General Architecture Clause Samples
The General Architecture clause defines the overall structure and design principles that will guide the development or implementation of a project, system, or service. It typically outlines the key components, their interactions, and the standards or frameworks to be followed, ensuring all parties have a shared understanding of the technical or organizational blueprint. By establishing these foundational guidelines, the clause helps prevent misunderstandings, aligns expectations, and provides a reference point for future decisions or modifications.
General Architecture. The MCS should adhere to the Web Services Interoperability Organization Basic Profile version 1.1, and Basic Security Profile version 1.0. The MCS should support multiple languages and multiple currencies. • Service Provider should ensure it can deploy the appropriate skill sets and skill levels with respect to software or technology provided by third party vendors. • Service Provider should install transaction volume monitoring software and take action if expected levels are significantly exceeded.
General Architecture. The Provider will support, maintain and improve the existing IT elements of the service, including those components currently provided by the Previous Provider or third parties as a shared service not dedicated to the Services. See attached diagram for more details.
General Architecture. The general architecture of CR-PLAY mixed pipeline is represented in Figure 2. From a high level point of view, the pipeline is composed of software modules that handle image and video based rendering data from capture to (edit and) play phase, passing through reconstruction.
General Architecture. The exhibit below presents an illustration of the architecture of the resale product provided. E-mail server Security (anti-spam, …) Web site host server Internet CBL backhaul and core network End user
General Architecture. 22 4.1 QUALITY AND APPEARANCE OF BUILDING EXTERIOR (SEP 2000).............................22 4.2 CONSTRUCTION WASTE MANAGEMENT (SEP 2000)...........................................22 4.3 EXISTING FIT-OUT, SALVAGED, OR RE-USED BUILDING MATERIAL (SEP 2000)(TSA SEP 2002)..
General Architecture. The Home Operator receives data from the Local Operator which is normally a mobile network operator (“MNO”) in Country A. This general architecture for this service, which is based on mobile roaming, is depicted in the following diagram: Connectivity between MNOs for exchanging roaming traffic over a private IP network. All roaming traffic between different MNOs is sent over an IPX. An IPX is a private IP network and is governed by standards set by the GSMA. IPX Resiliency IPXs are highly resilient. There are multiple IPX providers in the world (including PCCW Global,) that are peered together. Typically an MNO will deploy multiple connections to an IPX. MNOs typically have two IPX providers for additional resiliency. Connectivity between Home Operator and Console Connect IoT Service platform. The Console Connect IoT Service platform itself is highly resilient, with two active nodes. The Home Operator is connected to each of the Console Connect IoT Service nodes, with leased lines to each node.
General Architecture. The exhibit below presents an illustration of the architecture of the resale product provided. E-mail server Security (anti-spam, …) Web site host server Internet CBL backhaul and core network End user The Reseller may request an interconnection with CBL network, so as to forward traffic from/to the Reseller’s retail customers (e.g. e-mail traffic) on a direct route. This interconnection will be at prices and conditions, which shall be negotiated outside this Agreement.
General Architecture. Identity-based security in a Web Services environment requires an identity infrastructure, where a requestor (service consumer) can interact with the different resources (service producers) in a secure way. From the producer’s perspective, it is important to distinguish who has to be identified properly; namely, the requestor itself, and also the user behind it. This leads to two generic models: • In the first case, the end user is identified at a client application which acts on behalf of the user requesting services from the appropriate service producers. Here a single statement can be used to properly identify the client application and the end user. Figure 15 shows an example workflow, where the user is authenticated at the Identity Provider (IdP). The client application at the host queries directly each resource including the user’s identity data (expressed in ▇▇▇▇, and carried through SOAP). The AS is an Authorization Service, where the request can be properly validated (possibly, contacting Attribute Authorities for further information about the requestor).
General Architecture. Figure 6 shows the architecture overview of the service discovery infrastructure. It comprises components from the FI-WARE architectural model [56] as well as service discovery components such as Resource Directory (digrectory), specific protocol adapters accommodating DNS-SD, mDNS, CoAP Resource Directory, and its own IoT6 stack API (discovery API) support. There are distinct types of device (sensor) clusters, namely ETSI M2M clusters, large IPv6 clusters, small IPv6 clusters, RFID clusters, and other clusters (IPv4, proprietary, legacy technologies, etc.). As for the ETSI M2M clusters and others, the existing service discovery mechanism supports CoRE Resource Directory [55]. It is based on DNS-SD and mDNS with appropriate protocol adapters providing the full set of required functionality. The focus of the subsequent analysis related to the service discovery is on the IPv6 sensor clusters using the DNS-SD and mDNS methodology. The difference between the two types of IPv6 clusters is their size in terms of the number of sensors and efficiency of multicast traffic within the particular segment of the network. Where there is a small number of sensors and with the efficient multicast infrastructure, it is possible to implement a direct service discovery using only mDNS (or lmDNS) mechanism. However, within the large sensor networks and where the multicast traffic is considered to be inefficient, it is better to employ the DNS-SD methodology, where additional DNS server is placed within the network, serving as a local database with resource directories and record structured as per DNS-SD convention [10].
General Architecture. A backend based on blockchain technology is integrated with the existing system, a monolithic web server including API and database as well a corresponding web client. Important transaction data, such as device ID and deposit amount, is recorded on the blockchain data, so it can work as an append only, irreversible log, and later be verified through different clients, over different replicas, and by third parties. The web server stores references (Ethereum addresses) in the blockchain. Additionally, some parts used for the device transfer, e.g. amount of deposit, are stored both on the web server and recorded in the blockchain replicas, since this information is used for visualization to the user as well as for verification purposes. The main purpose to use Blockchain technology is to provide immutability (append-only or irreversibility), security, transparency in the data, and inexorability of the actions (conditional transfer of deposits, unstoppable, even in the future). This is crucial for eReuse, to have a way to promote the traceability of the different actions that are carried out among any actors of the system, that may be involved in the usage of one or more devices in a circular economy. Therefore, the web client is a user interface that manages private information (detailed for owners and managers with access permissions) and public information (for anyone willing to access the public access limited information, for traceability and accountability purposes). The web client is also an interface to the blockchain backend that summarizes and records data of the replicated blockchain data structure, and runs a set of smart contracts. A set of user requests made through the web client are sent directly to the blockchain data store. Hence, they can not be modified by the web server, and blockchain features such as immutability and security are guaranteed. Additionally, another client (e.g. from OBADA) may be used independently from the DeviceHub web server to verify blockchain data.