PROTECTION FROM HARM. Detention Facility JCMSC shall provide Children in the Facility with reasonably safe conditions of confinement by fulfilling the requirements set out below.
PROTECTION FROM HARM. Abuse, Neglect, and Incident Management Each Facility shall protect individuals from harm consistent with current, generally accepted professional standards of care, as set forth below.
PROTECTION FROM HARM. LCJDC shall provide Youth in the Facility with reasonably safe conditions of confinement, by fulfilling the requirements set out below.
PROTECTION FROM HARM. Children conceived through surrogacy agreements can experience various forms of harm and exploitation if their rights are not considered. In the event of parents losing a legal claim, a child could experience psychological trauma if taken from the parents who had cared for him or her and given to the surrogate.48 The child’s right to be protected from harm would mean parties not making decisions that negatively affect his or her well-being and health. Medical screening for genetic diseases and counselling before implantation in the surrogate will protect the child from harm. There should also be a limit to the number of agreements in which surrogates can participate, as the higher the number of pregnancies and births achieved, the higher the risk to the children produced. Another form of preventable harm is the risk of sexual, physical or emotional abuse by the partner of a single parent who has a child through a surrogate mother when that partner is not the biological parent of the child.49
PROTECTION FROM HARM. 40. The State shall, at all times, provide youth in the Facilities with reasonably safe living conditions as follows:
PROTECTION FROM HARM. 1. The County shall ensure that inmates and trustees are supervised in the pods and the food service area with appropriate and adequate staffing levels.
PROTECTION FROM HARM. 64. By six months from the Effective Date hereof, CVH shall provide the individuals it serves with a safe and humane environment and seek to minimize the risk of harm.
PROTECTION FROM HARM. In so far as the regulation of content is concerned, it is clear that a prime objective of content regulation is the avoidance of harm. We argue that the objective is based on communications technologies’ ability to influence, harm and offend individuals. Thus, our second guiding principle is seen in terms of protection of consumers from financial (economic), physical, and psycho- logical harm. Indeed, since the advent of the Internet and the development of new communication technologies, we observe that the discourse on content regulation has shifted mostly towards the protection of children from illegal and harmful content made easily accessible over the Internet via mobile handheld devices. So, we remark that a measure worth pursuing is the estab- lishment of an independent organisation (similar to Australia’s ACMA) to monitor and regulate content delivered using new technologies including content delivered via mobile phones.
PROTECTION FROM HARM. 48. The State shall ensure that Ft. Bayard residents are adequately protected from harm.
PROTECTION FROM HARM. Consistent with constitutional standards, Maple Lawn shall provide individuals with a safe and secure environment and ensure that they are protected from harm.
