Design Verification. Design verification is the process of ensuring that specified requirements have been met. The Design QA/QC Plan shall include procedures for verifying and documenting that the design output meets the design input requirements. Verification shall include independent checks, tests, and reviews. Verification shall be performed under the direction of the DQAM. Designs provided by subconsultants shall be independently verified and documented under the direction of the DQAM prior to their approval and incorporation into the work of others.
Design Verification. Design reviews are regularly held to control all aspects of the design process and are part of the Master Design Schedule.
Design Verification. 2.2.1 Provide a cursory review of the current TxDOT Design to ensure that all elements of the schematic conform to current standards. Develop a list of non- conformance elements and provide recommendations to the Mobility Authority. Develop a design notebook which notes the results of the design.
Design Verification. The verification process entails the comparison of all design concepts, design assumptions, inputs and outputs with the Project Requirements to confirm that the design satisfies the functional requirements. Design verifications are formal processes which shall be planned to correspond with major milestones of the design, and, at the City’s discretion, shall include representatives from the City. Project Co shall retain a permanent record of all verification reviews.
Design Verification. Xxxxx shall establish and maintain procedures for verifying the design of the Product(s), in compliance with Quality Management System Requirements. Design Verification shall confirm that the Design Output for the Product(s) meets the Design Input requirements and any other Xxxxx requirements. Results of the verification shall be documented in the DHF.
Design Verification. This feature has been designed based on the manufacturers recommended circuit. It is a flash memory capable of holding two uncompressed programs (also known as images) which are used to program the on-board FPGA upon power up.
Design Verification. The memory interfaces on this card are arguably the most complex and difficult to design. Thus, a significant amount of work was undertaken to model and verify the design of these interfaces. Different board and FPGA settings were compared to achieve optimal signal integrity. The example diagram shown below is typical of the results from parameter sweeps on board impedance. Figure 3: BK0_DQ0 – Comparison between 50Ω (left) and 40Ω (right) Impedance Figure 4: Optimal DDR FPGA Driver Settings
Design Verification. The PCIe interface was designed and reviewed against both the Altera manufacturer’s instructions, and the PCIe specification2.
Design Verification. The PCB design was extensively reviewed with special reference to matching lines and minimizing impedance discontinuities.
Design Verification. The DVT is a hardware centric test. The functions and objective performance of each Chipset Functionality Release shall be verified during a DVT for each phase and each release within a phase. For the Phase 2 DVT, the 10x bearer channel size shall be tested at the PHY layer between the Oberon Integration Board and the SBSS. (Note: Performance of the 10x bearer channel may be limited by the Python RF Transceiver chip.)
