Recommended Actions Clause Samples
The "Recommended Actions" clause outlines specific steps or measures that parties are advised to take in certain situations covered by the agreement. Typically, this clause provides guidance on best practices or procedures to follow, such as reporting issues, implementing safety protocols, or conducting regular reviews. Its core practical function is to promote proactive behavior and minimize risks by encouraging parties to act in ways that support compliance and effective problem resolution.
Recommended Actions. The recommendations in this plan fall into two categories: recommendations for actions that need to be taken throughout the Cross River Gorillas’ range, and site-specific recommendations. Note: Several organizations, governmental and non-governmental, have already committed to work in partnership for the implementation of the proposed actions.
Recommended Actions. All stakeholders in the university research enterprise can work to bring expectations of patent licensing yields (fee and royalty) in line with global benchmarks. Within universities, incentives should be re-focused on core competencies related to (1) producing knowledge through research and; (2) more productive partnerships with industry to raise revenue from direct provision of technical services, consistent with the university’s core missions.
Recommended Actions. The Local Working Group recommends that:
1) The Idaho Office of Species Conservation fund a comprehensive study in the Greater Curlew Valley area that includes the impacts of predation on local sage-grouse populations.
Recommended Actions. The Local Working Group recommends that:
1) The federal and state land management agencies and the Natural Resources Conservation Service develop standardized methods for evaluating vegetative characteristics. The inventory method should be based on important sage-grouse habitat parameters and include those vegetative conditions that are determined by site potential and are necessary to sustain overall resource productivity. These parameters including but not limited to: predominant sagebrush species, average sagebrush height, sagebrush canopy, sagebrush age, predominant grass species, average grass height, grass canopy, forb canopy, patch size, and vegetative mosaic on the landscape. Once the agencies agree to standardized evaluation methods, documentation of the methodology will be appended to this plan
2) The land management agencies enhance current maps of vegetative characteristics in sage-grouse habitat, including presently lost areas, vital areas, underutilized areas, and fragmented habitat areas within the Greater Curlew Valley area. (Standardized inventory methods developed in Recommended Action 1.3 above will be used.) Those areas that are permanently lost and low-priority areas (see Habitat Action #1 “Habitat Inventories” above) and do not have the potential to provide suitable habitat may be excluded from this inventory.
Recommended Actions. The Local Working Group recommends that:
1) All land management agencies evaluate the location, timing, intensity, and overall impact of grazing by domestic livestock and wildlife upon sage-grouse habitat use areas identified during agency planning efforts.
2) Where current documented ungulate use is a factor in not meeting sage-grouse habitat requirements, initiate changes that will result in improving habitat conditions.
3) During the development and review of grazing plans (including grazing systems and objectives) proposed range projects (e.g. fences, pipelines, etc.) are designed to consider seasonal sage-grouse habitat needs and the needs of sustainable sagebrush ecosystems.
4) Incentives are developed to encourage private landowners to work with the Natural Resources Conservation Service, the Idaho Department of Agriculture, and the Extension Service to manage grazing in a manner that provides good sage-grouse habitat on private land.
5) All land management agencies monitor grazing use levels and ecological trends on a regular cycle to ensure that sage-grouse habitat requirements and sagebrush ecological sustainability are achieved on at least 50% of federal land in the GCVA.
6) All federal and state land managers implement suitable habitat restoration practices for sagebrush ecosystems that have deteriorated to such an extent that livestock management alone will not restore an upward habitat trend.
7) All land management agencies, in conjunction with IDF&G, inform livestock operators of lek locations and encourage operators to avoid leks during breeding season (mid-March through mid-to-late-May) when trailing, bedding, salting, or watering livestock.
8) All land management agencies route new fences in a manner that minimizes negative impacts to sage-grouse. Where excessive fence mortality has been documented, consider rerouting or modifying existing fences.
9) All federal and state land managers increase the visibility of fences and other structures occurring within one kilometer of seasonal ranges by flagging or similar means if these structures have been documented as hazardous to flying grouse (e.g., birds have been observed hitting or grouse remains have been found next to these structures.
Recommended Actions. The Local Working Group recommends that:
1) The land management agencies and the Natural Resources Conservation Service develop agreement on a set of guidelines for prescribed burn proposals in sage- grouse habitat. The guidelines should address analysis, implementation, and monitoring for prescribed burning.
2) Prescribed fire not be used in sage-grouse habitats prone to invasion by cheat grass and other invasive weed species unless adequate measures are included in restoration plans to replace the cheat grass understory with perennial species using approved re- seeding strategies. These strategies could include, but are not limited to, use of pre- emergent herbicides (e.g., Oust®, Plateau®) to retard cheat grass germination until perennial herbaceous species become established.
3) In winter habitat, ▇▇▇▇▇ larger than 120 acres (50 hectares) should be discouraged unless other compelling reasons warrant larger areas. In those cases, the reasons should be thoroughly justified in the analysis. ▇▇▇▇▇ should not exceed 20% of winter habitat within any 20-30 year interval (depending on the estimated recovery time for the sagebrush habitat, especially ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇ sagebrush).
4) IDF&G, in cooperation with the other land management agencies, initiate a study of sage-grouse response to prescribed fire in ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇ sagebrush habitat areas on a landscape basis.
Recommended Actions. Staff recommends the approval of the listing agreement, as presented. THIS LISTING AGREEMENT is made and entered into on this the day of July, 2021, between City of Dunwoody, Georgia as owner of the real property described herein, (hereinafter referred to as "Seller"), and Colliers International - Atlanta, LLC. (hereinafter referred to as "Broker"). Seller desires to sell real property situated in Dekalb County, known as 4555 and ▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇, ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, an approximately 43,000 SF office building located on five acres of land, as more particularly described in Exhibit " A " attached hereto and by reference incorporated herein, including all buildings and improvements thereon and all fixtures and appurtenances, (all of the foregoing being collectively referred to hereinafter as the "Property"). Broker is licensed by the Georgia Real Estate Commission as a real estate broker and will act as the limited agent of Seller with respect to the negotiations for the sale of Property. Seller desires to engage the services of Broker to market and offer the Property for sale, and Broker desires to assist Seller in that connection, upon the terms, provisions and conditions contained hereinafter. FOR AND IN CONSIDERATION OF the premises set forth herein and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto agree as follows:
Recommended Actions. Both agencies will actively pursue public awareness programs through the following:
1. Public Education
a. School programs, ages K-12
b. Roadside sign program
c. Timely newspaper articles concerning fire awareness
d. Attendance at various local events which lend themselves to fire prevention displays.
2. Code Enforcement
a. Active PRC 4291 home inspection program in target areas.
b. Enforcement of the Fire Safe Ordinances as they apply to construction in watershed areas. CAL FIRE will take an advisory role with the CITY Fire Marshal within the areas of the AGREEMENT.
Recommended Actions. DocuSign Envelope ID: B56D90A6-CEA7-4E31-87C3-7F700E35E8B2 Purpose: To reduce the invasion of weeds into homeowner’s property and reduce the invasion of non-native plants into native open space areas. Also, to reduce dumping and other covenant restricted activities along the boundary. To help educate and notify homeowners about dumping and other covenant restricted activities along the boundary as well as clean up and restore areas where these activities have occurred.
Recommended Actions. The Local Working Group recommends that:
1) All land management agencies identify areas in fair or poor ecological condition and prioritize areas for implementation of restoration activities. All land management agencies restore degraded rangelands to a condition that again provides suitable breeding habitat for sage-grouse by including sagebrush, native forbs (especially legumes), and native grasses in re-seeding efforts (Apa 1998). If native forbs and grasses are unavailable, use species that are functional equivalents and provide habitat characteristics similar to those of native species.
2) All land management agencies consider the protocol developed in Habitat Action #3 “Management Strategies for Sustainable Sagebrush Grass Communities” of this document when implementing recovery/restoration projects.
3) All land management agencies follow the latest science for cheat grass control and sagebrush reestablishment in cheatgrass/noxious weed-prone sites.
4) All land management agencies utilize prescriptive grazing to achieve desired restoration objectives, (for example, crested wheatgrass seedings) if appropriate.
5) Undesirable plant species be aggressively controlled or eliminated through the application of chemical, mechanical, or biological control methods where appropriate.
6) All land management agencies require vegetation monitoring to be included in fire rehabilitation plans and immediately establish monitoring plots following all fires.
7) ll land management agencies promote rangeland practices that improve soil moisture effectiveness, reduce erosion, and increase abundance and diversity of forbs.
8) In areas of significant winter habitat loss (>40% of original winter habitat), all land managers7 manage all remaining sagebrush habitats conservatively to meet sage- grouse needs.
