Institutional Controls Sample Clauses

Institutional Controls. It is expressly acknowledged and agreed by the parties that the Company and Pfizer may, if approved or permitted by the applicable Governmental Authority or Environmental Law, use Institutional Controls to complete a Remedial Action at or related to a Co-Located Facility. Where the use of such Institutional Controls are necessary or appropriate, the parties agree, on behalf of their respective Groups, to cooperate with the other to seek, execute and record such controls.
Institutional Controls. The above cleanup levels are considered protective for non-food related or industrial related commercial settings. Therefore, institutional controls (e.g., deed restrictions limiting the future use of the building) will be necessary. Such restrictions on use will need to be implemented by the appropriate party. In the event that the imposition ojf institutional controls cannot be accomplished, cleanup to health- based levels suited to unrestricted future use of the building or demolition of building will be necessary.
Institutional Controls. In the event that the Environmental Governmental Authority with jurisdiction over the Remedial Work agrees that the level of remediation required at a Real Property at which Remedial Work is being performed may be reduced by the imposition of restrictions limiting the use and occupancy of the Real Property to non-residential uses, Purchasers shall not unreasonably withhold its consent to the imposition of such use restrictions and shall not seek any compensation therefor from Vendors. Vendors shall not propose to any Environmental Governmental Authority or agree to the imposition of any other institutional controls without Purchasers' written consent which consent Purchasers may withhold if Purchasers, in their reasonable discretion, determine that such controls will substantially reduce the value of the Real Property or unreasonably interfere with its current use of the Real Property. 153 157
Institutional Controls. Following completion of the CAP-required cleanup construction, the Port and Ecology will develop an Institutional Controls Plan for the PTM RAU that includes environmental covenants in accordance with WAC 173-340-440 and RCW 64.70. It is anticipated that institutional controls will: • Notify Proponents of the presence of residual contaminated materials, and regulate the disturbance and management of those materials and the cleanup action components; • Require project specific design to reduce risk of creating preferential pathways for contaminant migration or run-off and sediment impacts to Whatcom Waterway (e.g., utility excavations or site grading); • Prohibit extraction of groundwater for drinking or any other use. Groundwater extraction for construction dewatering is allowed, but that is not a beneficial use of water; • Provide for long-term monitoring and stewardship of the cleanup action; and • Require that VI potential be evaluated and/or VI controls constructed beneath future buildings in the LP-MW01 subarea if groundwater compliance monitoring indicates that vinyl chloride and PCE concentrations have not naturally attenuated to below cleanup levels in that subarea.
Institutional Controls. Seller agrees that, where its remedy requires institutional controls at a Purchaser facility that is part of the Assets, Seller will initially propose to the governmental authority involved and seek to convince the authority to accept only a “general industrial use” deed restriction, with no groundwater used as potable water (collectively “General Industrial Use”). Purchaser will accept General Industrial Use restrictions in its deeds on properties comprising the Assets without compensation. If the governmental authority requires a more extensive institutional control, Seller and Purchaser will work together in good faith and will each use its reasonable efforts to limit the extent and terms of any restriction on the use of Purchaser’s property as much as possible including defining the Purchaser’s process area in a manner reasonably acceptable to Purchaser. In particular, Seller will notify Purchaser prior to proposing any institutional control restrictions to any governmental authority and will act reasonably and in good faith to limit the restrictions to either a General Industrial Use limitation or to other use limitations that do not substantially interfere with Purchaser’s ordinary conduct of the Business, including any Planned Changes, and that do not impose on Purchaser an obligation to implement an auditing, monitoring or oversight program related to the effectiveness of the institutional controls. Seller will be responsible for implementing any required auditing, monitoring or oversight program related to the effectiveness of the institutional controls. For any material proposed limitations of which it is aware, Seller will timely report all such material proposed limitations on Purchaser’s ongoing operations resulting from proposed institutional controls to Purchaser’s Vice President, Safety, Health and Environmental Affairs or other designee prior to agreeing to or implementing such institutional controls. At the conclusion of such Seller and Purchaser efforts, Purchaser agrees that, with no compensation to Purchaser from Seller other than as may be required by Section 7.08(h), Purchaser will impose on its facility constituting a part of the Assets, and subject its property to, those deed restrictions, institutional controls and other controls, use limitations, restrictions and terms required by the governmental authority.
Institutional Controls. Lessee hereby consents to the recordation of Institutional Controls, as defined in RCW 70.105D.020(15), as required by the Remedial Action and agrees to (i) subordinate this Lease to the Institutional Controls and (ii) to abide by the terms and conditions of the Institutional Controls.
Institutional Controls. The Completion Documents may be qualified or conditioned by institutional controls (e.g., deed restrictions, engineered barriers) to the extent such controls are consistent with the Propertiesindustrial/commercial use as of the Effective Date and are necessary for issuance of the Completion Documents; provided, however, Seller shall have sole discretion to select the remedial approach for obtaining the Completion Documents. Any such institutional controls are subject to Purchaser’s review and approval, which approval shall not be unreasonably withheld.
Institutional Controls. Except as set forth in Schedule EA 4.1(i), to the Knowledge of Hercules, GES or HDES, no Institutional Control has been imposed or recorded in any public document with respect to any of the HAC Facilities.
Institutional Controls 

Related to Institutional Controls

  • Personal Controls a. Employee Training. All workforce members who assist in the performance of functions or activities on behalf of COUNTY in connection with Agreement, or access or disclose PHI COUNTY discloses to CONTRACTOR or CONTRACTOR creates, receives, maintains, or transmits on behalf of COUNTY, must complete information privacy and security training, at least annually, at CONTRACTOR’s expense. Each workforce member who receives information privacy and security training must sign a certification, indicating the member’s name and the date on which the training was completed. These certifications must be retained for a period of six (6) years following the termination of Agreement.

  • Audit Controls P. Contractor agrees to an annual system security review by the County to assure that systems processing and/or storing Medi-Cal PII are secure. This includes audits and keeping records for a period of at least three (3) years. A routine procedure for system review to catch unauthorized access to Medi-Cal PII shall be established by the Contractor.

  • Exchange Controls As a condition to this grant of Units, the Employee agrees to comply with any applicable foreign exchange rules and regulations.

  • No Material Weakness in Internal Controls Except as disclosed in the Disclosure Package and the Prospectus or in any document incorporated by reference therein, since the end of the Company’s most recent audited fiscal year, there has been (i) no material weakness in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting (whether or not remediated) and (ii) no change in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

  • TIA Controls If any provision of this Indenture limits, qualifies, or conflicts with another provision which is required to be included in this Indenture by the TIA, the required provision shall control.

  • Internal Controls The Company shall maintain a system of internal accounting controls sufficient to provide reasonable assurances that: (i) transactions are executed in accordance with management’s general or specific authorization; (ii) transactions are recorded as necessary in order to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with GAAP and to maintain accountability for assets; (iii) access to assets is permitted only in accordance with management’s general or specific authorization; and (iv) the recorded accountability for assets is compared with existing assets at reasonable intervals and appropriate action is taken with respect to any differences.

  • Controls To the extent required by Rule 13a-15(e) under the Exchange Act, to maintain “disclosure controls and procedures” (as defined under Rule 13a-15(e) under the Exchange Act) and a system of internal accounting controls sufficient to provide reasonable assurances that (i) transactions are executed in accordance with management’s general or specific authorization, (ii) transactions are recorded as necessary in order to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with GAAP and to maintain accountability for assets, (iii) access to assets is permitted only in accordance with management’s general or specific authorization and (iv) the recorded accountability for assets is compared with existing assets at reasonable intervals and appropriate action is taken with respect to any differences.

  • Indenture Controls If and to the extent that any provision of the Notes limits, qualifies or conflicts with a provision of this Indenture, such provision of this Indenture shall control.

  • Accounting Controls The Company and its Subsidiaries maintain systems of “internal control over financial reporting” (as defined under Rules 13a-15 and 15d-15 under the Exchange Act Regulations) that comply with the requirements of the Exchange Act and have been designed by, or under the supervision of, their respective principal executive and principal financial officers, or persons performing similar functions, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with GAAP, including, but not limited to, internal accounting controls sufficient to provide reasonable assurance that (i) transactions are executed in accordance with management’s general or specific authorizations; (ii) transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP and to maintain asset accountability; (iii) access to assets is permitted only in accordance with management’s general or specific authorization; and (iv) the recorded accountability for assets is compared with the existing assets at reasonable intervals and appropriate action is taken with respect to any differences. Except as disclosed in the Registration Statement, the Pricing Disclosure Package and the Prospectus, the Company is not aware of any material weaknesses in its internal controls. The Company’s auditors and the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors of the Company have been advised of: (i) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are known to the Company’s management and that have adversely affected or are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Company’ ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and (ii) any fraud known to the Company’s management, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Company’s internal controls over financial reporting.

  • Disclosure Controls and Procedures; Deficiencies in or Changes to Internal Control Over Financial Reporting The Company has established and maintains disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15 and 15d-15 under the Exchange Act), which (i) are designed to ensure that material information relating to the Company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to the Company’s principal executive officer and its principal financial officer by others within those entities, particularly during the periods in which the periodic reports required under the Exchange Act are being prepared; (ii) have been evaluated by management of the Company for effectiveness as of the end of the Company’s most recent fiscal quarter; and (iii) are effective in all material respects to perform the functions for which they were established. Since the end of the Company’s most recent audited fiscal year, there have been no significant deficiencies or material weakness in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting (whether or not remediated) and no change in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. The Company is not aware of any change in its internal control over financial reporting that has occurred during its most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.