Resiliency Sample Clauses

Resiliency. During the term of the Agreement and all Orders and Statements of Work under the Agreement, Provider shall maintain a high availability (“HA”) solution and related plan that is consistent with Industry Standards for the Provider Services being provided. The HA solution is required to have a highly available technical architecture across all the application tiers (e.g., Web, application, database, etc.) with nodes deployed across different physical data centers (e.g., across AWS Availability Zones) with no more than one (1) hour of recovery time and data loss. If an HA solution is not able to be deployed, Provider shall maintain a disaster recovery (“DR”) solution and related plan that is consistent with Industry Standards for the Provider Services being provided. The DR solution will ensure identified critical capabilities are restored within a twenty-four (24)-hour period with no more than twelve (12) hours of data loss in the event of a declared disaster or major system outage. Provider will test the HA or DR solution and related plan at least twice annually or more frequently if test results indicate that critical systems were not capable of being recovered within the periods above. Provider will provide summary test results for each exercise which will include the actual recovery point (how much data lost, if any) and recovery times (time to bring back applications and/or the Provider Services, if not automated failover) achieved within the exercise. Provider will provide agreed upon action plans to promptly address and resolve any deficiencies, concerns, or issues that may prevent the critical functionality of the application and/or Provider Services from being recovered within twenty-four (24) hours in the event of a disaster or major system outage. Further, Provider will notify Accenture, in a timely manner, when Provider initiates Provider’s business continuity plan.

Resiliency. GitLab will architect and maintain an underlying cloud infrastructure with commercially reasonable resiliency for all data, compute, and network services. At a minimum, GitLab will maintain the highest documented level of “GitLab Reference Architecture” as detailed on GitLab’s Website.

Resiliency. Projects analyzed and awarded points based on whether the project improves or addresses an identified resiliency issue on a vulnerable corridor.

Resiliency. Multi Availability Zones are enabled on AWS and Company conducts Backup Restoration Testing on regular basis to ensure resiliency.

Resiliency. IPEF economies have already begun to recognize the positive contribution of coordinated actions to mitigate and prevent future supply chain disruptions and secure critical sectors and key products. Work towards guiding principles, together with complementary and joint actions, could mitigate risks and advance the resilience of U.S./Indo-Pacific supply chains, while confirming our commitment to avoid unnecessary barriers to trade that negatively affect U.S. production or export opportunities. Chemicals play a critical role in supply chains for many goods including semiconductors, power and telecommunication infrastructure, solar panels, rare earth magnets, and critical minerals. A secure and resilient supply of critical minerals is essential for the production of these goods. Other chemistries are also used in the manufacturing process that require expanded capacity to support continued growth. Such chemistries include, but are not limited to, P-Series Glycol Ethers, E-Series Glycol Ethers, Amines, and Oxo Solvents. These products are sold into several markets. Their availability, however, is often constrained because of strong demand and limited production, creating supply chain chokepoints. The IPEF could help to address such challenges. As a start, we would encourage IPEF discussions to establish the following incentives as guiding principles and actions to produce chemistries crucial to the R&D and manufacturing of goods crucial to supply chains: • Abundant sources of natural gas and natural gas liquids, the primary feedstocks and energy sources for manufacturing chemicals; • Timely review and approval of new chemistries by IPEF regulatory agencies; • Low cost imported intermediate inputs for chemicals production; • Facilitation of high skilled labor; • Access to worker training/retraining programs and strengthening of worker skills and safety knowledge; • Strong protection of intellectual property rights, including trade secrets; • Public-private partnerships for research and development of new low carbon, circular materials and technologies; and • High standard protections for human health, safety, and the environment, including, where possible, increased transparency on product composition while protecting confidential trade secrets. We would also encourage negotiations in this pillar to establish principles for each IPEF economy to work closely with regulatory and other agencies in their respective administrations to ensure that these incentives are...

Resiliency. A key element for supporting youth at-risk. The Clearing House, 73(2), 121-123. Lake, S.E. Esq. (Ed.). (2000) Alternative schools: Legal guidance for serving special education students. ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, PA: LRP Publications. ▇▇▇▇▇, ▇. (1998). Characteristics of alternative schools and programs serving at-risk students. The High School Journal, 81 (4), 183-197. ▇▇▇▇▇, C., & ▇▇▇▇, C. (1997). At-risk students in second chance programs (Research Report No. 20). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota, Enrollment Options for Students with Disabilities Project. ▇▇▇▇▇, C., & ▇▇▇▇, C. (1999a). At-risk students attending second chance programs: Measuring performance in desired outcome domains. Journal of Education for Students Placed At Risk, 4 (2), 173-192. ▇▇▇▇▇, C., & ▇▇▇▇, C. (1999b). At-risk students in second chance programs: Reasons for transfer and continued attendance (Research Report No. 21). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Enrollment Options for Students with Disabilities Project. ▇▇▇▇▇, C, & ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, S. (1995). Characteristics of alternative schools and programs serving at-risk students (Research Report No. 16). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Enrollment Options for Students with Disabilities Project. ▇▇▇▇, ▇. (1999). Students with and without disabilities attending alternative programs: Reasons for dropping out of an returning to school (Research Report No. 30). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota, Enrollment Options for Students with Disabilities Project. ▇▇▇▇, ▇., & ▇▇▇▇▇, ▇. (2000). Students at risk attending high schools and alternative schools: Goals, barriers and accommodations. The Journal of At-Risk Issues, 6 (2), 11-21. ▇▇▇▇▇, ▇.▇., & ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, ▇. (1999). Alternative education: From a “last chance” to a proactive model. The Clearing House, 73 (2), 86-88. ▇▇▇▇▇▇, ▇. (1992, April). Secondary school students classified as seriously emotionally disturbed: How are they being served?. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association 1997 Annual Meeting, San Francisco, CA. ▇▇▇, ▇. ▇., & ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, ▇.▇. (1998). Academic persistence and alternative high schools: Student and site characteristics. The High School Journal, 81 (4), 199-208. ▇▇▇▇▇▇, ▇. (1991). Alternative education (▇▇▇▇ Document Reproduction Service No. ED 349 652). Clemson, SC: National Dropout Prevention Center. National Center for Education Statistics (2000). Dropout rates in the United States: 1999 (NCES 2001-022). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Educ...

Resiliency. Changing climatic and sea level conditions may alter the Bay ecosystem and human activities, requiring adjustment to policies, programs and projects to successfully achieve our restoration and protection goals for the Chesapeake Bay and its watershed. This challenge requires careful monitoring and assessment of these impacts and application of this knowledge to policies, programs and projects.

Resiliency. Another set of test cases will focus on the resiliency of the EFSP to handle errors coming from ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇.▇▇▇, unexpected ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇.▇▇▇ outages as well as scheduled ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇.▇▇▇ maintenance windows and outages. A final test case will ensure that the EFSP has implemented an appropriate virus scanning solution to ensure that no infected documents make it to ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇.▇▇▇. EFSPs must exercise each of the use cases designated for EFSPs during certification and account for every possible failure outcome. This includes providing validation logic to prevent all preventable failures, as well as error handling for both non-preventable failures (user error) and preventable failures (in the event that the EFSP’s prevention measures fail).

Resiliency. INCIDENT RESPONSE, BCP, AND DR