Subsequent Negotiations Sample Clauses
The "Subsequent Negotiations" clause defines how parties will handle further discussions or modifications to an agreement after it has been executed. Typically, this clause outlines the process for initiating additional negotiations, such as requiring written notice or specifying which topics may be revisited. For example, it may state that any changes to pricing or delivery terms must be formally negotiated and documented. The core function of this clause is to provide a clear framework for amending the agreement, ensuring that any future changes are managed in an orderly and mutually agreed-upon manner.
POPULAR SAMPLE Copied 2 times
Subsequent Negotiations. The date, time, place and other conditions for 44 negotiating sessions shall be established by mutual agreement between the parties.
Subsequent Negotiations. If either party desires to modify or amend this 20 Agreement, it shall give written notice of such intent to the other party. Such notice shall be by 21 certified mail with return receipt requested. 22
Subsequent Negotiations. If either party desires to modify or amend this Agreement, it shall give written notice of such intent no earlier than one hundred twenty (120) calendar days prior to the expiration date, and no later than ninety (90) calendar days prior to the expiration date of this Agreement. Such notice shall be by regular mail or email.
Subsequent Negotiations. If either party desires to modify or amend this Agreement, it shall give written notice of such intent no earlier than one hundred twenty (120) calendar days prior to the expiration date, and no later than ninety (90) calendar days prior to the expiration date of this Agreement. Such notice shall be by certified mail with return receipt requested. The parties agree that the negotiations for a successor agreement will be conducted in accordance with the dispute settlement procedure set forth in the Ohio Revised Code Chapter 4117, unless the parties mutually agree to vary said procedure during negotiations for a successor agreement. I
Subsequent Negotiations. In the event Buyer and Seller determine or reach agreement on the smelting and refining charges for the Part A Tonnage in accordance with Section 9.1(i) as a result of negotiations, as a result of the acceptance of the smelting and refining charges contained in a third party offer(s) or with the referee resolving the differences between two (2) third party offers or sets of offers, then on or before March 31, 2003 and on or before March 31 of each fifth year thereafter, Buyer and Seller shall comply with the procedures set forth in Section 9.1 (i) including but not limited to the obligations associated with the right of each party to submit a third party offer(s) in order to determine the smelting and refining charges which will be applicable to the Part A Tonnage for the five (5) Contract Years commencing on January 1, 2004 with respect to the first such settlement under this Section 9.1(ii), and with the same timing to apply to each subsequent five (5) Contract Years, mutatis mutandis. If as a result of the compliance by Buyer and Seller with the procedures provided for in the immediately preceding paragraph of this Section 9.1(ii): (i) Buyer and Seller mutually agree on the smelting and refining charges which shall be applicable for the ensuing five (5) Contract Years, (ii) Buyer or Seller agrees to the smelting and refining charges for such period contained in a third party offer(s) submitted to it by the other party hereto, or (iii) the referee resolves the differences between two (2) offers or sets of offers, all in the manner provided in Section 9.1(i), then upon the occurrence of any of such events the smelting and refining charges as so determined shall be applicable to all Part A Tonnage for the ensuing five
Subsequent Negotiations. 1. The Parties shall commence negotiations on a new Canada-United Kingdom free trade agreement no later than one year after the date of entry into force of this Agreement.
2. A Party shall give positive consideration to any proposal by the other Party regarding topics to be included in the scope of the negotiations referred to in paragraph 1, including topics not covered by this Agreement.
3. In pursuing the negotiations referred to in paragraph 1, the Parties shall endeavour to develop their trade and economic relations further by aiming for an agreement that is ambitious, modern and comprehensive, and that is tailored to their interests.
4. The Parties shall strive to conclude the negotiations referred to in paragraph 1 within three years of the date of entry into force of this Agreement.
Subsequent Negotiations. In the event negotiations continue beyond August 15, 2026, the terms and conditions of this Agreement shall remain in effect until a new Agreement is reached and signed. There shall be no salary increases until a new Agreement is reached and signed.
Subsequent Negotiations. 1. The Parties shall commence negotiations on a new Canada-United Kingdom free trade agreement no later than one year after the date of entry into force of this Agreement.
2. A Party shall give positive consideration to any proposal by the other Party regarding topics to be included in the scope of the negotiations referred to in paragraph 1, including topics not covered by this Agreement.
3. In pursuing the negotiations referred to in paragraph 1, the Parties shall endeavour to develop their trade and economic relations further by aiming for an agreement that is ambitious, modern and comprehensive, and that is tailored to their interests.
4. The Parties shall strive to conclude the negotiations referred to in paragraph 1 within three years of the date of entry into force of this Agreement.
1. Incorporated Articles 8.18 (Scope) through 8.43 (Consolidation), as well as incorporated paragraphs 8.44.2 and 8.44.3 (Committee on Services and Investment), except for sub-paragraph (d), shall not apply upon entry into force of this Agreement.
2. Within 90 days of the entry into force of this Agreement, the Parties shall commence a comprehensive review of the incorporated provisions listed in paragraph 1.
3. The review under paragraph 2 shall be completed within three years of the entry into force of this Agreement. No later than 30 months after the entry into force of this Agreement, the Parties shall consult as to whether the three-year period should be extended. If they agree, the period may be extended by decision of the Canada- UK Joint Committee.
4. If the review under paragraph 2 has not been completed within the time period set out in paragraph 3 or as extended by the Canada-UK Joint Committee, the incorporated provisions listed in paragraph 1 shall apply, provided that the equivalent provisions of CETA have entered into force.
5. For greater certainty, following the Parties’ review under paragraph 2, the amendment procedures established in incorporated paragraph 30.2.1 (Amendments) apply.
6. Incorporated paragraph 13.2.4 (Scope), incorporated sub-paragraph 13.18.3(c) (Financial Services Committee), incorporated Article 13.21 (Investment disputes in financial services) as well as incorporated Annex 13-B (Understanding on the Application of Articles 13.16.1 and 13.21), to the extent that it relates to the process under incorporated Article 13.21, shall not apply unless and until the incorporated provisions referred to in paragraph 1 apply.
7. Further to Artic...
Subsequent Negotiations. 15.1 The parties shall pursue further negotiations with a view to including in this Agreement supply and services contracts of organizations referred to in Article 1.2 of Appendix C, subject to any special provisions that may be required.
15.2. The negotiations shall be conducted on the basis of reciprocal and progressive inclusion of categories o f procurements and organizations, in accordance with an agreed timetable, and in consultation with th e appropriate organizations.
15.3. The parties undertake to use their best efforts to achieve full coverage of supply and services contracts of organizations referred to in paragraph 15.1 within two years of the date of signature of this Agreement. The Ministers shall meet regularly, and at least every six months, to review the progress of the negotiations. The Premiers have signed this Agreement on behalf on their respective Governments, in Toronto on the 3 rd day of May, 1994. Honourable ▇▇▇ ▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ Premier of Ontario Premier Ministre du Québec
1.1 Subject to the exclusions of paragraph 1.2 below, this Agreement applies to supply contracts o f $25,000 or more concluded by the following organizations: Ministries and organizations under Schedule I and Schedule IV of the Management Board of Cabinet Directives. Ministries and organizations covered by the "Regulation respecting supply contracts of Government departments and public bodies".
1.2 This Agreement does not apply to the following procurements:
i) purchase of goods related to cultural or artistic fields as well as computer software fo r educational purposes, and subscriptions;
ii) agriculture products under supply management or regulated by provincial marketing boards;
iii) purchase, lease or rental of goods related to information technology until January 1, 1996.
1.1 Subject to the exclusions of paragraph 1.2 below, this Agreement applies to services contracts o f $200,000 or more concluded by the following organizations: Ministries and organizations under Schedule I and Schedule IV of the Management Board of Cabinet Directives. Ministries and organizations covered by the "Regulation respecting services contracts of Government departments and public bodies".
1.2 This Agreement does not apply to the following procurements:
i. services that in the province issuing the tender can, by legislation or regulation, be provided only by the following licensed professionals: medical doctors, dentists, nurses, pharmacists , veterinarians, engineers, land su...
Subsequent Negotiations. In early 2000, there was a leadership convention which resulted in ▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ becoming Premier, and which in the interim prevented the Public Service Employee Relations Commission from having a mandate to negotiate. Subsequently, the Government indicated that it would only discuss wage increases if the Association took all other issues off the table. The Association refused; its members engaged in a work stoppage on February 15 and 16, 2000, and it planned a further four-day work stoppage starting on Monday, March 27, 2000. On March 17 and 21, 2000, there were meetings between the Association and the Public Service Employee Relations Commission, at which the parties discussed the judges’ compensation model, what ▇▇. ▇▇▇▇ had said about it, the Court of Appeal’s decision overturning the Legislature’s rejection of the recommendations of the commission about provincial court judges’ salaries, and the Association’s wish for there to be a more effective remedy for an improper rejection of recommendations by the Government than merely sending it back to the Government for reconsideration. On March 23, 2000, the parties engaged the services of ▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇, a very experienced mediator, to help the parties deal especially with the recognition and renewal process issues. In the course of this mediation, the Association learned that the Government had made an application to the Supreme Court of British Columbia to be heard the next day for an injunction to prevent the work stoppage scheduled for the following week. Late on March 23, 2000, the majority of the Association’s Board of Directors decided to recommend to its members that they defer the study sessions, and vote on the Government’s proposed modifications to ▇▇▇▇’▇ recommendations: • Amendment to the Crown Counsel Act to recognize the Association as bargaining agent. • Acceptance of ▇▇▇▇’▇ recommendations as the process to be used for long-run negotiations with the proviso that the applicable Minister be the Minister responsible for the Public Service Employee Relations Commission. • Agreement to use ▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇ to make non-binding recommendations to settle the immediate negotiations for the 1998 Agreement. • If the Government rejected ▇▇▇▇▇▇’▇ recommendations, then the Association could terminate the process, in which case the Government would be free to repeal the amendments to the Crown Counsel Act. The Association’s membership rejected the Government’s proposal in a vote taken on the morning of Friday,...
