Evaluation Data. The employee shall be offered the opportunity to review, with the appropriate Xxxx/Manager, her/his evaluation data and report. The employee shall also be given the opportunity to make written comments about his/her evaluation, which shall be entered in the personnel file.
Evaluation Data. (a) Data created or maintained by a granting agency as part of the evaluation process referred to in this section are protected nonpublic data until completion of the evaluation process at which time the data are public with the exception of trade secret data as defined and classified in section 13.37.
Evaluation Data. Customer agrees that any data or information that Customer enters into the Service used on a Pilot Basis, and any customizations made to such Service by or for Customer, during the Pilot Basis period may be permanently lost unless Customer purchases the same Service on a non-Pilot Basis before the termination date set forth in Section 4.2 above.
Evaluation Data. 10.5.1 The employee shall be offered the opportunity to review his/her evaluation data and report with the appropriate Vice President/ delegate.
Evaluation Data. To the best of Sellers' knowledge and belief, each of the maps, and all of the geological and production data, pricing data, reserve data or other data or documentation heretofore furnished by Sellers to Buyer ("Evaluation Data"), was complete, and the information reported therein was correct, in all material respects as of the date of such delivery.
Evaluation Data. Two types of evaluation data were used: • For efforts, person hours were counted. As many of the tools (crawling, XXXXX) take significant computation effort, the effort was not measured in machine time but in the time where people were involved. Machine time is usually much higher. • For quality, human evaluation was used in addition to automatic scores (BLEU, using one reference translation). As only comparative (COMP) evaluation was done, the test persons had to decide which one of two translation outputs was better, if any. Quality change was calculated by: number improvements minus number deteriorations, divided by total amount sentences. This is a standard measure used in industrial MT comparisons. For evaluation, the Sisyphos-II tools made by Linguatec were used. Two evaluators were engaged to do the evaluations. For the quality comparison, a test set of 1500 sentences from the automotive domain was used. The test set was taken from crawled automotive texts, so it contains spelling errors, wrong segmentation etc.; no cleaning was done. None of those 1500 sentences is in the training corpus. This test set was used for KFZ and UNK. For DCU system adaptation, 500 sentences out of the test set were used as development set, so the test set was reduced to 1000 sentences. This reduced test set was used for DCU and GLO.
Evaluation Data. Bank shall cooperate with EFS and the Nominated Purchaser to provide EFS and Nominated Purchaser with access (subject to customary confidentiality agreements) to all Program-related data and information (other than Bank's proprietary work product) reasonably requested by the Nominated Purchaser for the sole purpose of due diligence regarding the purchase of the Accounts, provided that such information is not otherwise reasonably available from EFS or its Affiliates.
Evaluation Data. Respondents must provide the following information to Toronto Hydro for the evaluation of the transformer losses and characteristics. Proposals lacking the required data may not be evaluated.
Evaluation Data. The Addax Group owns or has the right to use, without any limitations or restrictions adversely affecting such use, other than arising pursuant to the Production Sharing Contracts, in the ordinary conduct of the Addax Group’s business, all material technology, processes, maps, seismic records, shot points, field notes, interpretations and programs, all seismic, geological and geophysical information and libraries, and other proprietary information relating to the business and the properties of the Addax Group currently used by such persons in the conduct of their respective businesses (collectively, the “Evaluation Data”), and the use of all of the Evaluation Data by the Addax Group as of the Expiry Time: (i) has not and will not alter or impair any such rights, (ii) has not breached and will not breach any agreement with a third party vendor relating to any such Evaluation Data, (iii) has not required and will not require (whether in the Addax Group’s opinion or the third party vendor’s opinion), the payment of any additional sum thereto or (iv) has not required and will not require (whether in the Addax Group’s opinion or the third party vendor’s opinion), the return of any records or information. No person has challenged or questioned the validity or effectiveness of any license or agreement relating to the Evaluation Data or the rights of the Addax Group to use the applicable Evaluation Data.
Evaluation Data. To the extent practicable, eligibility determinations shall be based on inventory information. If the information gathered in the inventory for archaeology is inadequate to determine eligibility, BLM or GWD Project contractors may conduct limited subsurface probing, or other evaluative techniques, to determine eligibility. Subject to approval by BLM, evaluative testing of archaeological sites is intended to provide the minimum data necessary to define the nature, density, and distribution of materials in potential historic properties, to make final evaluations of eligibility, and to devise treatment options responsive to the information potential of the property.
