Land Valuation Clause Examples

Land Valuation. The Company shall collect and analyze all fair market land sales and demolition sales that occurred during the three years prior to the revaluation date in order to develop a market data approach. Any analysis or methodology utilized shall directly correlate to this market study. The Company shall prepare a sample format to be approved by the Tax Assessor prior to the actual use in valuing the land component. The identification of market trends is important, and an analysis should be used to determine and document such trends. Analysis may include sales ratio studies, paired sales and the development of general, segmented, and stratified coefficients of deviation. Data shall be secured from all available sources, compiled, checked, and analyzed for the calculation of land values. Factors affecting the value of land such as location, shape, size, topography, access to roads, railroads, and easements, use, etc. shall be carefully considered. The Company, in consultation with the Tax Assessor, if necessary, shall modify the existing VCS’s and/or create neighborhood delineations/value control sectors (VCS’s) which reflect the division of homogenous neighborhoods. Conservation easements, common areas and wetlands are to be valued uniformly throughout the Township of West Orange. Right of ways and easements are to be noted on the property data file and considered in the valuation process. If applicable, Qualified Farmland is to be valued according to its land use at rates provided by the State of New Jersey and at its highest and best use without farmland qualifications. In such instances, two value estimates will be required. The Company shall identify, quantify, analyze, and value all abandoned Class II railroad properties located within the Township of West Orange in accordance with the applicable New Jersey Statutes. The Company shall consider all State of New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection or Federal Environmental Protection Agency Declarations of Environmental Restrictions, Hazard areas, Groundwater Classification Exemption areas and other environmental deed restrictions, all of which must be noted in the property data file. All land valuation calculations shall be recorded in the CAMA data files. All computations from the base rate to the final calculated value shall be shown in the CAMA data files. The Company shall prepare a land value schedule reflecting the final determined land rates. Said land value schedule shall include the site val...

Land Valuation. The subject land is valued by the Sales Comparison Approach. This approach employs the principal of substitution, whereby willing buyers would typically pay no more for a property than what could be found as a substitute property within a reasonable period of time. This approach compares sales or capitalized leases of vacant land relatively similar to the subject, or at least bracketing the subject, as superior or inferior, on a price per unit basis. Since there are no two properties alike, some adjustments or ranking of the comparable sales will be performed. Following is a summary of the comparable sales or capitalized leases used in developing a market value estimate for the subject property. 10137 1 Lots 11 and 12, Blk 38, ST 08/16 $188,700 10,000 $18.87/SF 10135 2 Lot 10, Blk 34, ST 10/16 $232,500 5,000 $46.50/SF 10750 3 M&M Brokerage Lse- Congress Way 01/18 $38,000* 2,000 $19.00/SF 10434 4 Tax Lot 5A, ▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇ – Congress Way 01/18 $25,600** 1,600 $16.00/SF ▇▇▇▇ ▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇; ATS 4, Tax ▇▇▇ ▇▇, ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ Cafe Lease 05/13 $110,000** 5,500 $20.00/SF Subject 05/18 Solve 5,400 Solve 18-032 / Skagway Fish Co. Land Lease Update Comparable 1 is the 2016 sale of a much larger property. This property was zoned BG and further from the main tourist core on State Street. Due to the distance from the core as well as the larger lot size, this would be ranked inferior to the subject on a price per square foot basis. Comparable 2 is the late 2016 sale of a 5,000 SF BH zoned lot just one lot west of Broadway on 2nd Ave. It was purchased by the adjacent property owner for expansion, etc. It is similar in size. It is superior in zoning and has less restrictive use parameters. There also may have been a premium paid by the adjacent property owner. It is ranked superior on a square foot basis. Comparable 3 is the capitalized lease of the estimated land portion of the M&M Tour Broker site located towards the cruise ship dock at the head of the sea walk. It is ranked slightly inferior since the site is limited to a specific use. It is in a more congested area and the more industrial petro marine lease is located directly behind it. It is ranked inferior on a unit basis. storage facility and is also considered inferior in that respect. It is considered due to its location and zoning. For ranking purposes on price /SF basis, it is considered inferior to the subject. purposes on price /SF basis, it is considered inferior primarily due to the age of the lease. 18-032 /...

Land Valuation. The most applicable approach to land valuation is the Direct Sales Comparison Approach. All of the comparables are in Skagway. These sales or capitalized leases were chosen based on comparable attributes such as zoning, size, location, and available utilities. A qualitative rating is developed to weigh market differences between the subjects and their comparables whereby, if a comparable attribute is superior to a subject, a minus rating of -1, -2, or -3 is given, depending on its severity. Conversely, if a comparable attribute is inferior to the subject, a plus rating of +1, +2, or +3 is given, depending on its severity, to weight this with other attributes towards the subject. The gradation of weighting 1 to 3 is used since all qualitative attributes are not, in the appraisers’ opinion, equally weighted within the market. 1 Portion ATS 4, Tax Lot 5A, Petro Lease 01/12 $24,000* 1,600 SF $15.00/SF Similar W zoning; near seawalk and harbor 2 Portion ATS 4, Tax Lot 5D, Stowaway 05/13 $110,000* 5,500 SF $20.00/SF Similar W zoning, adjacent seawalk and Congress Way 3 Lot 10, Block 21, Skagway Townsite 09/15 $65,000 5,000 SF $13.00/SF Zoned Light Industrial; vacant lot 4 S 331/3 Lots 11 and 12, Blk 39 12/13 $55,000** 3,330 SF $16.52/SF Zoned Light Industrial with older building 5 Lot 12, Block 60 01/15 $65,000** 5,168 SF $12.58/SF Zoned Light Industrial with house *Fee simple value considering 8% lease rate; **Land Allocation from improved sale. Comparable 1 is the fee simple value based on a capitalized 2012 lease. It is smaller in size and similar in zoning. It is similar to the subject’s location isolated from the major tourist traffic flow and more industrial in use. The smaller size and economies of scale would indicate that this comparable is superior in value based on size. It is ranked as superior Comparable 2 is the fee simple value based on a capitalized 2013 lease. It is similar in waterfront zoning and larger in size. It is superior in its location between Congress Way and the seawalk which accounts for substantial tourist traffic. It also was superior in utilities. It is ranked superior overall. Comparable 3 is the fee simple sale of a parcel of land zoned for light industrial use and surrounded by a combination of residential and commercial uses. It is slightly larger and superior in utilities. It is a very recent transaction, having occurred in late 2015. It is ranked similar after considering adjustments. Comparable 4 is the allocated land value...

Land Valuation. The Sales Comparison Approach is the most common technique for valuing vacant land. It is used to form an opinion of market value of the subject site as though vacant. To apply this method, sales of vacant land comparable to the subject property are gathered and analyzed. The sales prices are adjusted for dissimilarities identified between each of the comparables and the subject. Elements considered include property rights, legal encumbrances, financing terms, conditions of sale (motivation), market conditions (sale date), location, physical characteristics, availability of utilities, zoning, and the highest and best use. The adjusted prices are reduced to some common unit of comparison, such as price per square foot or price per acre. This information is then analyzed in order to derive a unit value applicable to the subject property. When applied to the subject land area, this results in an opinion of the market value of the vacant land. To form an opinion of the market value of the subject property, we have completed a survey of sales of land felt to be the most appropriate for use in this analysis. Emphasis was placed on researching sales of properties similar to the subject in use potential. The comparables were analyzed in terms of their price per square foot. After adjusting the unit prices to reflect the characteristics of the subject and the current market conditions, an opinion of the unit value was determined for the subject property. The following pages display the location, details, property characteristics, and a discussion of the comparability of each sale followed by an adjustment grid. File #07-377 LUBAWY & ASSOCIATES, INC.

Land Valuation. Rs ………………………… (Ac.- Decimal) VALUATION OF FLAT : Rs ………………………… (_ sq.ft. carpet area As per RERA) 4O% Electrical, P.H Sanitary Installation : Rs ………………………… and Others charges. Total : Rs ………………………… GST : Rs ………………………… Grand Total : Rs ………………………… (Rupees only) FLAT BOUNDED BY: North : South : East : West : Certified that the Vendor do not belong to scheduled caste or schedule tribe community. The Vendee(s) is/are not belonging to Scheduled Caste or Schedule Tribe Community. Further, certified that the land in question is not within the purview of consolidation proceeding ▇▇▇.▇▇ Orissa Consolidation Holding and Prevention of Fragmentation of Land Act, 1972. Further certified that the land in question is not a ceiling surplus land within the meaning of Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976 or the Orissa Land Reforms Act, 1965. Further certified that the land in question is not a species Endowment property owithin the meaning of Orissa Hindu Religious Endowment Act, 1951.

Land Valuation. Value of Whole Property Before Taking

Land Valuation. The subject land will be valued by the Sales Comparison Approach. This approach employs the principal of substitution; whereby, willing buyers would typically pay no more for a property than what could be found as a substitute property within a reasonable period of time. This approach compares sales of vacant land relatively similar to the subject, or at least bracketing the subject, as superior or inferior, on a price per unit basis. Since there are no two properties alike, some adjustments or ranking of the comparable sales will be performed. A 5% adjustment was performed based on observed value changes by the assessor for sales occurring prior to 2015. Following is a summary of the comparable sales used in developing a market value estimate for the subject property. TABLE 4.1 - COMPARABLE SALES AND CAPITALIZED LEASES TABLE 1 ▇▇▇ ▇▇, ▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇, ▇▇▇▇ 85- 2(9150) 10/15 $132,000* RC 77,101 $1.71/SF $1.80/SF 2 ▇▇▇ ▇▇, ▇▇▇ ▇,▇▇▇▇ 99-16 (7843) 08/13 $110,000 RC 42,223 $2.54/SF $2.67/SF 3 Confidential (8047) 07/14 I ~40,000 $2.12/SF $2.22/SF 4 Lot 1, Skagway Commercial SD (7907) 06/14 $1,500,000 I 653,400 $2.30/SF $2.41/SF Subject 03/18 Solve 56,969 Solve *Land Allocation Comparable 1 is the land allocation from the most recent transaction in the area the appraiser was able to analyze. It is slightly larger in size and zoned for residential conservation development. It is considered due to its lot size and general location. It is inferior in topography and being used primarily for short term housing. It is ranked inferior due to topo and less commercial exposure. Comparable 2 is a 2013 sale of an RC zoned property, again considered due to size and general location. There was a building pad on the site at the time of sale, but some of the topography is inferior to the subject. It is again inferior in lack of commercial exposure and superior in view. Considering all variables, it is ranked relatively similar. Comparable 3 is a confidential 2014 sale is similarly zoned land in the area. It is ranked slightly inferior due to topography.(no photo – confidential) Comparable 4 is an older transaction of a much larger parcel. This had similar zoning to the subject. Sales price was broken down allocating $2.30/SF ($100,000/AC) for land, $96,437 for infrastructure, and $51,291 for survey and geotechnical report. It is considered an inferior indicator due to economies of scale. It had a bio cell on it for decontamination. TABLE 4.2 - COMPARABLE SALES RANKING GRID 2 08/13 ▇...

Land Valuation. The Company and the School District acknowledge and agree that neither (i) the value of the land associated with the Project Site as of the Effective Date (the “Existing Land Value”), nor (ii) any increases in the land value associated with the Project Site (the “Increased Land Value,” and collectively with the Existing Land Value, the “Land Value”) are eligible to be exempted pursuant to the CRA Agreement. In the event that the School District exercises its right to challenge the Land Value pursuant to R.C. Section 5715.19 for any triennial period during which an exemption is claimed pursuant to the CRA Agreement, and any such challenge seeks a Land Value equal to a recent arm’s length sale price of the land, the Company shall cooperate with the School District in connection with any such challenges, including, but not limited to, filing a stipulation of value with the Licking County Board of Revision and/or the Ohio Board of Tax Appeals. Nothing herein shall prevent the Company or the School District from initiating or participating in challenges to (i) the Land Value for reasons other than a recent arm’s length sale, or (ii) the total value of the Project Site, as allowable by law.

Land Valuation. Tyler shall provide the following approach to the revaluation of land characteristics: