Spiritual definition
Spiritual means those aspects of a human being associated with the emotions and feelings, which are unique to each individual, as distinguished from the physical body;
Spiritual means set apart for God, different from the world. Spiritual is that which is under the control of the Spirit of God, as explained in the verse previous to Ephesians 5:19. “And be not drunk with wine, wherein is excess; but be filled with the Spirit.” Spiritual is the opposite of carnal, fleshly. “And I, brethren, could not speak unto you as unto spiritual, but as unto carnal, even as unto babes in Christ.” Spiritual is the opposite of the unfruitful works of darkness that are mentioned in Ephesians 5:11. Spiritual is the opposite of worldliness.
Spiritual means patient and patient's family beliefs and practices as they relate to the meaning of their life, death, and their connection to humanity that may or may not be of a religious nature.
Examples of Spiritual in a sentence
To hold a termly review with my Spiritual Director of my prayer life.
Method: To discuss current prayer life with my Spiritual Director, develop together a new rule of life relating to prayer that works with the demands of training and practice one new form of prayer.
When Teachers are absent for observance of Indigenous Ceremonial, Cultural, Spiritual Observance Leave days in excess of three (3) days per School Year, the days shall be without pay.
Indigenous Ceremonial, Cultural, Spiritual Observance Leave is subject to operational requirements of the Teacher’s school.
The parties agree that this Article constitutes reasonable accommodation for Indigenous Ceremonial, Cultural, Spiritual Observance Leave.
More Definitions of Spiritual
Spiritual. , therefore, means to become unworldly. This is a Platonic notion, and it has been very influential in the Christian prayer tradition.
Spiritual. —pneumatikos means “non-carnal”1; “non-physical” 2 “pertaining to the spirit…supernatural or spiritual”3 “connotes the ideas of invisibility and of power”4
Spiritual means that God is not physical or material. John 4:24 & Luke 24:39.
Spiritual also means that our union with Christ is not a mere “physical” union. We do not have to climb onto a wooden cross and hang there for 6 hours, in order to feel more intimate with Jesus (every year, some devout Catholic believers in Latin America and the Philippines do do that!). Our
Spiritual songs. Literally means songs written by the Spirit. Only the Psalms fit that criteria. Sola Scriptura. When folks speak of being “inspired”, we must not confuse that to be on the par of infallible, inerrant canon (especially when they inadvertently, or deliberately, espouse
Spiritual means set apart for God, different from the world. Spiritual is that which is under the control of the Spirit of God, as explained in the verse previous to Ephesians 5:19. “And be not drunk with wine, wherein is excess; but be filled with the Spirit.” Spiritual is the opposite of carnal, fleshly. “And I, brethren, could not speak unto you as unto spiritual, but as unto carnal, even as unto babes in Christ.” Spiritual is the opposite of the unfruitful works of darkness that are mentioned in Ephesians 5:11 in the same context as Ephesians 5:19. Spiritual is the opposite of worldliness. “And be not conformed to this world…” (Ro. 12:2). “Love not world, neither the things that are in the world. If any man love the world, the love of the Father is not in him. For all that is in the world, the lust of the flesh, and the lust of the eyes, and the pride of life, is not of the Father, but is of the world” (1 Jo. 2:15-16).
Spiritual engagement is welcome as well. The irony that my subjects will appreciate is that while this statement may have seemed clear and self-explanatory when (if) they read it when they were considering committing to the religion major, they now recognize that it is full of problematic terms that are hardly as self-evident as they once seemed. In other words, these goals seem fairly straightforward—unless you are a scholar of “religion.” I will now explore the formation and continual reformation of the discourse of religious studies as facilitated through the critical theoretical engagement with its terms as shared with my subjects in the 490 course. I will endeavor to illustrate the ambiguity which belies the “secular”/religious binary constraining the official framing of academic and ethical authority of the Department of Religion and Emory University. I have deliberately chosen to place this discussion within a narrative tracing the progress of the 490 course in order to illustrate the fact that the scholars who constitute the Department of Religion at Emory are well aware of the precarious nature of this powerful yet misleading binary and are self-consciously mandating the critical engagement of the religion majors with them. I view this self-critical dialogue as the extending of an invitation to these students for full participation in the dynamic tradition of religious scholarship of which the Emory Department of Religion is one particular institutional manifestation among many. Through this discussion, I hope to clarify the terms of my research question using authors my colleagues have read and highlight the theoretical problems they identify in order to address them in my theoretical framework. We will now turn to ▇.▇. ▇▇▇▇▇, our course’s first assigned author to explicate the historical and cultural evolution of the term ‘religion’ with its attendant baggage, to appropriate and modify his distinct conceptualizations of the objective and subjective dimensions of “religion.”