Forces. The error shall be less than 1 per cent of the channel amplitude class.
Forces. The effective date of the change in legal residence shall also be included in the notification. [42 FR 33731, July 1, 1977. Redesignated at 71 FR 2150, Jan. 13, 2006] § 215.10 Agency withholding proce- dures.
Forces. 1 3. Employees working less than twenty (20) hours per week shall not be 2 eligible for participation in a medical care insurance plan, mental health 4 plan or life and accidental death and dismemberment insurance plan as 5 approved by the Board and no contributions will be made by the District 6 on behalf of those employees.
Forces. ‘may choose to adopt’ other types of shared information and tools, where a national requirement has not been agreed. These resources will be made accessible in POLKA.
Forces. All components of a NATO-led force, to include all personnel, animals, material, and provisions, together with any civilian components of such forces as defined in the NATO SOFA, Paris Protocol and PfP or other nations participating under the NATO lead. The term also includes all ships, aircraft, vehicles, stores, equipment, and ammunition, as well as all air, land and sealift movement resources, together with their support services including contractors deploying or supporting the force.
Forces. Producing Quality Code Developing quality code is a process that can be facilitated by the use of the appropriate tools. CI is one of such tools, and a cornerstone in quality assurance procedures, providing automated ways of ensuring reproducibility, regressions tests, deployability and so on. Striving for Quality Everybody and especially maintainers are interested in maintaining the quality of (core) packages, as the introduction of new bugs or regressions or reducing maintainability will affect all current and future users of ROS. (Perceived) usability and stability have a direct influence on the reputation of software – especially in industrial settings where quality of packages is often considered paramount. Increasing trust The use of Continuous Integration to continuously test and analyse software components and guard them against regressions increases trust in those components: a high coverage (and growing) test suite with a long history of succeeding tests are a good indication of the quality of the software. Testing also increases trust and confidence of developers, as such continuous testing functions as a 'safety net' or 'canary' that warns developers whenever changes to be introduced would cause regressions and / or unintended side-effects.
Forces. Avoiding Reintroduction of Problems Using tests for past bugs influences quality in the long term. It is a well accepted practice in many open-source projects. Writing regressions tests, you contribute to long term quality of the ROS ecosystem. You enable maintenance of code, and better automated discovery of inconsistencies. Documenting Design and Requirements Regression tests document your coding decisions, and communicate to other developers automatically about their violation. Thus tests become documentation for your code. Enable Others to Contribute to ROS It is very difficult for new external developers to contribute to your components. When they make changes to code, they are often doing it in the blind, driven by a lot of guesswork. By providing a harness of regression tests, you help them in the task. They get immediate feedback for their changes. It becomes easier to contribute to a project. Amplifying Value of Continuous Integration Regression tests, along with normal scenario-based requirements tests contribute to overall body of automated tests for your component. This increases effectiveness of the build system and of continuous integration (CI). Your component is better tested against evolution of other APIs that it depends on (CI servers will tell you better and more precisely what problems develop in your code). Development Cost Regression testing comes at a cost: you need to develop a test, which sometimes may be difficult or costly. Sometimes it might also be nontrivial, as the test should be automatic. Maintenance Cost Regression tests need to be maintained. When the design of the component changes, a lot of tests become invalidated (for instance no longer compile, or throw runtime exceptions related to the API design). These tests fail not only because the redesign re-introduced bugs but also because they need to be updated to the new design. Occasionally, with bigger redesigns, old regression tests should be dropped.
Forces. Producing quality code Developing quality code is a process that can be facilitated by the use of the appropriate tools. CI is one of such tools, and a cornerstone in quality assurance procedures, providing automated ways of ensuring reproducibility, regressions tests, deployability and so on. Make ROS business friendly The use of ROS and ROS-I should be extended beyond the academic community, into industrial applications and industrial actors using and contributing to it. These actors usually have stricter IP sharing rules, and by giving them the proper tools such as CI, we facilitate their involvement into the ROS community. Facilitate the collaboration and contribution to the community Code contributed to the ROS repository is expected to comply with certain rules regarding its quality. By the use of CI as part of the development process, compliance with such requirements is facilitated, which fosters further contributions.
Forces. Strive for quality In order to encourage other parties to work with the provided software, it should meet preparations to sustain a flawless code. Fail fast Development becomes much more expensive if bugs are not detected at an early stage. Save resources Regression test using real hardware or simulation is too expensive.
Forces. Regional and local commanders may issue supplemen- tary regulations within the framework of DOD regulations to adapt the latter to specific legal and practical Authority to use force against military personnel can be found in the provisions of the Uniform Code of Military The use of force against civilians is based on common-law rules of self-defense and summary Special provisions restrict the use of deadly force. These provisions are based on the “minimum force doctrine”. This doctrine is emphasized strongly in all other cases as The right to administer installations as competent commanders see fit-such as through the use of identity checks, restricted access, and searches-is derived from the state’s title as land owner or rightful tenant to the United States regulations explicitly declare all powers sub- ject to further restriction in compliance with local law or sta- tioning American commanders in Germany main- tain that the SOFA, and to a greater extent the warrant no such Accordingly, the general regula- tions of the different services apply in full. Some exceptions are made regarding members of civil support units and local hire