Table 8 definition
Table 8. Analysis 2a: metric selection results. Metric - stressor correlation was consistent (yes) if the sign of the correlation was as expected. ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ rank correlation between the EQR, calculated using the formula EQR1, and the stressor is reported. A metric was redundant (redundancy=yes) if correlated (r>0.
Table 8. Performance indicator for measuring sustainability of buildings (Umbria Region, 2013)
Table 8. Elected Women members in Kerala and Uttar Pradesh at all three levels of governance in 199931 (Unit: 100,000) Gram Panchayat Panchayati Samiti Zilla Parishad State Women Total % Women Total % Women Total % KE 3883 10270 37.81 563 1547 36.39 104 300 34.67 UP 174410 682670 25.55 14002 58165 24.07 648 2551 25.4 Source: India Panchayat Raj Report, 2001, Vol. I- National Institute of Rural Development
Examples of Table 8 in a sentence
As Table 8 shows, a majority of students live on their own, most commonly renting their accommodations either off campus (15%) or on campus (40%).
As Table 8 shows, the personal characteristics of students who participated in the 2013 survey are mostly similar, with a few exceptions.
As Table 8 shows, a majority of students live on their own, most commonly renting their accommodations either off campus (52%) or on campus (3%).
Software Subscriptions for Red Hat Enterprise Linux – Academic Editions are subject to the additional terms and conditions, including Use Cases set forth in Table 8 below.
Subclause 6.1.2: The settling band default value in Table 8 shall be based on the maximum of 2.5% of change or 0.5% of nameplate capacity.
More Definitions of Table 8
Table 8. ▇▇▇▇▇▇ ratio: mean difference analysis: gender. male female complete period mean difference Mean SR 0.2812 0.1008 0.1804 (0.6999) (0.4265) pre-Covid period male female Mean SR 0.2449 0.0397 0.205212609 (0.7804) (0.4106) Covid-period male female Mean SR 0.5761 0.5280 0.048148003 (1.3513) (1.4439) Note: This table analyses the differences in the mean SR between genders in each period. Mean differences are listed in the last column. No significance of results is measured, but none were found to be significant. panel A: pre-Covid mean SD S K male 𝛼 0.0021 0.0116 4.4660 28.4983 ß𝑀𝑘𝑡 0.5347 0.7307 0.7728 2.6923 female 𝛼 0.0002 0.0067 1.8102 4.5929 ß𝑀𝑘𝑡 0.7472 0.8120 0.8608 0.9613 Panel B: Covid period mean SD S K male 𝛼 0.0071 0.0227 2.7942 10.9900 ß𝑀𝑘𝑡 0.4424 0.9598 2.4969 11.9720 female 𝛼 0.0049 0.0170 1.4469 2.8871 ß𝑀𝑘𝑡 0.3515 0.7349 -0.6118 -0.0820 note: This table presents the descriptive statistics of the ▇▇▇▇▇▇ alpha. The table presents the pre-Covid descriptive statistics in panel and the Covid period statistics in panel B. In addition to the ▇▇▇▇▇▇ α, the coefficient ß𝑖,𝑀𝐾𝑇 descriptive statistics are also included.
Table 8. Frequency of Slut as Address by Relationship Survey responses for slut demonstrated similar patterns, though at an overall lower frequency. The reported use of address for slut by relationship demonstrated a slight pattern depending on how close the speaker considered their addressee. In Table 8, all of the
Table 8. Descriptive Statistics for Social Media Data Table 9: Descriptive Statistics for Advertising Data, Advertisement Characteristics, and Program Characteristics Advertising Data and Advertisement Characteristics Program Characteristics Table 10: Time Ad Instances Air Table 11: Model-free Evidence on the Relationship between Online Program Engagement and Online Shopping Activity
Table 8. HSCoE Metal Hydride Material Categories Tier 1 Developed Materials Tier 2 Developing Materials Down-selected Materials Metal Hydrides NaAlH 4 2LiNH 2 +MgH 2 Mg(NH 2 ) 2 +MgH 2 +2LiH TiCr(Mn)H 2 MgH 2 Mg 2 NiH 4 Material property data for the metal hydride materials of interest (particularly Tier 1 and Tier 2 materials) were collected from a variety of sources, which included MHCoE reports and investigator data, previous studies and the open literature. To perform preliminary engineering analyses several key material properties were identified as a high priority requirement. These key material properties included:
Table 8 means Table 8 of the Transportation Element of the 2008? Comprehensive Plan, which is incorporated in this chapter by this reference.
Table 8. The helper methods on the protocol state.
Table 8. Children observed Age category Frequency Percent Cumulative Percent Total 207 100 Table 9: single reasons for bringing child to health facility. n = 207 Reason for bringing child to health facility Count Column % Table 10: Combined reasons for bringing child to health facility. n = 207 Reason for bringing child to health facility Count Column % Health Worker Practice Screening Table 11: General Screening Action Yes No n General screening Screening % of cases Figure 10: General screening Table 12: Assessments Task Cases % n Assessments on child