Monitoring Protocols. 24x7x365 Monitoring and proactive notifications to the Company’s Network and Development team • TCP Port Scanning • Ping • HTTP GET
Monitoring Protocols. Provide photo monitoring in the Annual Report that can clearly document changesover time and/or management activities. The Permittee will do the following as part of photo point monitoring:
Monitoring Protocols. Monitoring involves the presence of an on-site archaeologist to observe construction activities in areas where archaeological or historic resources may inadvertently be discovered. Monitoring for unknown but suspected historic properties or monitoring when Project activities are in close proximity to a known historic property may be necessary during Project activities, especially those involving ground disturbance. The most common situations in which monitoring may be required are: • when unforeseen project design changes and subsequent construction activities occur in areas where identification efforts have not occurred, • where the proposed activity must occur within the boundaries of a known archaeological or historic site that has not been fully delineated or evaluated, • or the activity occurs in an area that has high potential for archaeological, cultural, or human remains. Depending on the specific instance, monitoring may also involve the presence of one or more Tribal Advisors. The USACE and PLP will determine the number of Tribal Advisors that may participate in a given monitoring activity on a case-by-case basis, and will consider factors such as safety, logistics, and the nature and location of the proposed monitoring activity. To track progress, monitoring schedules will be managed as follows. Thirty days prior to initiating a monitoring event, PLP will provide the USACE with a memo informing the USACE of the planned activity, its location(s), expected number of monitoring archaeologist(s) and Tribal Advisor(s), and expected completion date. USACE will consult with Tribes to request that they identify tribal advisors to assist in monitoring activities. Interested Tribes will forward the names of proposed Tribal Advisors to the USACE commensurate with PLP’s staffing needs. If the number of proposed advisors exceeds the need for or the number of advisors that can safely accommodated, the USACE may consider a first-come-first served approach to the selection of monitors, the proximity of the discovery to current communities, and landowner preferences in selecting a Tribal Advisor(s). The USACE will provide the PLP with the names and contact information of Tribal Advisors within fourteen calendar days from receipt of PLP’s notification. PLP will coordinate the participation of the Tribal Advisors and CRS to the field; both Tribal Advisors and the CRS will be required to undergo the relevant PLP on-site orientation requirements for PLP staff and ...
Monitoring Protocols. Monitoring provides the information needed for both learning and evaluation of management effectiveness. The value of monitoring in adaptive management is inherited from its contribution to decision-making. To make monitoring useful, choices of what ecological and socio- economic attributes to monitor and how to monitor them (frequency, extent, intensity, etc.), must be linked closely to the management situation, objectives and targets that motivate the monitoring in the first place, as well as practical limits on staff and funding. While monitoring the ecological sustainability has been an integral part of the development of the adaptive management approach, monitoring the effect of decision-making on social and economic sustainability is also an important part of the process to ensure that decisions can be successfully implemented. In the iterative phase of adaptive management, the elements in the set-up phase are folded into a recursive process of 1) decision-making, 2) follow-up monitoring, 3) assessment, 4) learning and feedback, and 5) institutional learning. Decision-making. The actual process of adaptive decision-making entails decisions at recurring points in time that reflect the current level of understanding and take into account future scenarios and consequences of decisions. Decision-making at each decision point considers management objectives, resource status, and knowledge about consequences of potential actions. Decisions are then implemented by means of management actions on the ground.
Monitoring Protocols. All maintenance of riparian fencing shall be monitored as follows: • A short description of fence maintenance activities will be included in the annual report.
Monitoring Protocols. In the event the fish screen is installed, repaired, replaced, and/or relocated, provide Photo Monitoring in the Annual SHA report that can clearly document changes over time and/or management activities. The Permittee will do the following as part of photo point monitoring:
Monitoring Protocols. Develop and document monitoring protocols for Sustainable Groundwater Management (SGM)-related monitoring data.
Monitoring Protocols. 1. Each of the accreditation or recognition systems for which a signatory is responsible shall be subject to comprehensive monitoring and report by representatives of the other signatories at intervals of not more than six years.
Monitoring Protocols. Herbicide, Fertilizer and Pesticide use shall be monitored as follows: • Log of herbicide, fertilizer and pesticide use activities carried out within the calendar year to be included in the annual report.
Monitoring Protocols. All flood repair shall be monitored as follows: • Photographs of the emergency site repairs and a detailed description of the repairs to be included in the annual report.
