Peer Reviews. Additional Peer Reviews may be conducted as required by Applicable Code Requirements, Authorities Having Jurisdiction, and/or Judicial Council. Judicial Council shall be responsible for the costs of any additional peer reviews. Judicial Council, in collaboration with the Design Build Entity, shall use its best efforts to schedule the timing of these reviews within the parameters of the Contract Schedule.
Peer Reviews. The following Peer Review(s) shall be performed by Peer Reviewer(s). Judicial Council Representative will direct Design Build Entity on how to coordinate with each Peer Reviewer consistent with the requirements of the General Conditions. Meetings may also be required of Design Build Entity with Peer Reviewers. Design Build Entity will incorporate revisions requested by Peer Reviewers, unless otherwise directed by the Judicial Council in writing. Design Build Entity will coordinate with Judicial Council Representative prior to incorporating such revisions. 13.10.12.1. Structural Peer Review;
Peer Reviews. 1. Following advance notice of at least three months, each Party shall permit officials or experts designated by the other Party to conduct peer reviews in its territory to verify that the relevant control authorities and control bodies are carrying out the controls required under this Agreement.
Peer Reviews. 1. A Hearing Officer may submit a draft appeal determination to one (1) Hearing Officer “peer” reviewer for pre-issuance review, or to more reviewers at the discretion of the Hearing Officer.
Peer Reviews. The peer review is designed to have an outside team meet with the host agency (DDOT) to discuss and review its management processes/practices in a particular program area. Information on the host agency and team members’ policies and procedures are exchanged with the intent to improve the overall program process. The information gathered from the exchange is presented to agency management for process improvement.
Peer Reviews. All contract actions above the sim- plified acquisition threshold shall be independently reviewed by at least one other qualified contracting profes- sional. This includes solicitations, con- tracts, contract modifications, and de- livery/task orders. This requirement is waived for overseas posts and RPSOs that have only one qualified con- tracting professional.
Peer Reviews. ▪ Deliverable 1.x ▪ Deliverable 2.x ▪ Deliverable 7.x ▪ Deliverable 9.x
Peer Reviews. All the actions (including RTD projects, accompanying measures, thematic networks, working groups, etc.) established within the IAF area of Key Action III will in principle undergo one peer Review in each calendar year. As a general rule, no Reviews will be held in the first 10 months of implementation of the action. Section 2 of Annex III sets out the provisions governing the technical verification procedure in RTD, demonstration and combined projects.
Peer Reviews. Olsson Associates has elected to use peer reviews to provide the necessary quality control for project design documents. A peer review has several distinguishing characteristics: • Is always conducted by persons who are independent of the review subject. The reviewers should be sufficiently removed from the subject so they will not be biased by what has taken place to date on the project. • Has a specified purpose, scope, format, and duration. Such characteristics help to distinguish a peer review from other reviews that may be performed on a less systematic basis. • Is not an indication that the original design professional is incompetent or suspect in any way. Such a high-level review is merely a recognition that all design professionals and entire design organizations have had less than complete experience, and an independent team of peers can offer a new range of experiences and opinions. • Must be documented, and this documentation must then become a part of the permanent record of the project. • Will include the review of drawings and specifications by a second Professional Engineer/Landscape Architect/etc. in the case when a design requires the stamp or seal of that professional. EXHIBIT B - MAN-HOUR ESTIMATE - Xxxxxxx Road - Indian Creek Bridge to College Blvd - Overland Park Task No. Description of Work Items / Tasks Sen Proj Manager Sen Eng Sen Proj Eng Proj Eng Assoc Eng Assis Eng SrTech Tech Design Assoc. Assist. Tech Scientist Surveyor Asso Surv Sen Surv Admin Coord Driller LA Assoc. LA Assist. LA Const. Manager Lead Insp Ass Insp Total Man-hours Total Labor Fee Overhead #REF! Total (A+B) Profit #REF! Total Fee Total Fee 1 Survey and Geotechnical Investigation 1.01 Topographic Survey 4 52 52 6 114 $10,100 $10,100 $10,100.00 1.02 Office Survey Services 20 2 22 $1,696 $1,696 $1,696.00 Research KDOT ROW boundaries at College 2 2 4 $626 $626 $626.00 Staking construction items for utility coordination 6 6 12 $924 $924 $924.00 1.03 Geotechnical investigation 6 24 2 10 42 $5,040 $5,040 $5,040.00 1.04 QAQC 4 6 10 $1,332 $1,332 $1,332.00 1 SUBTOTAL 6 10 24 52 78 16 8 10 204 $19,718.00 2 Preliminary Design
