF THE ) GENERAL STAFF OF THE ARKANSAS ) PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION TO ) DOCKET NO. 98-339-U ESTABLISH A DOCKET TO DETERMINE ) THE REASONABLENESS OF THE RATES OF ) SOUTHWESTERN...Stipulation and Settlement Agreement • February 14th, 2000 • CSW Credit Inc
STIPULATION AND SETTLEMENT AGREEMENTStipulation and Settlement Agreement • July 8th, 2019 • Minnesota
This Stipulation and Settlement Agreement (“Agreement”) is entered into by and among Plaintiffs T.F. by his next friend Tracy Keller; K.D. by his next friend Laura Ferenci; C.O. by her next friend Laura Ferenci; L.L. by his next friend Gerald Kegler; T.T. and M.T. by their next friend Dr. Caryn Zembrosky; T.M., T.E., and A.T. by their next friend James Dorsey; A.W. by his next friend Margaret Shulman; I.W., D.W., and B.W. by their next friend Gloria Anderson; and J.W. by her next friend Margaret Shulman (collectively, “Plaintiffs”), individually and on behalf of the Settlement Classes (as hereinafter defined), on the one hand, and Hennepin County; Hennepin County Department of Human Services and Public Health; David J. Hough, Hennepin County Administrator; Jennifer DeCubellis, Hennepin County Deputy Administrator for Health and Human Services; Jodi Wentland, Hennepin County Director of Human Services (collectively “Hennepin County Defendants”)1 and Tony Lourey, Commissioner, Minnesota
STIPULATION AND SETTLEMENT AGREEMENTStipulation and Settlement Agreement • October 19th, 2010
Come now the parties above-named, and for the purpose of aiding the Court in the disposition of the divorce action pending before it, hereby stipulate and agree as follows:
CLINT MILLIEN and FELIPE KELLY, : Civil Action No. 1:17-cv-04000Stipulation and Settlement Agreement • June 18th, 2019 • New York
This Stipulation and Settlement Agreement (“Agreement” or “Settlement Agreement”) is made and entered into by and among the Named Plaintiffs Clint Millien and Felipe Kelly (“Named Plaintiffs”), individually and on behalf of the Settlement Class defined below, and The Madison Square Garden Company and MSGN Holdings, L.P. (“Defendants”). The Named Plaintiffs, the Settlement Class, and Defendants are jointly referred to in this Agreement as the “Parties,” or “Settling Parties,” and each of them as a “Party.”
STIPULATION AND SETTLEMENT AGREEMENTStipulation and Settlement Agreement • September 17th, 2021
Defendant’s name). Within this document we understand that we may be referred to individually as Plaintiff, Defendant, Spouse(s), Parent(s) or Party(ies).
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK FOR THE COUNTY OF NEW YORKStipulation and Settlement Agreement • October 19th, 2017
STATE OF NEW YORK ex rel. Plaintiff, -against- EXPRESS HOSPITALITY GROUP, A&R FOOD SERVICES, INC., YANKEE CLIPPER FOOD SERVICES I CORP., YANKEE CLIPPER FOOD SERVICES, INC., R&G FOOD SERVICES, INC., ROCCO MANNIELLO, MICHELE MANNIELLO, AND LISA MANNIELLO, Defendants. Index No. 100789/2015
Exhibit AStipulation and Settlement Agreement • May 5th, 2020 • Maryland
This Stipulation and Settlement Agreement dated June 5, 2018 (the “Stipulation” or the “Settlement Agreement”) is made and entered into on June 5, 2018, by and among the following Settling Parties (as defined further in Section IV hereof) to the above-entitled litigation (the “Litigation”): (i) the Lead Plaintiff (on behalf of himself and each of the Class Members), by and through his counsel of record in the Litigation; and (ii) the Defendants, by and through their counsel of record in the Litigation. The Stipulation is intended by the Settling Parties to fully, finally and forever resolve, discharge and settle the Released Claims, and to bar all future claims relating to the subject matter of the Litigation, upon and subject to the terms and conditions hereof.
STIPULATION AND SETTLEMENT AGREEMENTStipulation and Settlement Agreement • May 1st, 2018
On this da�/Jzof April, 2018, Debr Boening known personally to me to be the resident of Oak Beverages, Inc., appeared before the undersigned and acknowledged to me that she, as such officer and being authorized so to do, executed the within instrument for the purposes therein set forth, on behalf of Oalk Beverages foe. by her signature on the instrument s such officer.
BEFORE THE PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION OF UTAHStipulation and Settlement Agreement • May 1st, 2017
In the Matter of the Petition of Telrite Corporation d/b/a Life Wireless for Designation as an Eligible Telecommunications Carrier in the State of Utah ))))))) Docket No. 12-2553-01
STIPULATION AND SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT (WITH CHILDREN)Stipulation and Settlement Agreement • October 19th, 2010
Come now the parties above-named, and for the purpose of aiding the Court in the disposition of the divorce action pending before it, hereby stipulate and agree as follows:
STIPULATION AND SETTLEMENT AGREEMENTStipulation and Settlement Agreement • February 15th, 2018 • New York
WHEREAS, the Parties agree that Judgment was entered in favor of PLAINTIFF and as against the Defendants in the amount of $47,759.66. (“Judgment Balance”), and
STIPULATION AND SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN ATMOS ENERGY CORPORATION, TRIAL STAFF OF THE COLORADO PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION, AND ENERGY OUTREACH COLORADOStipulation and Settlement Agreement • December 20th, 2013
This Stipulation and Settlement Agreement (“Stipulation”) is entered into by and between Atmos Energy Corporation (“Atmos Energy” or the “Company”), Trial Staff of the Colorado Public Utilities Commission (“Staff”), and Energy Outreach Colorado (“EOC”), each of which is a “Settling Party” and collectively are the “Settling Parties”. The Settling Parties submit this Stipulation in resolution of all issues which were or could have been raised between the Settling Parties in this Proceeding and respectfully request that the Colorado Public Utilities Commission (“Commission”) approve this Stipulation for the purpose of resolving the issues in this Docket between the Settling Parties.
STIPULATION AND SETTLEMENT AGREEMENTStipulation and Settlement Agreement • June 2nd, 2016
This Stipulation and Settlement Agreement (the “Settlement Agreement”)1 is entered into, stipulated to, and agreed to by and between the Settling Parties, as set forth below:
BEFORE THE UTAH PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSIONStipulation and Settlement Agreement • September 19th, 2017
Petition of Assist Wireless, LLC for Designation as an Eligible Telecommunications Carrier in the State of Utah Docket No. 17-2597-01 ASSIST WIRELESS, LLC STIPULATION AND SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT
STIPULATION AND SETTLEMENT AGREEMENTStipulation and Settlement Agreement • March 4th, 2013
COME NOW the Staff (“Staff”) of the Missouri Public Service Commission (“Commission”) and Davidson Telecom, LLC (Davidson) by and through their respective undersigned counsel, and stipulate and agree as follows in settlement of the captioned cases:
STIPULATION AND SETTLEMENT AGREEMENTStipulation and Settlement Agreement • October 13th, 2023
DISH Wireless L.L.C. dba Gen Mobile (“DISH Wireless” or the “Company”), the Division of Public Utilities (“DPU”), and the Office of Consumer Services (“OCS”) (collectively, the “Stipulating Parties” or the “Parties”), through their undersigned representatives, enter into this Stipulation and Settlement Agreement (“Stipulation”) regarding the Petition filed by DISH Wireless in the instant docket. The Parties submit this Stipulation for approval by the Public Service Commission of Utah (the “Commission” or the “PSC”) pursuant to Utah Code Ann.
STIPULATION AND SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT DATED AS OFStipulation and Settlement Agreement • May 5th, 2020 • California
RECONCILIATION OF STRANDED COST RECOVERY AND ENERGY SERVICE CHARGES FOR 2018Stipulation and Settlement Agreement • October 30th, 2020
This Stipulation and Settlement Agreement (“Agreement”) is entered into as of the date written below between Public Service Company of New Hampshire d/b/a Eversource Energy (“Eversource” or the “Company”), the Staff of the Public Utilities Commission (“Staff”), and the Office of Consumer Advocate (“OCA”), collectively referred to as the “Settling Parties”. This Stipulation and Settlement Agreement is intended to resolve all of the issues in this proceeding.
BEFORE THE PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION OF UTAHStipulation and Settlement Agreement • May 15th, 2018
In the Matter of Budget PrePay, Inc. d/b/a Budget Mobile’s Petition for Limited Designation as a Non- Rural Wireless Eligible Telecommunications Carrier )))))) Docket No. 12-2554-01
STIPULATION AND SETTLEMENT AGREEMENTStipulation and Settlement Agreement • October 3rd, 2017 • Tampa Electric Co • Electric services
THIS AGREEMENT is dated this 27th day of September, 2017 and is by and between Tampa Electric Company (“Tampa Electric” or the “company”), the Office of Public Counsel (“OPC” or “Citizens”), the Florida Industrial Power Users Group (“FIPUG”), the Florida Retail Federation (“FRF”), the Federal Executive Agencies (“FEA”), and the WCF Hospital Utility Alliance (“HUA”). Collectively, Tampa Electric, OPC, FIPUG, FRF, FEA, and HUA shall be referred to herein as the “Parties” and the term “Party” shall be the singular form of the term “Parties.” OPC, FIPUG, FRF, FEA, and HUA will be referred to herein as the “Consumer Parties.” This document shall be referred to as the “2017 Agreement.”
EXHIBIT AStipulation and Settlement Agreement • October 22nd, 2014 • New York
This Stipulation and Settlement Agreement, including all associated exhibits or attachments (“Stipulation”), is made for the sole purpose of settling the above-captioned action on a collective and class-wide basis. This Stipulation and the settlement it evidences is made in compromise of disputed claims. The Parties enter into this Stipulation on a conditional basis. In the event that the Court does not enter the Order Granting Final Approval of Settlement, or in the event that the associated Judgment does not become a Final Judgment for any reason, this Stipulation (except for those provisions relating to non-admissibility and non-admission of liability set forth in Sections I, IV, 2.12.4, and 2.12.5 and those provisions relating to the return of documents and discovery set forth in Sections 2.13.1 and 2.13.2) shall be deemed null and void ab initio, shall be of no force or effect whatsoever, and shall not be referred to or utilized for
STIPULATION AND SETTLEMENT AGREEMENTStipulation and Settlement Agreement • August 24th, 2022
Pursuant to Rule 207(a)(5) of the Rules of Practice and Procedure of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (“Commission” or “FERC”), 18 C.F.R. § 385.207(a)(5), Northwest Pipeline LLC (“Northwest”) respectfully submits for the approval of the Commission this Stipulation and Settlement Agreement (“Settlement”) to, among other things, modify the transportation rates set forth in Northwest’s FERC Gas Tariff, Fifth Revised Volume No. 1 (“Tariff”), pursuant to the terms below. Northwest and the other Settling Parties (as defined in Article II) stipulate and agree to the following:
STIPULATION AND SETTLEMENT AGREEMENTStipulation and Settlement Agreement • September 7th, 2018
Community Utilities of Indiana, Inc. (“CUII”) and the Indiana Office of Utility Consumer Counselor (“OUCC”) (collectively the “Settling Parties” and individually “Settling Party”) solely for purposes of compromise and settlement and to reduce controversy and avoid protracted litigation and having been duly advised by their respective staff, experts and counsel, stipulate and agree that the terms and conditions set forth below represent a fair, just and reasonable resolution of all matters pending before the Commission in this Cause, subject to their incorporation by the Indiana Utility Regulatory Commission (“Commission”) into a final, non- appealable order (“Final Order”) without modification or further condition that may be unacceptable to any Settling Party. If the Commission does not approve this Stipulation and Settlement Agreement (“Settlement Agreement”), in its entirety, the entire Settlement Agreement shall be null and void and deemed withdrawn, unless otherwise agreed to in w
BEFORE THE PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION OF UTAHStipulation and Settlement Agreement • November 8th, 2017
In the Matter of the Petition of BLUE JAY WIRELESS, LLC for Designation as an Eligible Telecommunications Carrier in the State of Utah ))))))) Docket No. 12-2559-01
STIPULATION AND AGREEMENT OF SETTLEMENTStipulation and Settlement Agreement • May 10th, 2005 • Dynegy Inc /Il/ • Crude petroleum & natural gas
This stipulation and settlement agreement (this “Stipulation”), dated April 29, 2005, is entered into by and among plaintiffs Kevin Bosse and Alan Gillies, derivatively on behalf of Dynegy Inc. (collectively, “Plaintiffs”), nominal defendant Dynegy Inc. (“Dynegy”), and defendants Charles L. Watson, Stephen W. Bergstrom, Robert D. Doty, Sheli Z. Rosenberg, Charles E. Bayless, Joe J. Stewart, Richard H. Matzke, George L. Kirkland, Darald W. Callahan, Glenn F. Tilton, John S. Watson, H. John Riley, J. Otis Winters, Daniel L. Dienstbier, Michael D. Capellas, Patricia M. Eckert, and Jerry L. Johnson (collectively, the “Individual Defendants”). All parties to this Stipulation shall be collectively referred to as the “Parties.” The Parties have reached an agreement to settle the shareholder derivative litigation styled In re Dynegy Inc. Derivative Litigation, Lead Case No. 2002-25250, pending in the 164th District Court for Harris County, Texas (the “Derivative Litigation”) on the terms and c
STIPULATION AND SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT RESOLVING PROOF OF CLAIM NO. 3617 AND RELATED MOTIONStipulation and Settlement Agreement • January 17th, 2019
Canadian Anti-Trust Class Representatives (as defined below and together with the Trust, the “Parties”), both individually and on behalf of the Settlement Class, as more particularly
BEFORE THE FLORIDA PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSIONStipulation and Settlement Agreement • August 11th, 2021 • Tampa Electric Co • Electric services • Florida
THIS AGREEMENT is dated this 6th day of August, 2021, and is by and between Tampa Electric Company (“Tampa Electric” or the “company”), the Office of Public Counsel (“OPC” or “Citizens”), the Florida Industrial Power Users Group (“FIPUG”), the Florida Retail Federation (“FRF”), the Federal Executive Agencies (“FEA”), Walmart Inc. (“Walmart”), and the West Central Florida Hospital Utility Alliance (“HUA”). Collectively, Tampa Electric, OPC, FIPUG, FRF, FEA, Walmart, and HUA shall be referred to herein as the “Parties” and the term “Party” shall be the singular form of the term “Parties.” OPC, FIPUG, FRF, FEA, Walmart, and HUA will be referred to herein as the “Consumer Parties.” This agreement, including Exhibits appended hereto, shall be referred to as the “2021 Agreement.”
BEFORE THE PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION OF UTAHStipulation and Settlement Agreement • June 11th, 2013
In the Matter of the Application of Nexus ) Communications, Inc. for Designation as an ) Eligible Telecommunications Carrier for Low ) Income Support Only )
RE: Docket 4373 – Interstate Navigation Company FYE May 31, 2021 Earnings Report Settlement AgreementStipulation and Settlement Agreement • September 12th, 2022
On behalf of the Division of Public Utilities and Carriers (“Division”), please accept for filing the attached Settlement Agreement between the Division and Interstate Navigation Company (“Interstate”). The attached agreement is the result of good faith, considered negotiation between the parties.
BEFORE THE PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION OF UTAHStipulation and Settlement Agreement • December 13th, 2016
In the Matter of the Petition of Global Connection Inc. of America dba STAND UP WIRELESS for Designation as an Eligible Telecommunications Carrier in the State of Utah ))))))) Docket No. 13-2432-01
ContractStipulation and Settlement Agreement • July 1st, 2016
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORKStipulation and Settlement Agreement • November 6th, 2019
STIPULATION AND SETTLEMENT AGREEMENTStipulation and Settlement Agreement • October 30th, 2020
STIPULATION AND SETTLEMENT AGREEMENTStipulation and Settlement Agreement • January 19th, 2022
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and among Plaintiff Annie Arnold (“Plaintiff”), additional class representatives Bobby Abney, Tina Daniel, and Kenneth Scruggs (“Additional Class Representatives”), individually and on behalf of themselves and the Class as defined herein, and Defendant State Farm Fire and Casualty Company (“State Farm” or “Defendant”), that, in consideration of the promises and covenants set forth in this Stipulation and Settlement Agreement (“Agreement”) and, upon entry by the Court of an order of Final Judgment in the lawsuit captioned Arnold v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Co., Case No. 2:17-CV-148- TFM-C (“Action”), the matters raised by, or which could have been raised by, Plaintiff and/or Additional Class Representatives in the Action against Defendant are settled, compromised, and dismissed on the merits and with prejudice on the terms and conditions set forth in this Agreement.
