Proposed Timeline. The duration of the PLP can be for as little as a semester and as long as two years, but PLP credits will only be awarded upon successful completion of the project. Proposals: The Professional Learning Project should outline the research to be completed, the actions to be taken, and the evidence of student learning expected in addressing the inquiry question. The proposal should be detailed with dates for key events. An inquiry journal will be used to reflect on the professional learning throughout the project. The proposal should contain reasonable estimates of the time necessary to complete each phase of the PLP. The ultimate success of the project will lie in many educators engaging in this process of life-long learning, reflecting on what they have learned and bringing that new understanding or insight into their everyday classroom planning and instruction. Project participants will also be required to make a public presentation of their work to the staff and/or community. Deadlines for proposals to begin in the Fall semester is May 1 for the Spring semester is November 1. Committee: A Committee made up of three teachers appointed by the APT and three administrators appointed by the Superintendent will review PLP proposals and recommend to the Superintendent those proposals that the Committee deems appropriate along with an estimate of the credits that will be awarded upon the successful completion of the project. The Superintendent will make a final determination within 30-days of receipt of the proposal from the Committee. The Committee will also evaluate PLPs in progress and determine if the PLP has been satisfactorily completed and how many credits should be awarded. If the Committee is not unanimous in determining whether the PLP has been satisfactorily completed or how many credits to award, the matter shall be referred to the Superintendent for a final determination. If the teacher(s) disagree with the Superintendent’s final determination, the teacher(s) involved, accompanied by another member of the bargaining unit, shall be given the opportunity to discuss the PLP with the Superintendent. Credits: PLP credits will be awarded after all requirements are met. PLP credits will be based upon a conversion table that roughly equates to the time commitment of university credits and degrees. For example, a three-credit university course normally requires 45 hours of class time plus 2 hours of travel/preparation for each hour of class time, or a total o...
Proposed Timeline. The Settling Parties agree and provide the following sequential timeline for both the Settling Parties and Commission to address the remainder of this proceeding.
Proposed Timeline. Tenant Broker Information [Name and Position/Title Company] C. DMS Acceptance & Authorization to Proceed Approved to Proceed Yes No Date
Proposed Timeline. The following timetable is a guide only and will be revised at regularly intervals as necessary. {work backwards from final submission date} Final submission date: Statements of Expectations You can expect your Supervisors to: 1. Remind you of details of your enrolment and regulations for your programme of study towards your dissertation.
Proposed Timeline. ▪ Federal Program Development Workshops (Workshop): As has been the case for the past four years, MMO Partners proposes to meet in Santa Xxxx to: review the status of the 2023 federal program and discuss related grant opportunities and the timeline for development of City’s 2024 Federal Platform (September -October 2023). ▪ Federal Funding Report: Using our workshop's information, MMO Partners will develop a 2024 Federal Funding Report (November 2023). ▪ Finalize Federal Program: MMO Partners, working with Santa Xxxx, will finalize and present the 2024 federal platform (December 2023 – January 2024). ▪ Federal Agency and Congressional Engagement: MMO Partners/Santa Xxxx officials meet with Federal agencies, Members of Congress and Congressional staff, and national associations to advocate for Santa Rosa's federal program priorities included in the Scope of Services (January through December). ▪ Grant Assistance: Using its federal agency officials’ network, MMO Partners provides our clients with real-time grant information. Our frequent contact with federal agency staff to schedule client appointments, clarify program regulations, and discuss project eligibility provides us with easy access to key federal officials and access to senior departmental leadership. We have recurring contacts with federal agency officials as part of a program of routine outreach to federal agencies to facilitate quick access to federal program experts to answer program eligibility questions and vet project ideas. Before grant opportunities are announced, MMO works with federal agencies to build support for grant proposals. For instance, MMO recently scheduled meetings for Santa Xxxx Police Chief Xxxx Xxxxxx and the COPS Office to discuss the City’s staffing and recruitment challenges. This discussion provided the City with critical guidance that it can use to shape its future grant proposal and provided federal decision- makers with a perspective on the issues facing the City. (Ongoing)
Proposed Timeline. 2.3.2 Best Overall Value
Proposed Timeline. Provide a timeline for delivering Phase 1 of the development project by 15 December 2023 and Phase 2 by 31 March 2024. Include descriptions of any assumptions you would have to make to create the timeline and any information or other expectations IDMC would have to provide in order to meet this deadline.
Proposed Timeline. The timeline for delivery of accepted outputs is shown below. Date Output Description April/ May 2014 Quality assurance of 2013-14 performance indicators Short report on quality assurance of on-going performance indicators June/ July 2014 Inception Report; Evaluation Framework This involves a first inception report for the evaluation and submission of the evaluation framework for Phase I and Phase II. October 2014 Phase I Evaluation Report This is the final evaluation report for the retrospective evaluation of the Phase I of the IGC project. Novemb er 2014 Revised Phase II Evaluation Framework and Review of the IGC’s monitoring framework This is the submission of the revised evaluation framework for Phase II of the IGC programme. This will include a review of the IGC’s monitoring framework. April 2015 Quality assurance of 2014-15 performance indicators Short report on quality assurance of on-going performance indicators January 2016 Phase II Mid-Term Report/Workshop This is the first full evaluation of Phase II of the IGC. It evaluates the IGC from the start of the IGC's Phase II project until the Mid-Term period. April 2016 Quality assurance of 2015-16 performance indicators Short report on quality assurance of on-going performance indicators April 2017 Quality assurance of 2016-17 performance indicators Short report on quality assurance of on-going performance indicators August 2017 Phase II Final Report This is the final evaluation report for the evaluation of Phase II of the IGC project. It will include a full evaluation of the whole of the Phase II project as well as a more specific evaluation of the IGC since the 2016 Mid-Term Report. Novemb er 2017 Peer Reviewed journal article Describing the learning from applying theory based evaluation methods for the impact of research on policy making Governance and management arrangements The governance and management arrangements for the evaluation will be as follows: Governance Committee: The Governance Committee is the body responsible for giving strategic direction to the IGC on a range of issues. The committee will give high level comments on the evaluation, including the chosen evaluation methodology and all reports/outputs. The IGC Governance Committee comprises IGC and DFID representatives. DFID has final sign-off responsibility of all outputs of the evaluation. DFID will determine the IEB tender committee. Evaluation Management Group (EMG): An EMG will be responsible for the day-to-day oversight of th...
Proposed Timeline. 2.3.2 Best Overall Value a. See Section xx in Attachment A 2.3.3 Support/SLA
