Evaluate. The process used to examine and determine the level of quality or the progress toward improvement of quality and/or performance related to Contractor service delivery systems. External Quality Review (EQR): The analysis and evaluation by an external quality review organization of aggregated information on quality, timeliness, and access to the Health Care services that a CMO or its Subcontractors furnish to Members and to DCH. External Quality Review Organization (EQRO): An organization that meets the competence and independence requirements set forth in 42 CFR 438.354 and performs external quality review, and other related activities.
Evaluate. The process used to examine and determine the level of quality or the progress toward improvement of quality and/or performance related to Contractor service delivery systems. External Quality Review (EQR): The analysis and evaluation by an external quality review organization of aggregated information on quality, timeliness, and access to the Health Care services that a CMO or its Subcontractors furnish to Members and to DCH. External Quality Review Organization (EQRO): An organization that meets the competence and independence requirements set forth in 42 CFR 438.354 and performs external quality review, and other related activities. Federal Financial Participation (FFP): The funding contribution that the federal government makes to the Georgia Medicaid and PeachCare for Kids programs. Federally Qualified Health Center (FQHC): An entity that provides outpatient health programs pursuant to Section 1905(l) (2) (B) of the Social Security Act. Fee-for-Service (FFS): A method of reimbursement based on payment for specific services rendered to a Member.
Evaluate with each participant the personal and professional development achieved through participation in the Xxxxxxxx programme. THE INTERMEDIARY ORGANISATION (WHERE APPROPRIATE) UNDERTAKES TO: Select suitable host organisations and ensure that they are able to achieve the placement objectives. Provide contact details of all parties involved and ensure that final arrangements are in place prior to participants’ departure from their home country. THE SENDING AND HOST ORGANISATIONS JOINTLY UNDERTAKE TO: Negotiate
Evaluate the progress of the project on an on-going basis and take appropriate action if required. The host organisation undertakes to: Xxxxxx understanding of the culture and mentality of the host country. to participants tasks and responsibilities to match their knowledge, skills, Assign competencies and training objectives and ensure that appropriate equipment and support is available.
Evaluate. At the 9 month mark, the STM and congregational leaders will review the progress made toward the identified goals/priorities, and make adjustments as needed. For example, some of the original goals/priorities might have been accomplished or set aside and new objectives added. In other words, this process is marked by some degree of fluidity, all in the service of deepening the health of the congregation. It also may be that sufficient progress is noted that the contract can be concluded at the 12-month interval. At the 12 month mark (and subsequent 3-month intervals, if further contract extensions are agreed upon), the same will happen.
Evaluate. The fourth phase in our approach is to measure the effectiveness of the communications efforts. The results of this phase will allow us to refine the communications plan as needed to ensure it is as effective as possible. In addition to media monitoring, we will use data on Web hits, call center activity, recruiting, and other measures as requested by NYSDOT.
Evaluate. Xx. Xxxxxxx Xxxxxx, Senior Consultant, manages the development and delivery of professional learning systems and change efforts. Xx. Xxxxxx is currently serving as advisor for the grades K–5 Chicago Public Schools curriculum development project. She is also serving as client lead for a K–5 literacy audit in Hillsborough County (FL) Public Schools, as well as subject matter expert for the delivery of K–3 professional learning for the Connecticut State Department of Education (DOE). Previously, Xxxxxxx served as Clinical Assistant Professor for the University of Florida, School of Special Education, Psychology, and Early Childhood Studies. In this role, she collaborated with and supported the University of Florida Literacy Initiative and the Xxxxx Xxxxxxxxx Literacy Challenge, including professional learning, collaborating with partnership facilitators, and building capacity of teachers and school leaders as well as teaching all of the courses for the graduate certificate in Dyslexia. Xxxx Xxxxxxxx, Senior Consultant, has over 20 years of experience in the early childhood field working within early care and education, early intervention, infant and early childhood mental health, health and child welfare systems. Prior to joining PCG, Xx. Xxxxxxxx co-directed the Professional Development and Workforce Innovations Department at ZERO TO THREE. In this position she was responsible for advancing ZERO TO THREE’s capacity to offer high quality professional development and technical assistance services to the early childhood field.
Evaluate. Identify pesticides of concern (POC) by evaluating a list of pesticides of interest (pesticides which have potential to threaten local resources) to determine if those pesticides are found at concentration levels locally that are approaching or exceeding reference points and therefore are a threat to local water quality. The base list Required Activities: 06.02.01 Monitor compliance with pesticide water quality risk mitigation measures, and respond to pesticide water contamination events especially where water quality standards or other reference points are threatened. of pesticides of interest can be found in Appendix 6. 06.01.03
Evaluate. Maintenance Department will evaluate the category of repair, determine responsibility, and repair item as soon as possible.
Evaluate. The supervisor and the employee evaluate results based on pre-established goals and performance measures.
