Proposed Actions. If an operation or the exercise of any right or option respecting the Assets is proposed in circumstances in which such operation or the exercise of such right or option would result in Purchaser incurring an obligation pursuant to Section 8.2, the following shall apply to such operation or the exercise of such right or option (hereinafter referred to as the "Proposal"):
Proposed Actions. Notices of proposed disciplinary/adverse actions, furloughs, or removals. Issues relating to such proposal notices may, however, be raised in connection with any grievance over the final decision on the proposed action.
Proposed Actions. (a) On all matters relating to Consent Actions (as defined below) that are approved by XxXxxx, the Key Holders agree to be present, in person or by proxy, at all meetings of shareholders for the vote thereon, to vote all the Key Holder Shares in favor of the proposed action, or in connection with any solicitation of written consents from the stockholders of the Company, to consent to the proposed action, and raise no objections to the proposed action, and to waive and refrain from exercising any dissenters rights, appraisal rights or similar rights in connection with such proposed action.
Proposed Actions. XXXII. Grievance Procedure Section
Proposed Actions. Based on the results of the Human Health Risk Assessment and the Screening-Level Ecological Risk Assessment and the evaluation of ‘Applicable or Relevant and Appropriate Requirements (ARARs) the following Removal Action Objectives (RAOs) were defined: • Reduce risk for recreational users and occupational workers from exposure to direct gamma radiation from mine rock and mine openings; • Reduce risk for recreational users and occupational workers from exposure due to inhalation of radon decay products from mine rock and mine openings; • Reduce risk for recreational users from exposure due to potential ingestion of soil from the mine rock piles and potential ingestion of surface water drainage from the 300-Foot Level portal; • Reduce or eliminate safety hazards related to the mine openings and access to the underground mine workings; • Reduce risk or eliminate exposure pathways for terrestrial plants, terrestrial invertebrates, terrestrial wildlife from exposure to metals and radionuclides defined as constituents of concern in mine rock and soil associated with mine-affected areas via direct contact, ingestion, and food-chain exposure; • Reduce risk or eliminate exposure pathways for riparian animals from exposure to radium in surface water at the 700-Foot/900-Foot Levels and the drainage from the 300-Foot Level portal. Additionally, the following RAOs were identified based on land-use management plans for the Site and vicinity: • Minimize disturbance to existing undisturbed areas; • Minimize reliance on long-term active maintenance. Quantitative preliminary removal action goals (RAGs) were established to address these RAOs. For evaluating the effectiveness of the removal action, these goals are expressed in terms of reducing the identified risks or eliminating the exposure pathways to human and ecological receptors. The overall goal of the removal action is to reduce human and ecological risk that is attributable to the mine-affected areas to an acceptable level. The primary goals are to: • Reduce risk for recreational users and occupational workers from exposure to radon inhalation and direct gamma radiation attributable to mine rock and mine openings above background on a Site-wide basis to below the EPA excess dose criterion of 15 mrem/year or a cancer risk of less than 1E-5 above background. • Reduce risks for terrestrial plants, invertebrates, and wildlife from exposure to metals and radionuclides defined as constituents of concern in mine rock and soi...
Proposed Actions. The OPC will continue to work with the California Department of Fish and Game to ensure that the aquaculture PEIR provides a forward-looking, scientifically-robust framework to regulate current and future ocean aquaculture facilities. Coordinate with state agencies regarding emerging aquaculture operations in adjacent federal waters to promote sustainable aquaculture operations consistent with the OPC‘s mandate to protect California‘s ocean ecosystems. Support the completion of the Guide to Aquaculture Registration, Permits, Licenses, Laws, and Regulations in California to facilitate coordination of permit review.
Proposed Actions s. The granting of an award or quality step increase, or the adoption or failure to adopt an employee suggestion. For those matters which are grievable, this procedure shall be the exclusive procedure for the parties and the employees. However, nothing in the section shall prevent employees from appealing adverse actions or actions for unacceptable performance to the Merit Systems Protection Board (MSPB) provided the employee has not initiated a grievance in writing on the matter in accordance with this Agreement. An employee may appeal an adverse action under the Negotiated Grievance Procedure or the Merit Systems Protection Board Appeal Process, but not both.
Proposed Actions. The FS agrees to review and consider the recommendations in the LCAS prior to making any new decision to undertake actions in lynx habitat. A proposed or new action is one for which a federal agency has no documented agency decision (does not yet have a decision notice, record of decision, or decision memo). For actions on NFS lands which are proposed by and/or involve third parties, such as pipeline corridors, access requests, issuance of new authorizations upon expiration of existing authorizations or permits, etc. the agencies agree to review and consider the new information on the lynx included in the LCAS, the Science Report, and appropriate local information to ensure compliance with all applicable federal laws, including ESA, NEPA and NFMA during the agencies’ analysis and decision-making processes. For actions on NFS lands which are proposed by the FS and do not involve third parties, an evaluation will be prepared of the action using relevant new information, including the LCAS and the Science Report, to determine whether the activity may affect the lynx. If the evaluation indicates an activity is likely to adversely affect the lynx, the agency will not authorize the activity until plans are revised or amended as indicated in Part 2, or it has been determined that plans do not need to be amended or revised to incorporate additional measures for lynx. After any necessary revisions or amendments of Forest Plans to incorporate additional measures for lynx, projects may be authorized provided they are consistent with the Forest Plans and comply with ESA and other applicable laws. This section does not change current plan direction but, for an interim period, will affect priorities for selecting and implementing particular management actions. The FS and FWS will also look for opportunities to undertake proactive management actions to benefit lynx, based on the LCAS, to the extent they are consistent with current land and resource management plans. Nothing in this section of the Conservation Agreement is intended to alter existing laws and regulations. In addition, section 504 of the 1995 Rescissions Act requires that, not withstanding any other law, grazing permits which expire before scheduled NEPA analysis and decision shall be issued under the same terms and conditions. Section 504 also provides upon completion of the scheduled NEPA analysis and decision, the terms and conditions of existing grazing permits may be modified or reissued as necessary. ...
Proposed Actions. 43 4.1.1 Short-term (2016-2017) 43
Proposed Actions. I. Anticipated immediate removal activities for the Site include, but are not limited to, the following:
